From beliefs to success: Utilizing an expanded TAM to predict web page development success

International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 36-53

  McGill, Tonya ^a   Bax, Samantha ^a  

^a MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Computer attitudes; Internet attitudes; System development success; Technology acceptance model (TAM)

Indexed keywords

FORECASTING; WEB CRAWLER;

ACCEPTANCE BEHAVIOR; COMPUTER ATTITUDE; DEPENDENT VARIABLES; INTERNET ATTITUDES; INTERNET BASED COMPUTING; SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; WEB PAGE DEVELOPMENT;

WEBSITES;

EID: 47349116888     PISSN: 15483908     EISSN: 15483916     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jthi.2007070104     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., & Todd, P. A. (1992). Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Quarterly, 16(2), 227-247.
2. Al-Jabri, I. M., & Al-Khaldi, M.A. (1997). Effects of user characteristics on computer attitudes among undergraduate business students. Journal of End User Computing, 9(2),16-22.
3. Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
4. Chau, P. Y. K. (2001). Influence of computer attitude and self-efficacy on IT usage behavior. Journal of End User Computing, 13(1), 26-33.
5. Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211.
6. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
7. Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man Machine Studies, 38, 475-487.
8. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P., R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
9. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E.R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95.
10. DeSanctis, G. (1983). Expectancy theory as an explanation of voluntary use of a decision support system. Psychological Reports, 52, 247-260.
11. Dishaw, M. T., & Strong, D. M. (1999). Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs. Information & Management, 36(1), 9-21.
12. Fenech, T. (1998). Using perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness to predict acceptance of the World Wide Web. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30, 629-630.
13. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
14. Gellerson, H., & Gaedke, M. (1999). Object orientated Web application development. IEEE Internet Computing, 3(1), 60-68.
15. Goupil, D. (2000, June). End-user application development: Relief for IT. Computing Channels, pp. 2-4.
16. Guimaraes, T., & Igbaria, M. (1997). Assessing user computing effectiveness: An integrated model. Journal of End User Computing, 9(2), 3-14.
17. Harrison, A. W., & Rainer, R. K. (1992). The influence of individual differences on skill in end-user computing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 9(1), 93-111.
18. Hubona, G. S., & Cheney, P. H. (1994). System effectiveness of knowledge-based technology: The relationship of user performance and attitudinal factors. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 4, 532-541.
19. Igbaria, M. (1990). End-user computing effectiveness: A structural equation model. OMEGA International Journal of Management Science, 18(6), 637-652.
20. Igbaria, M. (1993). User acceptance of microcomputer technology: An empirical test. OMEGA International Journal of Management Science, 21(1), 73-90.
21. Igbaria, M., Guimaraes, T., & Davis, G. B. (1995). Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(4), 87-114.
22. Igbaria, M., & Iivari, J. (1995). The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage. OMEGA International Journal of Management Science, 23(6), 587-605.
23. Igbaria, M., & Tan, M. (1997). The consequences of information technology acceptance on subsequent individual performance. Information and Management, 32, 113-121.
24. Lederer, A. L., Maupin, D. J., Sena, M.P., & Zhuang, Y. (2000). The technology acceptance model and the world wide web. Decision Support Systems, 29, 269-282.
25. Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larson, K. R. (2004). The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12, 752-780.
26. Liaw, S.-S. (2002). An Internet survey for perceptions of computers and the World Wide Web: Relationship, prediction, and difference. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 17-35.
27. Loyd, B. H., & Gressard, C. (1984). Reliability and factorial validity of computer attitude scales. Education and Psychological Measurement, 44, 501-505.
28. Lucas, H. C., & Spitler, V. K. (1999). Technology use and performance: A field study of broker workstations. Decision Sciences, 30(2), 291-311.
29. Ma, Q., & Liu, L. (2004). The technology acceptance model: A meta-analysis of empirical findings. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 16(1), 60-72.
30. Mason, R. O. (1978). Measuring information output: A communication systems approach. Information and Management, 1(5), 219-234.
31. McGill, T., Hobbs, V., & Klobas, J. (2003). User developed applications and information systems succes s: A test of DeLone and McLean's model. Information Resources Management Journal, 16(1), 24-45.
32. Moon, J.-W., & Kim, Y.-G. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information and Management, 38, 217-230.
33. Nelson, R. R., & Todd, P. (1999). Strategies for managing EUC on the Web. Journal of End User Computing, 11(1), 24-31.
34. Nunally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
35. Orr, C., Allen, D., & Poindexter, S. (2001). The effect of individual differences on computer attitudes. Journal of End User Computing, 13(2), 26-39.
36. Parish, T. S., & Necessary, J. R. (1996). An examination of cognitive dissonance and computer attitudes. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 116(4), 565-566.
37. Robey, D. (1979). User attitudes and management information system use. Academy of Management Journal, 22, 527-538.
38. Rozzell, E. J., & Gardner, W. L. I. (1999). Computer-related success and failure: A longitudinal field study of the factors influencing computer-related performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 15, 1-10.
39. Russo, N., & Graham, B. (1998). A first step in developing a web application design methodology: Understanding the environment. Paper presented at the Sixth International Conference on Information Systems Methodology, Salford University, Manchester, United Kingdom.
40. Schultz, R. L., & Slevin, D. P. (1975). Implementing operations research/management science. New York: American Elsevier.
41. Seyal, A. H., Rahman, M. N. A., & Rahim, M. M. (2002). Determinants of academic use of the Internet: A structural equation model. Behavior and Information Technology, 21(1), 71-86.
42. Simon, S. J., Grover, V., Teng, J. T. C., & Whitcomb, K. (1996). The relationship of information systems training methods and cognitive ability to end user satisfaction, comprehension, and skill transfer: A longitudinal field experiment. Information Systems Research, 7(4), 466-490.
43. Subramanian, G. H. (1994). A replication of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use measurement. Decision Sciences, 25(5,6), 863-874.
44. Swanson, E. B. (1987). Information channel disposition and use. Decision Sciences, 18, 131-145.
45. Taylor, M. J., McWilliam, J., Forsythe, H., & Wade, S. (2002). Methodologies and Website development: A survey of practice. Information and Software Technology, 44(6), 381-391.
46. Teo, S. H. T., Lim, V. K. G., & Lai, R. Y. C. (1999). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage. OMEGA International Journal of Management Science, 27, 25-37.
47. Torkzadeh, G., & Van Dyke, T. P. (2002). Effects of training on Internet self-efficacy and computer user attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(5), 479-494.
48. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1994). Modeling the determinants of perceived ease of use. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Information Systems, 213-227.
49. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451-481.
50. Wiegers, K. (1999). Software process improvebment in web time. IEEE Software, 16(4), 78-86.
51. Wilder, G., Mackie, D., & Cooper, J. (1985). Gender and computers: Two surveys of computer-related attitudes. Sex Roles, 13(3/4), 215-228.