Sonographic estimation of fetal weight at term: A proposal of a predictive score of a weight more than 4500g;L'estimation echographique du poids fœtal a terme: Proposition d'un score predictif d'un poids supérieur à 4500 g

Tunisie Medicale

Volumn 82, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 526-530

  Kraiem, Jamel ^a   Chiha, Narjes ^a   Bouden, Sahbi ^a   Ounaissa, Faiez ^a   Falfoul, Abdelaziz ^a  

^a Clin Univ de Gynecol Obstetrique   (Tunisia)

Author keywords

Macrosomia; Predictive score; Sonography

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIRTH WEIGHT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELIVERY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; FETUS; FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; FETUS WEIGHT; HUMAN; MACROSOMIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEASUREMENT; PREDICTION; SCORING SYSTEM; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 4744339511     PISSN: 00414131     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Lipscomb K R, Gregory K, Shaw K. Outcome of macrosomic infants weighing at least 4500 grams: Los Angeles County + University of Southern California experience. Obstet. Gynecol. 1995; 85: 558-64.
2. Treisser A. Macrosomie fœtale. Papiernick E, Cabrol D, Pons J C. Obstetrique. Paris: Flammarion 1995: 563-73.
3. Hall M H. Guessing the weight of the body. Br. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1996; 103: 734-36.
4. ème trimestres. Guide pratique d'échographie obstétricale et gynécologique. Paris Masson 1991: 69-78.
5. Al inamy H, Alaa N, Montaz M, Abdelbaddir M. Intrapartum prediction of macrosomia: accuracy of abdominal circumference estimation. Gynecol. Obstet. Investit 2001; 51: 116-9.
6. Gilby J R, Williams M C, Spellacy W N. Fetal abdominal circumference measurements of 35 cm and 38 cm as predictors of macrosomia. A risk factor for shoulder dystocia. J. Reproduct. Med. 2000; 45: 936-38.
7. Jazayeri A, Heffron J, Phillips R, Spellacy W N. Macrosomia prediction using ultrasound fetal abdominal circumference of 35 centimeters or more. Obstet. Gynecol. 1999; 93: 523-26.
8. Johnstone F D, Prescott R J, Steel J M. Clinical and ultrasound prediction of macrosomia in diabetic pregnancy. Br. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1996; 130: 747-54.
9. Mc Laren R A, Puckett J L, Chauhen S. Estimations of birth weight in pregnant women requiring induction: a comparaison of seven sonographic model. Obstet. Gynecol. 1995; 85: 565-69.
10. Smith G C S, Smith MFS, Mc Nay M B, Flaming J E E. The relation between fetal abdominal circumference and birth weight: Findings in 3512 pregnancies. Br. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1997; 104: 186.90.
11. Ocer F, Kalili S, Budck E, Oral E. Fetal weight estimation and prediction of fetal macrosomia in non-diabetic pregnant women. Eur. J. Obstet Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 1999; 83: 47-52.
12. Hirata G, Medearis A L, Horenstein J. Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight in the clinically macrosomic fetus. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1990; 162: 238-42.
13. Abromowiez J C, Jaffe R, Warsof S L. Ultrasonographic measurement of fetal femur length in growth disturbance. Am. J. Obstet Gynecol. 1989; 161: 1137-40
14. Combs C A, Jaekle R K, Rosenn B, Pope M, Miodovnik M, Siddiqui T A. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight based on a model of fetal volume. Obstet. Gynecol 1993; 82: 365-70.
15. Hadlock E P, Harrid R B, Sharman R S, Deter R L, Park S K. Estimation of fetal weight with the use oF the head, body and femur measurements. A prospective study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol 1992; 166: 1467-72.
16. Chauhan S P, Lutton P M, Bailey K J, Guerrier J P, Morisson J C. Intrapartum clinical, sonographic and parous patients estimates of new born birth weight. Obstet. Gynecol. 1992; 79: 956-58.
17. Combs C A, Sing N B, Khoury J O. Elective induction Versus spontaneous labor after sonographic diagnosis of fetal macrosomia. Obstet. Gynecol. 1993; 81: 492-96.