Uncertainty around home birth transfers

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 115, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 1184-

  Walsh, D ^a   Downe, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL LANCASHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL ERROR; DATA ANALYSIS; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HIGH RISK PREGNANCY; HOME DELIVERY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LETTER; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT TRANSPORT; PERINATAL MORTALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ENGLAND; FEMALE; HOME CHILDBIRTH; HUMANS; PATIENT TRANSFER; PERINATAL MORTALITY; PREGNANCY;

EID: 47349127272     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: 14710528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01807.x     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Hodnett ED, Downe S, Edwards N, Walsh D. Home-like versus conventional institutional settings for birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005 : CD000012.
2. Mori R, Dougherty M, Whittle M. An estimation of intrapartum-related perinatal mortality rates for booked home births in England and Wales between 1994 and 2003. BJOG 2008 115 : 554 9.
3. Steer P. Editors choice. How safe is home birth? BJOG 2008 115 : i ii.
4. Friedman GD. Primer of Epidemiology. London : McGraw-Hill, 2003.
5. NPEU. The Birthplace in England Research Programme (Birthplace). 2008 www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/birthplace Accessed 7 April 2008.