Challenging species distribution models: The case of maculinea nausithous in the Iberian Peninsula

Annales Zoologici Fennici

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 200-210

  Jiménez Valverde, Alberto ^a   Gómez, José F ^a   Lobo, Jorge M ^a   Baselga, Andrés ^a   Hortal, Joaquín ^a,b  

^a MUSEO NACIONAL DE CIENCIAS NATURALES   (Spain)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUTTERFLY; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; ENDANGERED SPECIES; GIS; LAND COVER; MODELING; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; SURVEY;

EURASIA; EUROPE; IBERIAN PENINSULA; SOUTHERN EUROPE;

INVERTEBRATA; MACULINEA; MACULINEA NAUSITHOUS;

EID: 47349099689     PISSN: 0003455X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5735/086.045.0305     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Anton, C., Musche, M., Hula, V. & Settele, J. 2005: Which factors determine the population density of the predatory butterfly Maculinea nausithous? - In: Settele, J., Kühn, E. & Thomas, J. A. (eds.), Studies on the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe, vol. 2. Species ecology along a European gradient: Maculinea butterflies as a model: 57-59. Pensoft, Sofia/Moscow.
2. Austin, M. 2007: Species distribution models and ecological theory: a critical assessment and some possible new approaches. - Ecological Modelling 200: 1-19.
3. Bourg, N. A., McShea, W. J. & Gill, D. E. 2005: Putting a CART before the search: successful habitat prediction for a rare forest herb. - Ecology 86: 2793-2804.
4. Chefaoui, R. M., Hortal, J. & Lobo, J. M. 2005: Potential distribution modelling, niche characterization and conservation status assessment using GIS tools: a case study of Iberian Copris species. - Biological Conservation 122: 327-338.
5. Clark Labs 2000: Gobal change data archive, vol. 3. 1 km global elevation model. - Clark Labs, Worcester, MA.
6. Dennis, R. L. H., Shreeve, T. G. & Williams, W. R. 1995a: Affinity gradients among European butterflies: evidence and historical component to species distributions. -Entomologis's Gazette 46: 141-153.
7. Dennis, R. L. H., Shreeve, T. G. & Williams, W. R. 1995b: Taxonomic differentiation in species richness gradients among European butterflies (Papilionoidea, Hesperioidea): contribution of macroevolutionary dynamics. - Ecography 18: 27-40.
8. Elmes, G. W., Thomas, J. A., Wardlaw, J. C., Hochberg, M. E., Clarke, R. T. & Simcox, D. J. 1998: The ecology of Myrmica ants in relation to the conservation of Maculinea butterflies. - Journal of Insect Conservation 2: 67-78.
9. Engler, R., Guisan, A. & Rechsteiner, L. 2004: An improved approach for predicting the distribution of rare and endangered species from occurrence and pseudo-absence data. - Journal of Applied Ecology 41: 263-274.
10. Erhard, M., Hennings, V. & Werner, B. 2004: Using CORINE land-cover and statistical data for the assessment of soil erosion risks in Germany. - In: Mohaupt-Jahr, B., Keil, M. & Kiefl, R. (eds.), CORINE land cover 2000 in Germany and Europe and its use for environmental applications: 124-130. Federal Environmental Agency, Berlin.
11. European Environment Agency 2002: I&CLC2000 Technical Reference Document. - Joint research Centre, European Commission.
12. European Environment Agency 2005: CORINE land cover 2000 vector data for Spain.
13. Felicísimo, A. M. & Gago, L. M. S. 2002: Thematic and spatial accuracy: a comparison of the CORINE land cover with the forestry map of Spain. - In: Ruiz, M., Gould, M. & Ramon, J. (eds.), 5th AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science: 109-118. Palma, Balearic Islands, Spain.
14. Ferrier, S. & Watson, G. 1997: An evaluation of the effectiveness of environmental surrogates and modelling techniques in predicting the distribution of biological diversity. - Environment Australia, Canberra, available on the web at http://www.deh.gov.au/biodiversity/publications/ technical/surrogates.
15. Fielding, A. H. & Bell, J. F. 1997: A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. - Environmental Conservation 24: 38-49.
