Comparative study of metrics for evaluation of object localisation by bounding boxes

Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Image and Graphics, ICIG 2007

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 459-464

  Hemery, B ^a   Laurent, H ^a   Rosenberger, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ D'ORLÉANS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLOR IMAGE PROCESSING;

BOUNDING-BOX; COMPARATIVE STUDIES; INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES; LOCALISATION; LOCALIZATION ALGORITHMS; METRICS (CO); OBJECT LOCALIZATION;

GRAPHIC METHODS;

EID: 47349126391     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICIG.2007.118     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. M. Basseville. Distance measures for signal processing and pattern recognition. Signal Processing, 18(4):349-369, 1989.
2. M. Beauchemin, K. B. Thomson, and G. Edwards. On the hausdorff distance used for the evaluation of segmentation results. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 24(1):3-8, 1998.
3. J.-P. Cocquerez and S. Philipp. Analyse d'Images: filtrage et segmentation. Masson, 1995.
4. D. Coquin, P. Bolon, and Y. Chehadeh. Evaluation quantitative d'images filtrées. GRETSI97, 2:1351-1354, 1997.
5. E. D'Angelo, S. Herbin, and M. Ratiéville. Robin challenge evaluation principles and metrics. 2006.
6. M. Everingham, A. Zisserman, C. Williams, L. Van Gool, M. Allan, C. Bishop, O. Chapelle, N. Dalal, T. Deselaers, G. Dorko, et al. The 2005 pascal visual object classes challenge. 2005.
7. A. Hafiane. Caractérisation de textures et segmentation pour la recherche d'images par le contenu. PhD thesis, Université de Paris-Sud XI, December 2005.
8. O. Henricsson and E. Baltsavias. 3-d building reconstruction with aruba: A qualitative and quantitative evaluation. Automatic Extraction of Man-Made Objects from Aerial and Space Images (II), pages 65-76, 1997.
9. Q. Huang and B. Dom. Quantitative methods of evaluating image segmentation. International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP'95) Washington DC, USA, 3:53-56, 1995.
10. D. Huttenlocher and W. Rucklidge. A multi-resolution technique for comparing images using the hausdorff distance. IEEE Conference on CVPR, pages 705-706, 1993.
11. D. Martin, C. Fowlkes, D. Tal, and J. Malik. A database of human segmented natural images and its application to evaluating segmentation algorithms and measuring ecological statistics. 8th Int'l Conf. Computer Vision, pages 416-423, July 2001.
12. C. Odet, B. Belaroussi, and H. Benoit-Cattin, editors. Scalable Discrepancy Measures for Segmentation Evaluation, volume 1, septembre 2002.
13. W. Pratt, O. D. Faugeras, and A. Gagalowicz. Visual discrimination of stochastic texture fields. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 8(11):796-804, 1978.
14. C. Rosenberger, S. Chabrier, H. Laurent, and B. Emile. Advances in Image and Video Segmentation, chapter Unsupervised and supervised image segmentation evaluation, pages 365-393. Idea group Publishing, 2006.
15. L. Vinet. Segmentation et mise en correspondance de régions de paires d'images stéréoscopiques. PhD thesis, Université de Paris IX Dauphine, Juillet 1991.
16. D. L.Wilson, A. J. Baddeley, and R. A. Owens. A new metric for grey-scale image comparison. International Journal of Computer Vision, 24(1):5-17, 1997.
17. W. A. Yasnoff, J. K. Mui, and J. W. Bacus. Error measures for scene segmentation. Pattern Recognition, 9:217-231, 1977.