Imaging evaluation of meniscal injury of the knee joint: A comparative MR imaging and arthroscopic study

Clinical Imaging

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 372-376

  Chang, Cheng Yen ^a,b   Hondar Wu, Hung Ta ^a,b   Huang, Tung Fu ^a,b   Ma, Hsiao Li ^a,b   Hung, Shih Chieh ^a,b  

^a TAIPEI VETERANS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL YANG MING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Arthroscopy; Knee joint; Menisci (meniscus); MR

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSIS; JOINTS (ANATOMY); MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT TREATMENT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

KNEE JOINTS; MENISCAL INJURY;

BONE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE ARTHROSCOPY; KNEE MENISCUS RUPTURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INJURY SEVERITY SCORE; KNEE INJURIES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MENISCI, TIBIAL; MIDDLE AGED; PROBABILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 4744340770     PISSN: 08997071     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0899-7071(03)00245-6     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Resnick D Internal derangements of joints: emphasis on MR imaging. Resnick D Diagnosis of bone and joint disorders. 1997;559-679 W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia
2. Carmichael IW, MacLeod AM, Travlos J MRI can prevent unnecessary arthroscopy. J Bone Jt Surg, Br Vol. 79:1997;624-625
3. Trieshmann HW, Mosure JC The impact of magnetic resonance imaging of the knee on surgical decision making. Arthroscopy. 12:1996;550-555
4. Stoller DW, Martin C, Crues JV, Kaplan L, Mink JH Meniscal tears: pathologic correlation with MR imaging. Radiology. 163:1987;731-738
5. Mesgarzadeh M, Moyer R, Leder DS, Revesz G, Russoniello A, Bonadarpour A, Tebranzadeb J, Guttmann D MR imaging of the knee: expanded classification and pitfalls to interpretation of meniscal tears. Radiographics. 13:1993;489-500
6. Ruff C, Weingardt JP, Russ PD, Kilcoyne RF MR imaging patterns of displaced meniscus injuries of the knee. AJR. 170:1998;63-67
7. Trieshmann HW, Mosure JC The impact of magnetic resonance imaging of the knee on surgical decision making. Arthroscopy. 12:1996;550-555
8. Rappeport ED, Wieslander SB, Stephensen S, Lausten GS, Thomsen HS MRI preferable to diagnostic arthroscopy in knee joint injuries: a double-blind comparison of 47 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 68:1997;277-281
9. Imhoff A, Buess E, Hodler J, Fellmann J Comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy for the diagnosis of knee meniscal lesions. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 83:1997;229-236
10. Lotysch M, Mink J, Crues JV, Schwartz SA Magnetic resonance imaging in detection of meniscal injuries. Magn Reson Imaging. 4:1986;94. Abstract
11. Crues JV, Mink J, Levy LT, Lotysch M, Stoller DW Meniscal tears of the knee: accuracy of MR imaging. Radiology. 164:1987;445-448
12. Davis SJ, Teresi LM, Bradley WG, Burke JW The "notch" sign: meniscal contour deformities as indicators of tear in MR imaging of the knee. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 14:1990;975-980
13. Shankman S, Beltran J, Melamed E, Rosenberg ZS Anterior horn of the lateral meniscus: another potential pitfall in MR Imaging of the knee. Radiology. 204:1997;181-184
14. Fitzgerald SW, Peduto AJ, Fonner BT, Miller FH, Hoff FL Bucket handle tears of the medial meniscus and the status of the anterior cruciate ligament: new observations. [Abstract] 83rd Scientific Assembly and Annual Meetings. Radiological society of North America, Chicago. 205:1997;187