16. García-Barros, E., Munguira, M. L., Martín, J. & Viejo, J. L. 1993: Maculinea nausithous (Bergsträsser, 1779) en Madrid. - SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología 21: 255-257.
17. García-Barros, E., Munguira, M. L., Martín Cano, J., Romo Benito, H., García-Pereira, P. & Maravalhas, E. S. 2004: Atlas de las mariposas diurnas de la Península Ibérica e islas Baleares (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea & Hesperioidea). - Monografías SEA vol. 11, Zaragoza.
18. Gaston, K. J. 2003: The structure and dynamics of geographic ranges. - Oxford University Press, Oxford.
19. Guisan, A. & Zimmermann, N. E. 2000: Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. - Ecological Modelling 135: 147-186.
20. Guisan, A. & Hofer, U. 2003: Predicting reptile distributions at the mesoscale: relation to climate and topography. - Journal of Biogeography 30: 1233-1243.
21. Hastie, T. J. & Tibshirani, R. J. 1990: Generalized additive models. - Chapman & Hall, London.
22. Hirzel, A. H., Hausser, J., Chessel, D. & Perrin, N. 2002: Ecological-niche factor analysis: how to compute habitat-suitability maps without absence data? - Ecology 83:2027-2036.
23. Hirzel, A. H. & Arlettaz, R. 2003: Modeling habitat suitability for complex species distributions by environmental-distance geometric mean. - Environmental Management 32: 614-623.
24. Hirzel, A. H., Hausser, J. & Perrin, N. 2003: Biomapper 3.1. - Laboratory for Conservation Biology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland, available on the web at http://www.unil.ch/biomapper/.
25. Holloway, G. J., Griffiths, G. H. & Richardson, P. 2003: Conservation strategy maps: a tool to facilitate biodiversity action planning illustrated using the heath fritillary butterfly. - Journal of Applied Ecology 40: 413-421.
26. Hortal, J., Garcia-Pereira, P. & García-Barros, E. 2004: Butterfly species richness in mainland Portugal: Predictive models of geographic distribution patterns. - Ecography 27: 68-82.
27. Jiménez-Valverde, A. & Lobo, J. M. 2007a: Potential distribution of the endangered spider Macrothele calpeiana (Walckenaer, 1805) (Araneae, Hexathelidae) and the impact of climate warming. - Acta Zoologica Sinica 53: 865-876.
28. Jiménez-Valverde, A. & Lobo, J. M. 2007b: Threshold criteria for conversion of probability of species presence to eitheror presence-absence. - Acta Oecologica 31: 361-369.
29. Jiménez-Valverde, A., Ortuño, V. M. & Lobo, J. M. 2007: Exploring the distribution of Sterocorax Ortuño, 1990 (Coleoptera, Carabidae) species in the Iberian Peninsula. - Journal of Biogeography 34: 1426-1438.
30. King, G. & Zeng, L. 2001: Logistic regression in rare events data. - Political Analysis 9: 137-163
31. Lobo, J. M., Verdú, J. R. & Numa, C. 2006: Environmental and geographical factors affecting the Iberian distribution of flightless Jekelius species (Coleoptera: Geotrupidae). - Diversity and Distributions 12: 179-188.
32. Martín, J. & Gurrea, P. 1990: The peninsular effect in Iberian butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea and Hesperioidea). - Journal of Biogeography 17: 85-96.
33. Martín, J. & Gurrea, P. 2003: La distribución de las zigenas (Lepidoptera, Zygaenidae) ibéricas: una consecuencia del efecto península. - Graellsia 59: 273-285.
34. Munguira, M. L. & Martín, J. 1993: The conservation of endangered lycaenid butterflies in Spain. - Biological Conservation 66: 17-22.
35. Munguira, M. L. & Martín, J. 1994: La conservación de las Maculinea españolas. - Butlletí Societat Catalana Lepidopterología 73: 20-28.
36. Munguira, M. L. & Martín, J. 1999: Action plan for Maculinea butterflies in Europe. - Nature and environment, No. 97, Council of Europe Publishing.
37. Munguira, M. L., García-Barros, E. & Martín, J. 1997: Plantas nutricias de los licénidos y satirinos españoles (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae y Nymphalidae).- Boletín de la Asociación española de Entomología 21: 29-53.
