Conjectural variation based learning model of strategic bidding in spot market

International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy System

Volumn 26, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 797-804

  Song, Yiqun ^a   Ni, Yixin ^b   Wen, Fushuan ^b   Wu, Felix F ^b  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Conjectural variation; Learning; Strategic bidding

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COSTS; ELECTRIC POWER PLANTS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MARKETING; NEURAL NETWORKS; PRODUCTION;

CONJECTURAL VARIATION (CV); STRATEGIC BIDDING;

ELECTRICITY;

EID: 4744339968     PISSN: 01420615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2004.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. David AK, Wen FS. Strategic bidding in competitive electricity markets: a literature survey. Power Engng Soc Summer Meet 2000;4:2168-73.
2. Szkuta BR, Sanabria LA, Dillon TS. Electricity price short-term forecasting using artificial neural networks. IEEE Trans Power Syst 1999;14(3):851-7.
3. Hong YY, Tsai SW, Weng MT. Bidding strategy based on artificial intelligence for a competitive electric market. IEE Proc Gener Transm Distrib 2001;148(2):159-64.
4. Nogales FJ, Contreras J, Conejo AJ. Forecasting next-day electricity prices by time series models. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2002;17(2):342-8.
5. Wen FS, David AK. Optimal bidding strategies and modeling of imperfect information among competitive generators. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2001;16(1):15-21.
6. Ferrero RW, Rivera JF, Shahidehpour SM. Application of games with incomplete information for pricing electricity in deregulated power pools. IEEE Trans Power Syst 1998;13(1):184-9.
7. Garcia-Alcalde A, Ventosa M, Rivier M, Romos A, Relano G. Fitting electricity market models: a conjectural variations approach Power Syst Comput Conf 2002.
8. Day CJ, Hobbs BF, Pang J. Oligopolistic competition in power networks: a conjectured supply function approach. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2002;17(3):597-607.
9. Tirole J. The theory of industrial organization. London: The MIT Press; 1989.
10. Lindh T. The inconsistency of consistent conjectures: coming back to Cournot. J Econ Behav Organ 1992;18:69-90.
11. Breshahan TF. Duopoly models with consistent conjectures. Am Econ Rev 1981;71(5):934-45.
12. Daughety AF. Reconsidering Cournot: the Cournot equilibrium is consistent. Rand J Econ 1985;16(3):368-79.
13. Song Y, Ni Y, Wen F, Hou Z, Wu FF. Conjectural variation based bidding strategy in spot markets: fundamentals and comparison with classical game theoretical bidding strategies. Electric Power Syst Res 2003;67(1):45-51.
14. Mitchell TM. Machine learning. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1997.