The Darwin project: Evolvability of software-intensive systems

3rd International IEEE Workshop on Software Evolvability 2007, SE

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 48-53

  Van De Laar, Piërre ^a   Van Loo, Sjir ^a   Muller, Gerrit ^a   Punter, Teade ^a   Watts, David ^a   America, Pierre ^b   Rutgers, Joland ^c  

^a EMBEDDED SYSTEMS INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

^b PHILIPS RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (Netherlands)

^c PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MEDICAL IMAGING; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; RESONANCE; SPONTANEOUS EMISSION;

APPLIED RESEARCH; EVOLVABILITY; INTERNATIONAL (CO); MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING (MRI); PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS (CO); RESEARCH AREA (RA); SOFTWARE-INTENSIVE SYSTEMS; USE CASES;

IMAGING TECHNIQUES;

EID: 47349105800     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/SE.2007.7     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. P. America, D. K. Hammer, M. T. Ionita, H. Obbink, and E. Rommes, "Scenario-Based Decision Making for Architectural Variability in Product Families". In: R. L. Nord, ed.: Software Product Lines, Third International Conference, SPLC 2004, Boston, Massachusetts, August 30-September 2, 2004, Springer, LNCS Vol. 3154, pp. 284-303.
2. R. Arnold and S. Bohner, Software Change Impact Analysis, Wiley-IEEE Computer Society Press, 1996.
3. C. Y. Baldwin and K. B. Clark, Design Rules - The Power of Modularity, MIT Press, March 2000.
4. C. M. Christensen, R. Bohmer, and J. Kenagy, "Will Disruptive Innovations Cure Health Care?" Harvard Business Review, September-October 2000, pp. 102-112.
5. T. Copeland and V. Antikarov: Real Options, a Practitioner's Guide. Texere, New York, 2003.
6. E. Fricke and A. Schulz, "Design for Changeability (DfC): Principles to Enable Changes in Systems Throughout Their Entire Lifecycle", Systems Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2005, pp. 342-359.
7. T. Herald, D. Verma, and T. Lechler, "A Model Proposal to Forecast System Baseline Evolution due to Obsolescence through System Operation", In Proceedings of 5th Annual Conference on Systems Engineering Research, Hoboken, New Jersey, March 14-16, 2007.
8. N. Loughran, A. Rashid, "Supporting Evolution in Software using Frame Technology and Aspect-Orientation", Workshop on Software Variability Management, Groningen, The Netherlands, 2003, pp. 126-129.
9. T. G. Olson, L. Parker Gates, J. L. Mullaney, J. W. Over, N. R. Reizer, M. I. Kellner, R. W. Phillips, and S. J. DiGennaro, "A Software Process Framework for the SEI Capability Maturity Model: Repeatable Level", CMU/SEI-93-SR-007, June 1993.
10. D. L. Parnas, "On the Criteria To Be Used in Decomposing Systems into Modules", Communications of the ACM, Vol. 15, No. 12, December 1972, pp. 1053-1058.
11. rd 1998, pp. 45-52.
12. E. Suh, Flexible Product Platforms, PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), USA, 2005.
13. F. van der Linden, J. Bosch, E. Kamsties, K. Känsälä, and H. Obbink, "Software Product Family Evaluation", Software Product Lines, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3154, 2004, pp. 110-129.
14. R. van Ommering, Building Product Populations with Software Components, PhD Thesis, University of Groningen, The Netherlands, 2004.