Laboratory performance testing of venous cannulae during inlet obstruction

Artificial Organs

Volumn 32, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 566-571

  Simons, Antoine P ^a,b   Ganushchak, Yuri ^a   Wortel, Pieter ^a   Van Der Nagel, Theo ^a   Van Der Veen, Frederik H ^a   De Jong, Dick S ^a   Maessen, Jos G ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Drainage; Extracorporeal circulation; Heart surgery; Venous cannula; Venous collapse

Indexed keywords

CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENTS; EXTRACORPOREAL CIRCULATION; HEART SURGERY; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTANCE; LABORATORY PERFORMANCE; PERFORMANCE; PERFORMANCE TESTING; TEST CRITERIA; VENOI CANNULA; VENOI COLLAPSE;

ARTICLE; CANNULA; COLLAPSE; EXTRACORPOREAL CIRCULATION; FLOW RATE; HEART SURGERY; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; LABORATORY TEST; MEASUREMENT; PERCUTANEOUS DRAINAGE; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VENOUS PRESSURE;

EID: 47349114662     PISSN: 0160564X     EISSN: 15251594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2008.00584.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Gerritsen WB, van Boven WJ, Wesselink RM, et al. Significant reduction in blood loss in patients undergoing minimal extracorporeal circulation. Transfus Med 2006 16: 329 34.
2. Fromes Y, Gaillard D, Ponzio O, et al. Reduction of the inflammatory response following coronary bypass grafting with total minimal extracorporeal circulation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002 22: 527 33.
3. van Boven WJ, Gerritsen WB, Waanders FG, Haas FJ, Aarts LP. Mini extracorporeal circuit for coronary artery bypass grafting: initial clinical and biochemical results: a comparison with conventional and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafts concerning global oxidative stress and alveolar function. Perfusion 2004 19: 239 46.
4. von Segesser LK, Tozzi P, Mallbiabrrena I, Jegger D, Horisberger J, Corno A. Miniaturization in cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion 2003 18: 219 24.
5. Kurusz M, Deyo DJ, Sholar AD, Tao W, Zwischenberger JB. Laboratory testing of femoral venous cannulae: effect of size, position and negative pressure on flow. Perfusion 1999 14: 379 87.
6. Simons AP, Reesink KD, Molegraaf GV, et al. An in vitro and in vivo study of the detection and reversal of venous collapse during extracorporeal life support. Artif Organs 2007 31: 152 9.
7. Reesink K, Dekker A, Van der Nagel T, et al. Suction due to left ventricular assist: implications for device control and management. Artif Organs 2007 31: 542 9.
8. Mulholland JW, Massey W, Shelton JC. Investigation and quantification of the blood trauma caused by the combined dynamic forces experienced during cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion 2000 15: 485 94.
9. Lapietra A, Grossi EA, Pua BB, et al. Assisted venous drainage presents the risk of undetected air microembolism. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000 120: 856 62.
10. Girod G, Jaussi A, Rosset C, De Werra P, Hirt F, Kappenberger L. Cavitation versus degassing: in vitro study of the microbubble phenomenon observed during echocardiography in patients with mechanical prosthetic cardiac valves. Echocardiography 2002 19: 531 6.
11. Kutschka I, Schonrock U, El Essawi A, Pahari D, Anssar M, Harringer W. A new minimized perfusion circuit provides highly effective ultrasound controlled deairing. Artif Organs 2007 31: 215 20.
12. Martens S, Dietrich M, Pietrzyk R, Graubitz K, Keller H, Moritz A. Elimination of microbubbles from the extracorporeal circuit: dynamic bubble trap versus arterial filter. Int J Artif Organs 2004 27: 55 9.
13. Morita M, Yozu R, Matayoshi T, Mitsumaru A, Shin H, Kawada S. Closed circuit cardiopulmonary bypass with centrifugal pump for open-heart surgery: new trial for air removal. Artif Organs 2000 24: 442 5.
14. Mueller XM, Tevaearai HT, Jegger D, Augstburger M, Burki M, von Segesser LK. Ex vivo testing of the Quart arterial line filter. Perfusion 1999 14: 481 7.
15. von Segesser LK, Jegger D, Mucciolo G, et al. The Smartcanula: a new tool for remote access perfusion in limited access cardiac surgery. Heart Surg Forum 2005 8: E241-5.
16. Jegger D, Corno AF, Mucciolo A, et al. A prototype paediatric venous cannula with shape change in situ. Perfusion 2003 18: 61 5.
17. Jegger D, Mueller X, Mucciolo G, et al. A new expandable cannula to increase venous return during peripheral access cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Int J Artif Organs 2002 25: 136 40.
18. Park JY, Park CY, Min BG. A numerical study on the effect of side hole number and arrangement in venous cannulae. J Biomech 2007 40: 1153 7.
19. Humphries K, Sistino JJ. Laboratory evaluation of the pressure flow characteristics of venous cannulas during vacuum-assisted venous drainage. J Extra Corpor Technol 2002 34: 111 4.
20. Ni Y, Leskosek B, Shi L, et al. Optimization of venous return tubing diameter for cardiopulmonary bypass. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001 20: 614 20.
21. Delius RE, Montoya JP, Merz SI, et al. New method for describing the performance of cardiac surgery cannulas. Ann Thorac Surg 1992 53: 278 81.
22. Bennett EV Jr., Fewel JG, Ybarra J, Grover FL, Trinkle JK. Comparison of flow differences among venous cannulas. Ann Thorac Surg 1983 36: 59 65.
23. Arom KV, Ellestad C, Grover FL, Trinkle JK. Objective evaluation of the efficacy of various venous cannulas. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1981 81: 464 9.
24. Klabunde RE. Vascular function. In: Sun B, ed. Cardiovascular Physiology Concepts, 1st Edition. Baltimore MD, Philadelphia PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005 111.
25. Amoore JN, Santamore WP. Venous collapse and the respiratory variability in systemic venous return. Cardiovasc Res 1994 28: 472 9.