New fundamental profiling characteristics for designing adaptive web-based educational systems

IADIS International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age, CELDA 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 10-17

  Germanakos, Panagiotis ^a   Tsianos, Nikos ^a   Mourlas, Constantinos ^a   Samaras, George ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CYPRUS   (Cyprus)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Cognition; Emotions; User profiling; Visual attention

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; COGNITION; EMOTIONS; USER PROFILING; VISUAL ATTENTION;

EDUCATION; WEBSITES; WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 47349112803     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Ayersman, D., J. and Reed, W., M., 1998. Relationships among hypermedia-based mental models and hypermedia knowledge. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30 (3), pp. 222-238.
2. Brusilovsky, P. and Nejdl, W., 2004. Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web. © 2004 CSC Press LLC.
3. Brusilovsky, P., 2001. Adaptive Hypermedia, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 11: 87-110.
4. Brusilovsky, P., 1996. Adaptive Hypermedia: an attempt to analyse and generalize, In P. Brusilovsky, P. Kommers, & Streitz (Eds)., Multimedia, Hypermedia, and Virtual Reality, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 288-304.
5. Brusilovsky, P., 1996. Methods and techniques of adaptive hypermedia. User Modeling and User Adapted Interaction, 1996, v6, n 2-3, pp 87-129.
6. Demetriou, A., Efklides, A. and Platsidou, M., 1993. The architecture and dynamics of developing mind: Experiential structuralism as a frame for unifying cognitive development theories. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58 (Serial No. 234), 5-6.
7. Demetriou, A. and Kazi, S., 2001. Unity and modularity in the mind and the self: Studies on the relationships between self-awareness, personality, and intellectual development from childhood to adolescence. London: Routdledge.
8. Eklund, J. and Sinclair, K., 2000. An empirical appraisal of the effectiveness of adaptive interfaces of instructional systems. Educational Technology and Society 3 (4), ISSN 1436-4522.
9. Freire, J., Kumar, B. and Lieuwen, D., 2001. WebViews: Accessing Personalized Web Content and Services, ACM 1-58113-348-0/01/0005.
10. Graber, D., A., 2000. Processing Politics. Chapter 2, The University of Chicago Press.
11. Henke, H., 2001. Applying Kolb's Learning Style Inventory with Computer Based Training.
12. Liu, Y. and Ginther, D., 1999. Cognitive Styles and Distant Education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, Volume II, Number III.
13. McLoughlin, C., 1999. The implications of the research literature on learning styles for the design of instructional material. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 1999, 15(3), p. 222-241.
14. Panayiotou, C., Andreou, M., Samaras, G. and Pitsillides, A., Time Based Personalization for the Moving User, Proceedings of International Conference mBusiness (2005), Sydney, Australia, 11-13 July 2005.
15. Parkinson, A. and Redmond, J., A., 2002. The Impact of Cognitive Styles and Educational Computer Environments on Learning Performance.
16. Pithers, R., T., 2002. Cognitive Learning Style: a review of the field dependent-field independent approach, Journal of Vocational Education and Training, Volume 54, Number 1, 2002, p. 117-8.
17. Psychology Foundation of Australia, [on-line], http://www.psy.unsw.edu. au/Groups/Dass/.
18. Reed, W., M., Ayersman, D., J. and Liu, M., 1996. The effects of students' computer-based prior experiences and instructional exposures on the application of hypermedia-related mental models. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14 (2), pp. 175-187.
19. Sharp, J., E., 1998. Learning Styles and Technical Communication: Improving Communication and Teamwork Skills.
20. Yuliang, L. and Dean, G., 1999. Cognitive Styles and Distance Education, Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, Volume II, Number III.