38. Munguira, M. L., Martín, J. & García-Barros, E. 2006: Maculinea nausithous (Bergsträsser, 1779). - In: Galante, E. & Verdú, J. R. (eds.), Libro Rojo de los Invertebrados de España: 227-228. Dirección General para la Biodiversidad, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid.
39. Nowicki, P., Witek, M., Skórka, P., Settele, J. & Woyciechowski, M. 2005a: Population ecology of the endan- gered butterflies Maculinea teleius and M. nausithous and its implications for conservation. - Population Ecology 47: 193-202.
40. Nowicki, P., Settele, J., Thomas, J. A. & Woyciechowski, M. 2005b: A review of population structure of Maculinea butterflies. - In: Settele, J., Kühn, E. & Thomas, J. A. (eds.), Studies on the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe, vol. 2. Species ecology along a European gradient: Maculinea butterflies as a model: 144-149. Pensoft, Sofia/Moscow.
41. Olden, J. D., Jackson, D. A. & Peres-Neto, P. 2002: Predictive models of fish species distributions: a note on proper validation and chance predictions. - Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 131: 329-336.
42. Peterson, A. T. 2006: Uses and requirements of ecological niche models and related distributional models. - Biodiversity Informatics 3: 59-72.
43. Peterson, A. T. & Papeş, M. 2006: Potential geographic distribution of the Bugun liocichla Liocichla bugunorum, a poorly-known species from north-eastern India. - Indian Birds 2: 146-149.
44. Pollard, E. & Yates, T. J. 1993: Monitoring butterflies for ecology and conservation. - Chapman & Hall, London.
45. R Development Core Team 2004: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. - R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, available on the web at http://www.R-project.org.
46. Raxworthy, C. J., Martínez-Meyer, E., Horning, N., Nussbaum, R. A., Schneider, G. E., Ortega-Huerta, M. A. & Peterson, A. T. 2003: Predicting distributions of known and unknown reptile species in Madagascar. - Nature 426:837-841.
47. Romo, H. & García-Barros, E. 2005: Distribución e intensidad de los estudios faunísticos sobre mariposas diurnas en la Península Ibérica e Mas Baleares (Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea y Hesperioidea). - Graellsia 81: 37-50.
48. Settele, J. 2005: How endangered is Maculinea nausithous? - In: Settele, J., Kühn, E. & Thomas, J. A. (eds.), Studies on the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe, vol. 2. Species ecology along a European gradient: Maculinea butterflies as a model: 230. Pensoft, Sofia/Moscow.
49. Sing, T., Sander, O., Beerenwinkel, N. & Lengauer, T. 2005: ROCR: Visualizing the performance of scoring classifiers. R package version 1.0-1. - R Foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria, available on the web at http://rocr.bioinf.mpi-sb.mpg.de.
50. Soberón, J. 2007: Grinnellian and Eltonian niches and geographic distribution of species. - Ecology Letters 10: 1115-1123.
51. Stockwell, D. R. B. & Peterson, A. T. 2002: Effects of sample size on accuracy of species distribution models. - Ecological Modelling 148: 1-13.
52. Thomas, J. A. 1980: Why did the large blue become extinct in Britain? - Oryx 15: 243-247.
53. Thomas, J. A., Elmes, G. W., Wardlaw, J. C. & Wovejechowski, M. 1989: Host specificity among Maculinea butterflies in Myrmica ant nests. - Oecologia 79: 452-457.
54. Vaughan, I. P. & Ormerod, J. 2005: The continuing challenges of testing species distribution models. - Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 720-730.
55. Wood, S. N. 2004: mgcv: GAMs with GCV smoothness estimation and GAMMs by REML/PQL. R package version 1.1-8. - R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, available on the web at http://www. R-project.org.
56. Wood, S. N. & Augustin, N. H. 2002: GAMs with integrated model selection using penalized regression splines and applications to environmental modelling. - Ecological Modelling 157: 157-177.
57. Wynhoff, I. 1998: The recent distribution of the European Maculinea species. - Journal of Insect Conservation 2: 15-27.