Acquiring semantic sibling associations from web documents

International Journal of Data Warehousing and Mining

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 83-98

  Brunzel, Marko ^a,b   Spiliopoulou, Myra ^b  

^a GERMAN RESEARCH CENTER FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DFKI   (Germany)

^b OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Co hyponymy; Mining semi structured data; Ontology learning; Semantic associations; Sibling relations

Indexed keywords

ONTOLOGY; SEARCH ENGINES; SEMANTICS; TREES (MATHEMATICS); WEB CRAWLER;

HYPONYMY; ONTOLOGY LEARNING; SEMANTIC ASSOCIATIONS; SEMI STRUCTURED DATA; SIBLING RELATIONS;

SEMANTIC WEB;

EID: 47349091794     PISSN: 15483924     EISSN: 15483932     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jdwm.2007100105     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Agirre, E.,Ansa, O., Hovy, E., & Martinez, D. (2000). Enriching very large ontologies using the www. Proceedings of the Workshop on Ontology Construction of the European Conference of AI (ECAI). Berlin, Germany.
2. Agrawal, R., Imielinski, T., & Swami,A. (1993, May). Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. Proceedings of the ACM Sigmod International Conference on Management of Data (pp. 207-216). Washington D.C.
3. Andreas Faatz, R. S. (2002). Ontology enrichment with texts from the www. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Semantic Web Mining, European Conference on Machine Learning 2002, Helsinki 2002.
4. Brunzel, M., & Spiliopoulou, M. (2006a). Discovering multi terms and co-hyponymy from xhtml documents with XTREEM. In R. Nayak & M. J. Zaki (Eds.), Kdxd (Vol. 3915, p. 22-32). Springer.
5. Brunzel, M., & Spiliopoulou, M.(2006b). Discovering semantic sibling associations from Web documents with XTREEM-SP. In A. M. Tjoa & J. Trujillo (Eds.), Dawak (Vol. 4081, p. 469-480). Springer.
6. Brunzel, M., & Spiliopoulou, M.(2006c). Discovering semantic sibling groups from Web documents with XTREEM-SG. In S. Staab & V. Svatek (Eds.), Ekaw (Vol. 4248, p. 141-157). Springer.
7. Buitelaar, P., Cimiano, P., & Magnini, B. (2005). Ontology learning from text: Methods, evaluation and applications (Vol. 123). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
8. Buttler, D. (2004). A short survey of document structure similarity algorithms. In H.R. Arabnia & O. Droegehorn (Eds.), International conference on internet computing (p. 3-9). CSREA Press.
9. Choi, I. H., Moon, B., & Kim, H. J. (2006). A clustering method based on path similarities of xml data. Data & Knowledge Engineering, pp.0-0, Feb. 2006.
10. Church, K. W., & Hanks, P. (1989). Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 76-83). Vancouver, B.C.: Association for Computational Linguistics.
11. Cimiano, P. (2006). Ontology teaming and population. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universitt Karlsruhe, Institut fr Angewandte Informatik und Formale Beschreibungsverfahren (AIFB).
12. Cimiano,P., & Staab, S. (2004). Learning by googling. SIGKDD Explorations, 6(2), 24-33.
13. Cimiano, P., & Staab, S. (2005, AUG). Learning concept hierarchies from text with a guided agglomerative clustering algorithm. In C. Biemann & G. Paas (Eds.), Proceedings of the ICML 2005 Workshop on Learning and Extending Lexical Ontologies with Machine Learning Methods. Bonn, Germany.
14. Dalamagas, T., Cheng, T., Winkel, K. J., & Sellis, T. (2006). A methodology for clustering xml documents by structure. Inf. Syst., 31(3), 187-228.
15. Ehrig, M., & Maedche, A. (2003). Ontology-focused crawling of Web documents.
16. Evert, S. (2004). The statistics of word cooccurrences: Word pairs and collocations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Stuttgart.
17. Faure, D., & Nedellec, C. (1999). Knowledge acquisition of predicate argument structures from technical texts using machine learning: The system asium. Ekaw '99: Proceedings of the 11th European Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management (pp. 329-334). London, UK: Springer-Verlag.
18. Gomez-Perez, A., & Manzano-Macho, D. (2003). A survey of ontology learning methods and techniques. deliverable 1.5, ontoWeb project (Tech. Rep.).
19. Hearst, M.A. (1992). Automatic acquisition of hyponyms from large text corpora. Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Computational Linguistics (pp. 539-545). Morristown, NJ, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
20. Heyer, G., Läuter, M., Quasthoff, U., Wittig, T., & Wolff, C. (2001). Learning relations using collocations. In A. Maedche, S. Staab, C. Nedellec, & E. H. Hovy (Eds.), Workshop on ontology learning (Vol. 38).
21. Kashyap, V. (1999). Design and creation of ontologies for environmental information retrieval. Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling, and Management. Alberta, Canada.
22. Kruschwitz, U. (2001a). Exploiting structure for intelligent Web search. Hicss '01: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (hicss-34)-volume 4 (pp. 4010). Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society.
23. Kruschwitz, U. (2001b). A rapidly acquired domain model derived from markup structure. Proceedings of the ESSLLI'01 Workshop on Semantic Knowledge Acquisition and Categorization, Helsinki, 2001.
24. Maedche, A. (2002). Ontology learning for the semantic Web. Boston, Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
25. Maedche, A., & Staab, S. (2001). Ontology learning for the semantic Web. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 16(2), 72-79. (The Ontology-Learning cycle - a framework for creating new ontologies)
26. Maedche, A., & Staab, S. (2000). Discovering conceptual relations from text. In Ecai-2000-Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 321-325). IOS Press, Amsterdam.
27. Manning, C. D., & Schütze, H. (1999). Foundations of statistical natural language processing. MIT Press.
28. Nayak, R., & Zaki, M. J. (2006). Knowledge discovery from xml documents. Pakdd 2006 workshop proceedings. LNCS, Springer-Verlag Heidelberg, Vol. 3915.
29. Quasthoff, U., & Wolff, C. (2002). The poisson collocation measure and its applications. The 2nd International Workshop on Computational Approaches to Collocations.
30. Shamsfard, M., & Barforoush, A. A. (2003). The state of the art in ontology learning: A framework for comparison. Knowl. Eng. Rev., 18(4), 293-316.
31. Shinzato, K., & Torisawa, K. (2004). Acquiring hyponymy relations from Web documents. In Hltnaacl (pp. 73-80).
32. Stojanovic, L., Stojanovic, N., & Volz, R. (2002). Migrating data-intensive Web sites into the semantic Web. Sac '02: Proceedings of the 2002 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (pp. 1100-1107). New York, NY, USA: ACM Press.
33. Tagarelli, A., & Greco, S. (2006). Toward semantic xml clustering. In J. Ghosh, D. Lambert, D. B. Skillicorn, & J. Srivastava (Eds.), Sdm (p. 188-199). SIAM.
34. Zhang, Z., Li, R., Cao, S., & Zhu, Y. (2003). Similarity metric for xml documents. Proceedings of the Workshop on Knowledge and Experience Management.