Spatial and temporal variations of actual soil water repellency and their influence on surface runoff

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 22, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 1976-1984

  Lemmnitz, Christine ^a,c   Kuhnert, M ^b   Bens, O ^a   Guntner A ^b   Merz, B ^b   Huttl R F ^a  

^a BRANDENBURG UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b GFZ GERMAN RESEARCH CENTRE FOR GEOSCIENCES   (Germany)

^c Staatsbetrieb Sachsenforst   (Germany)

Author keywords

Erosion; Hydrology; Hydrophobicity; Reclaimed mining area; Sandy soil; Soil water repellency; Surface runoff generation

Indexed keywords

CATCHMENTS; CONTACT ANGLE; GEOMORPHOLOGY; INFILTRATION; RUNOFF; SEEPAGE; SOIL MECHANICS; SOIL MOISTURE; SOILS; SUBSTRATES; UNDERWATER SOILS;

C ATCHMENT AREA; CATCHMENT SCALES; EFFECT OF WATER; EXPERIMENTAL SET UPS; GEOMORPHOLOGIC UNITS; HILL SLOPES; HYDROLOGICAL MODELLING; INFILTRATION PARAMETERS; METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS; RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS; RUNOFF GENERATION; SOIL WATER REPELLENCY (SWR); SPATIAL HETEROGENEITIES; SPATIAL VARIABILITY; SPATIO TEMPORAL DYNAMICS; SURFACE RUNOFF GENERATION; SURFACE RUNOFFS; TEMPORAL VARIABILITY; TEMPORAL VARIATIONS; TERRAIN CHARACTERISTICS; WATER DROP PENETRATION TIME (WDPT); WATER-REPELLENCY; WATER-REPELLENT SOILS;

HYDRAULIC MODELS;

CATCHMENT; HILLSLOPE; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; RUNOFF; SANDY SOIL; SOIL WATER; SPATIAL VARIATION; TEMPORAL VARIATION;

EID: 47249153177     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: 10991085     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.6782     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bachmann J, Horton R, Van der Ploeg RR, Woche S. 2000. Modified sessile drop method for assessing initial soil-water contact angle of sandy soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal 64: 564-567.
2. Biemelt D, Schapp A, Kleeberg A, Grünewald U. 2005. Overland flow, erosion, and related phosphorus and iron fluxes at plot scale: a case study from a non-vegetated lignite mining dump in Lusatia. Geoderma 129: 4-18.
3. Bisdom EBA, Dekker LW, Schoute JFT. 1993. Water repellency of sieve fractions from sandy soils and relationships with organic material and soil structure. Geoderma 56: 105-118.
4. Buczko U, Bens O. 2006. Assessing soil hydrophobicity and its variability through the soil profile using two different methods. Soil Science Society of America Journal 70: 718-727.
5. Buczko U, Bens O, Hüttl RF. 2005. Variability of soil water repellency in sandy forest soils with different stand structure under Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and beech (Fagus sylvatica). Geoderma 126: 317-336.
6. Buczko U, Bens O, Hüttl RF. 2006. Water infiltration and hydrophobicity in forest soils of a pine-beech transformation chronosequence. Journal of Hydrology 331: 383-395.
7. Burch GJ, Moore ID, Burns J. 1989. Soil hydrophobic effects on infiltration and catchment runoff. Hydrological Processes 3: 211-222.
8. Crockford H, Topalidis S, Richardson DP. 1991. Water repellency in a dry sclerophyll eucalypt forest - measurements and processes. Hydrological Processes 5: 405-420.
9. DeBano LF. 1981. Water repellent soils: a state-of-the-art. PSW-46, United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Berkeley, CA.
10. DeBano LF. 2000. Water repellency in soils: a historical overview. Journal of Hydrology 231-232: 4-32.
11. Dekker LW, Ritsema CJ. 1994. How water moves in a water repellent sandy soil. I. Potential and actual water repellency. Water Resources Research 30: 2507-2517.
12. Dekker LW, Ritsema CJ. 1996. Variation in water content and wetting patterns in Dutch water repellent peaty clay and clayey peat soils. Catena 28: 89-105.
13. Dekker LW, Doerr SH, Oostindie K, Ritsema CJ. 2001. Water repellency and critical soil water content in a dune sand. Soil Science Society of America Journal 66: 1667-1674.
14. Doerr SH, Shakesby RA, Walsh RPD. 2000. Soil water repellency: its causes, characteristics and hydro-geomorphological significance. Earth Science Reviews 51: 33-65.
15. Doerr SH, Ferreira A, Walsh PD, Shakesby RA, Leighton-Boyce G, Coelho C. 2003. Soil water repellency as a potential parameter in rainfall-runoff modelling: experimental evidence at point to catchment scales from Portugal. Hydrological Processes 17: 363-377.
16. Ferreira AJD, Coelho COA, Wash RPD, Shakesby RA, Ceballos A, Doerr SH. 2000. Hydrological implications of soil water-repellency in Eucalyptus globulus forests, north-central Portugal. Journal of Hydrology 231-232: 165-177.
17. Fettweis U, Bens O, Hüttl RF. 2005. Accumulation and properties of soil organic carbon at reclaimed sites in the Lusatian lignite mining district afforested with Pinus spec. Geoderma 129: 81-91.
18. Franco CMM, Clarke PJ, Tate ME, Oades JM. 2000. Hydrophobic properties and chemical characterisation of natural water repellent materials in Australian sands. Journal of Hydrology 231-232: 47-58.
19. Gerke HH, Hangen E, Schaaf W, Hüttl RF. 2001. Spatial variability of potential water repellency in a lignitic mine soil afforested with Pinus nigra. Geoderma 102: 255-274.
20. ISS Working Group WRB. 2006. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2006, 2nd edition. World Soil Reports No. 103. FAO: Rome.
21. Jungerius PD, de Jong JH. 1989. Variability of water repellence in the dunes along the Dutch coast. Catena 16: 491-497.
22. Jungerius PD, Ten-Harkel MJ. 1994. The effect of rainfall intensity on surface runoff and sediment yield in the grey dunes along the Dutch coast under conditions of limited rainfall acceptance. Catena 23: 253-268.
23. Keizer JJ, Coelho COA, Ferreira AJD, Matias MJS, Ruiz C, Domingues CSP, Perez IMB, Malvar MC, Ferrari K, Boulet AK. 2002. Erosion implications of soil water repellency in a pine and eucalyptus forest stand in the coastal zone of central Portugal. In Littoral 2002, The Changing Coast, EUROCOAST/EUCC, Porto, Portugal; 591-600.
24. Kidron GJ, Yaalon DH, Vonshak A. 1999. Two causes for runoff initiation on microbiotic crusts: hydrophobicity and pore clogging. Soil Science 164: 18-27.
25. Letey J. 1969. Measurement of contact angle, water drop penetration time, and critical surface tension. In Symposium on Water Repellent Soils, University of California, Riverside; 43-47.
26. Letey J, Carrillo MLK, Pang XP. 2003. Characterizing the degree of repellency. In Soil Water Repellency: Occurrence, Consequences, and Amelioration, Ritsema CJ, Dekker LW (eds). Elsevier: Amsterdam.
27. Ma'shum M, Farmer VC. 1985. Origin and assessment of water repellency of a sandy Australian soil. Australian Journal of Soil Research 23: 623-626.
28. McGhie DA, Posner AM. 1980. Water repellence of a heavy-textured Western Australia surface soil. Australian Journal of Soil Research 18: 309-323.
29. Ritsema CJ, Dekker LW. 2000. Preferential flow in water repellent sandy soils: principles and modelling implication. Journal of Hydrology 231-232: 308-319.
30. Shakesby RA, Doerr SH, Walsh RPD. 2000. The erosional impact of soil hydrophobicity: current problems and future research directions. Journal of Hydrology 231-232: 178-191.
31. Sharma PP, Carter FS, Halvorson GA. 1993. Water retention by soils containing coal. Soil Science Society of America Journal 57: 311-316.
32. Täumer K, Stoffregen H, Wessolek G. 2005. Determination of repellency distribution using soil organic matter and water content. Geoderma 125: 107-115.
33. Wallis MG, Horne DJ. 1991. Soil water repellency. Advances in Soil Science 20: 92-146.
34. Wendling U, Fuchs G, Müller-Westermeier G. 1999. Mittlere jährliche Verdunstungshöhe als Gras-Referenzverdunstung. Hydrologischer Atlas von Deutschland 2.12. Bundesministerium für Umwelt: Bonn.
35. Witter JV, Jungerius PD, Ten-Harkel MJ. 1991. Modelling water erosion and the impact of water repellency. Catena 18: 115-124.