Corruption and bilateral aid: A dyadic approach

Journal of Conflict Resolution

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 507-526

  Schudel, Carl Jan Willem ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Corruption; Dyadic relationships; Foreign aid; OECD countries

Indexed keywords

EID: 47249166059     PISSN: 00220027     EISSN: 15528766     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022002708316646     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Akram, T. 2003. The international foreign aid regime: Who gets foreign aid and how much ? Applied Economics 35: 1351-6.
2. Alesina A., and D. Dollar. 2000. Who gives foreign aid to whom and why ? Journal of Economic Growth 5 (1). 33-63.
3. Alesina, A., and B. Weder. 2002. Do corrupt governments receive less foreign aid ? American Economic Review 92 (4). 1126-37.
4. Bardhan, P. 1997. Corruption and development: A review of issues. Journal of Economic Literature 35 (3). 1320-46.
5. Berthelmy, J.C. 2006. Bilateral donors' interest vs. recipients' development motives in aid allocation: Do all donors behave the same? Review of Development Economics 10 (2). 195-209.
6. Brambor, T., W.R. Clark, and M. Golder. 2006. Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analysis. Political Analysis 14 (1). 63-82.
7. Braumoeller, B.F. 2004. Hypothesis testing and multiplicative interaction terms. International Organization 58 (4). 807-20.
8. Brautigam, D.A., and S. Knack. 2004. Foreign aid, institutions, and governance in sub-Saharan Africa. Economic Development and Cultural Change 52 (2). 255-85.
9. Bueno de Mesquita, B., and A. Smith. 2007. Foreign aid and policy concessions. Journal of Conflict Resolution 51 (2). 251-84.
10. Burnside, C., and D. Dollar. 2000. Aid, policies, and growth. The American Economic Journal 90 (4). 847-68.
11. Central Intelligence Agency. 2007. The world factbook. https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/index.html (accessed October 17, 2007 ).
12. Elkins, Z., A.T. Guzman, and B.A. Simmons. 2006. Competing for capital: The diffusion of bilateral investment treaties. International Organization 60 (4). 811-46.
13. Gartzke, E., and E. Voeten. 2005. The affinity of nations: Similarity of state voting positions in the United Nations General Assembly. http://www.columbia.edu/∼eg589/ (accessed November 5, 2007 ).
14. Gleditsch, K.S. 2007. Distance between capital cities. http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/∼ksg/data-5.html (accessed November 5, 2007 ).
15. Global Issues. 2006. US and foreign aid assistance. http://www. globalissues.org/TradeRelated/Debt/USAid.asp#ForeignAidNumbersinChartsandGraphs (accessed February 7, 2008 ).
16. Goldsmith, A.A. 2001. Foreign aid and statehood in Africa. International Organization 55 (1). 123-48.
17. Hout, W. 2004. Political regimes and development assistance: The political economy of aid selectivity. Critical Asian Studies 36 (4). 591-613.
18. Hsiao, C. 2003. Analysis of panel data. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19. Kaufmann D., A. Kraay, and M. Mastruzzi. 2004. Governance matters III: Governance indicators for 1996, 1998, 2000, and 2002. World Bank Economic Review 18 (2). 253-87.
20. La Franiere, S. 2005. Africa tackles graft, with billions in aid in play. New York Times, July 6.
21. Lambsdorff, J.G. 2002. Making corrupt deals: Contracting in the shadow of the law. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization 48: 221-41.
22. Maizels A., and M.K. Nissanke. 1984. Motivations for aid to developing countries. World Development 12 (9). 879-900.
23. Mauro, P. 1995. Corruption and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 (3). 681-712.
24. McGillivray, M., and Oczkowski, E. 1992. A two-part sample selection model of British bilateral foreign-aid allocation. Applied Economics 24 (12). 1311-9.
25. McKinlay, R.D., and R. Little. 1977. A foreign policy model of U.S. bilateral aid allocation. World Politics 30 (1). 58-86.
26. Meernik, J., E.L. Krueger, and S.C. Poe. 1998. Testing models of U.S. foreign policy: Foreign aid during and after the cold war. Journal of Politics 60 (1). 63-85.
27. Neumayer, E. 2003. The pattern of aid giving. London: Routledge.
28. Neumayer, E., and L. Spess. 2005. Do bilateral investment treaties increase foreign direct investment to developing countries ? World Development 33 (10). 1567-85.
29. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2007. Global development indicators. http://www.esds.ac.uk/international (accessed October 17, 2007 ).
30. Plmper, T., and V.E. Troeger. 2007. Efficient estimation of time-invariant and rarely changing variables in finite sample panel analyses with unit fixed effects. Political Analysis 15: 124-39.
31. Plmper, T., V.E. Troeger, and P. Manow. 2005. Panel data analysis in comparative politics: Linking method to theory. European Journal of Political Research 44 (2). 327-54.
32. Political Risk Studies Group. 2007. International country risk guide. http://www.icrgonline.org (accessed July 11, 2007 ).
33. Rai, K.B. 1980. Foreign aid and voting in the United Nations General Assembly, 1967-1976. Journal of Peace Research 17 (3). 269-77.
34. Schraeder, P.J., S.W. Hook, and B. Taylor. 1998. Clarifying the foreign aid puzzle: A comparison of American, Japanese, French and Swedish aid flows. World Politics 50 (2). 294-323.
35. Shleifer, A., and R.W. Vishny. 1993. Corruption. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (3). 599-617.
36. Svensson, J. 2000. Foreign aid and rent-seeking. Journal of International Economics 51 (2). 437-61.
37. Transparency International. 2006. Corruption perception index. http://www.transparency.org (accessed July 11, 2007 ).
38. United Nations Organisation. 2007. United Nations common database. http://www.esds.ac.uk/international (accessed October 17, 2007 ).
39. U.S. State Department. 2008 a. Background note: Guyana. http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/1984.htm#history (accessed February 6, 2008 ).
40. - -. 2008 b. Background note: Niger. http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/ 5474.htm (accessed February 6, 2008 ).
41. Warren, M.E. 2004. What does corruption mean in a democracy ? American Journal of Political Science 48 (2). 328-43.
42. Washington Post. 2007. The Millennium Challenge: The president's foreign-aid innovation needs time and money before it can be judged, July 16, A14.