Small animal MRI: Clinical MRI as an interface to basic biomedical research;Experimentelle kleintier-MRT: Klinische MRT-systeme als schnittstelle zur biomedizinischen grundlagenforschung

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 180, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 505-513

  Pinkernelle, Jens Georg ^a   Stelter, L ^a   Hamm, B ^a   Teichgraber U ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Equipment; Molecular imaging; MR imaging; Technical aspects

Indexed keywords

FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18;

ARTIFACT; COMPUTER ASSISTED EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DEVICE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; EQUIPMENT; EXPERIMENTAL ANIMAL; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING; MAGNETIC FIELD; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MOLECULAR IMAGING; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOFREQUENCY; REVIEW; SEMICONDUCTOR; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; TUMOR DIAGNOSIS; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EXPERIMENTAL NEOPLASM; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; MOUSE; PATHOLOGY; RAT;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, LABORATORY; ARTIFACTS; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MICE; NEOPLASMS, EXPERIMENTAL; RATS;

EID: 47249145602     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1027290     Document Type: Review

References (58)

1. Bottomley PA. In vivo tumor discrimination in a rat by proton nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer Res 1979; 39: 468-470
2. Hansen G, Crooks LE, Davis P et al. In vivo imaging of the rat anatomy with nuclear magnetic resonance. Radiology 1980; 136: 695-700
3. Service RF. Biological imaging. Scanners get a fix on lab animals. Science 1999; 286: 2261-2263
4. Lewis JS, Achilefu S, Garbow JR et al. Small animal imaging. Current technology and perspectives for oncological imaging. Eur J Cancer 2002; 38: 2173-2188
5. Grimm J, Wunder A. Molekulare Bildgebung: Stand der Forschung. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2005; 177: 326-337
6. Behe M, Keil B, Alfke H et al. Kombinierte radiologische und nuklearmedizinische Bildgebung in Tierexperimenten: Ein Überblick über die aktuellen Möglichkeiten. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2007; 179: 796-803
7. Stelter L, Amthauer H, Rexin A et al. An Orthotopic Model of Pancreatic Somatostatin Receptor (SSTR)-Positive Tumors Allows Bimodal Imaging Studies Using 3T MRI and Animal PET-Based Molecular Imaging of SSTR Expression. Neuroendocrinology 2007; Epub ahead of print
8. Gemeinhardt O, Ludemann L, Prochnow D et al. Differentiation of prostate cancer from normal prostate tissue in an animal model: conventional MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2005; 177: 935-939
9. Luciani A, Parouchev A, Smirnov P et al. In vivo imaging of transplanted hepatocytes with a 1.5-T clinical MRI system-initial experience in mice. Eur Radiol 2007; 18: 59-69
10. Schäfer R, Wiskirchen J, Guo et al. Aptamer-Based Isolation and Subsequent Imaging of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Ischemic Myocard by Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2007; 179: 1009-1015
11. Shapiro EM, Gonzalez-Perez O, Garcia-Verdugo M et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the migration of neuronal precursors generated in the adult rodent brain. Neuroimage 2006; 32: 1150-1157
12. Torrente Y, Belicchi M, Marchesi C et al. Autologous transplantation of muscle-derived CD133 + stem cells in Duchenne muscle patients. Cell Transplant 2007; 16: 563-577
13. Pomper MG, Lee JS. Small animal imaging in drug development. Curr Pharm Des 2005; 11: 3247-3272
14. Muruganandham M, Lupu M, Dyke JP et al. Preclinical evaluation of tumor microvascular response to a novel antiangiogenic/antitumor agent RO 0281501 by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI at 1.5 T. Mol Cancer Ther 2006; 5: 1950-1957
15. Simon G, Drup-Link H, von Vopelius-Feldt J et al. MRT der Arthritis mit dem USPIO SH U555 C: Optimierung des T1-Enhancements. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2006; 178: 200-206
16. Acara MA, Mazurchuk RJ, Nickerson PA et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology of hydronephrosis in the rat. Magn Reson Imaging 1991; 9: 89-92
17. Fiel RJ, Alletto JJ, Severin CM et al. MR imaging of normal rat brain at 0.35 T and correlated histology. J Magn Reson Imaging 1991; 1: 651-656
18. Button TM, Fiel RJ, Goldrosen M et al. Small animal MRI at 0.35 Tesla: growth and morphology of intra-organ murine tumors. Magn Reson Imaging 1990; 8: 505-509
19. Oweida AJ, Dunn EA, Karlik SJ et al. Iron-oxide labeling of hematogenous macrophages in a model of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and the contribution to signal loss in fast imaging employing steady state acquisition (FIESTA) images. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 26: 144-151
20. Mandeville JB, Jenkins BG, Kosofsky BE et al. Regional sensitivity and coupling of BOLD and CBV changes during stimulation of rat brain. Magn Reson Med 2001; 45: 443-447
21. Stroh A, Faber C, Neuberger T et al. In vivo detection limits of magnetically labeled embryonic stem cells in the rat brain using high-field (17.6 T) magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage 2005; 24: 635-645
22. Edelstein WA, Glover GH, Hardy CJ et al. The intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio in NMR imaging. Magn Reson Med 1986; 3: 604-618
23. Barker PB, Hearshen DO, Boska MD. Single-voxel proton MRS of the human brain at 1.5T and 3.0T. Magn Reson Med 2001; 45: 765-769
24. Schmidt GP, Wintersperger B, Graser A et al. High-resolution whole-body magnetic resonance imaging applications at 1.5 and 3 Tesla: a comparative study. Invest Radiol 2007; 42: 449-459
25. Beuf O, Jaillon F, Saint-Jalmes H. Small-animal MRI: signal-to-noise ratio comparison at 7 and 1.5 T with multiple-animal acquisition strategies. MAGMA 2006; 19: 202-208
26. Schindera ST, Merkle EM, Dale BM et al. Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T what is the ultimate gain in signal-to-noise ratio? Acad Radiol 2006; 13: 1236-1243
27. Szeglowski SD, Hornak JP. Asymmetric single-turn solenoid for MRI of the wrist. Magn Reson Med 1993; 30: 750-753
28. Turner R. Gradient coil design: a review of methods. Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 11: 903-920
29. Robson MD, Gore JC, Constable RT. Measurement of the point spread function in MRI using constant time imaging. Magn Reson Med 1997; 38: 733-740
30. Rossmann K. Point spread-function, line spread-function, and modulation transfer function. Tools for the study of imaging systems. Radiology 1969; 93: 257-272
31. Bernstein MA, Huston III J, Ward HA. Imaging artifacts at 3.0T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24: 735-746
32. Schmidt GP, Wintersperger B, Graser A et al. High-resolution whole-body magnetic resonance imaging applications at 1.5 and 3 Tesla: a comparative study. Invest Radiol 2007; 42: 449-459
33. Brockmann MA, Ulmer S, Leppert J et al. Analysis of mouse brain using a clinical 1.5 T scanner and a standard small loop surface coil. Brain Res 2006; 1068: 138-142
34. de Lussanet QG, Beets-Tan RG, Backes WH et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 Tesla with gadopentetate dimeglumine to assess the angiostatic effects of anginex in mice. Eur J Cancer 2004; 40: 1262-1268
35. Wolf RF, Lam KH, Mooyaart EL et al. Magnetic resonance imaging using a clinical whole body system: an introduction to a useful technique in small animal experiments. Lab Anim 1992; 26: 222-227
36. Weissleder R, Moore A, Mahmood U et al. In vivo magnetic resonance imaging of transgene expression. Nat Med 2000; 6: 351-355
37. Xu S, Gade TP, Matei C et al. In vivo multiple-mouse imaging at 1.5 T. Magn Reson Med 2003; 49: 551-557
38. Moore A, Marecos E, Bogdanov A et al. Tumoral distribution of long-circulating dextran-coated iron oxide nanoparticles in a rodent model. Radiology 2000; 214: 568-574
39. Smirnov P, Gazeau F, Lewin M et al. In vivo cellular imaging of magnetically labeled hybridomas in the spleen with a 1.5-T clinical MRI system. Magn Reson Med 2004; 52: 73-79
40. Schild H. Clinical highfield MR. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2005; 177: 621-631
41. Ittrich H, Lange C, Tögel F et al. In Vivo Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Iron Oxide Labeled, Arterially-Injected Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Kidneys of Rats With Acute Ischemic Kidney Injury: Detection and Monitoring at 3T. JMRI 2007; 25: 1179-1191
42. