A GIS analysis of suitability for construction aggregate recycling sites using regional transportation network and population density features

Resources, Conservation and Recycling

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 351-365

  Robinson Jr , Gilpin R ^a   Kapo, Katherine E ^a  

^a U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

Author keywords

Maryland; RAP; Recycled aggregate; RPCC; Virginia; Weighted logistic regression (WLR); Weights of evidence (WofE)

Indexed keywords

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOTOR TRANSPORTATION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PAVEMENTS; PORTLAND CEMENT; RECYCLING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; ROADS AND STREETS; STRENGTH OF MATERIALS; WEAR OF MATERIALS;

AGGREGATE RECYCLING; DEMAND; POPULATION DENSITY; TRANSPORTATION NETWORKS;

AGGREGATES;

FACILITY LOCATION; GIS; POPULATION DENSITY; RECYCLING; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DEVELOPING COUNTRY; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; RECYCLING; TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT; UNITED STATES; URBAN AREA;

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; MARYLAND; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; VIRGINIA;

EID: 4744350100     PISSN: 09213449     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.04.009     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Agterberg F.P. LOGDIA-FORTRAN 77 program for logistic regression with diagnostics, Computers. Comput. Geosci. 15(4):1989;599-614
2. Agterberg FP, Bonham-Carter GF, Wright DF. Statistical pattern integration for mineral exploration. In: Ga'al G, Merriam DF, editors. Computer applications in resource estimation prediction and assessment of metals and petroleum. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press; 1990. p. 1-12.
3. Agterberg FP, Bonham-Carter GF, Cheng Q, Wright DF. Weights of evidence modeling and weighted logistic regression for mineral potential mapping. In: Davis JC, Herzfeld UC, editors. Computers in geology, 25 years of progress. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1993. p. 13-32.
4. Barksdale RD. The aggregate handbook. Arlington, VA, USA: National Stone, Sand, and Gravel Association; 2000, one CD disk.
5. Bates RL. Geology of the industrial rocks and minerals. New York, USA: Dover Publications Inc.; 1969.
6. Bonham-Carter GF. Geographic information systems for geoscientists - modeling in GIS. New York, USA: Elsevier Science; 1994.
7. Bonham-Carter G.F., Agterberg F.P., Wright D.F. Integration of geological datasets for gold exploration in Nova Scotia. Photogramm. Eng. 54(11):1988;1585-1592
8. Census Bureau. 2000 Census Tracts. Arcview shapefile. 1:500,000. http://www.census.gov/geo/www/cob/tr2000.html, U.S. Department of Commerce, Census Bureau home page; 2000.
9. Fakundiny RH. Marketing analysis of the sand and gravel business using central-place theory and surficial geology maps. In: Dunn JR, Fakundiny RH, Rickard LV, editors. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Forum on the Geology on Industrial Minerals. N.Y. State Museum Bulletin 1980;436:40-52.
10. Joseph SE, Miller RV, Tan SS, Goodman RW. Mineral land classification of the greater Los Angeles area. Part V. Classification of sand and gravel resource areas, Saugus-Newhall production-consumption region, and Palmdale production-consumption region. California division of mines and geology special report 143; 1987.
11. Kemp LD, Bonham-Carter GF, Raines GL, Looney CG. Arc-SDM: Arcview extension for spatial data modelling using weights of evidence, logistic regression, fuzzy logic and neural network analysis. http://ntserv.gis.nrcan.gc. ca/sdm/, Natural Resources Canada Arc-SDM home page; 2001.
12. Longley PA, Goodchild MF, Maguire DJ, Rhind DW. Geographic information systems and science. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2001. p. 150-1.
13. Marlow J.E., Stanley M.C., Hudman G.M. Modeling urban resources: a transportation GIS approach. Aggregates Manager. 6(3):2001;30-33
14. Poulin R, Bildeau ML. A model of a mineral aggregate market - the Eastern Coastal USA. Resource Policy; June 1993. p. 131-49.
15. Poulin R., Pakalnis R.C., Sinding K. Aggregate resources production and environmental constraints. Environ. Geol. 23(3):1994;221-227
16. Raines G.L., Bonham-Carter G.F., Kemp L.D. Predictive probabilistic modeling using Arcview GIS. ArcUser. 3(2):2000;45-48
17. Robinson Jr GR. Trends in availability of aggregate. Min Eng 2004;17-24.
18. Robinson Jr G.R, Brown WM. Sociocultural dimensions of supply and demand for natural aggregate - examples from the mid-Atlantic region, United States. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 02-350, http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2002/ of02-350/, U.S. Geological Survey publications homepage; 2002.
19. Robinson Jr GR, Menzie WD, Hyun H. Recycling of construction debris as aggregate in the mid-Atlantic Region, USA. Resources, conservation, and recycling, in press.
20. Stanley M.C., Marlow J.E., Harris D.P. Land-use issues and the aggregates industry - an introduction to the issues we face. Aggregates Manager. 5(9):2000;30-33
21. Tepordei VV. Natural aggregates - foundation of America's future. U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet FS 144-97; 1999, reprinted February 1999.
22. Tepordei VV. Aggregates industry atlas of the United States. Arlington, VA, USA: National Stone, Sand and Gravel Association; 2001, one CD-disk.
23. U.S. Department of Transportation. National Transportation Atlas Database, National Highway Planning Network data, 1:100,000, National Rail Network, 1:2,000,000. Vector digital data. http://www.bts.gov/gis, U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics homepage; 2002.
24. U.S. Geological Survey. Mineral Commodity Summaries, sand and gravel (construction) and stone (crushed) commodities, 2000. http://minerals.usgs.gov/ minerals/pubs/mcs/, U.S. Geological Survey, mineral commodity summaries homepage; 2001.
25. Wilburn DR, Goonan TG. Aggregates from natural and recycled sources: economic assessments for construction applications - a materials flow study. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1176; 1998.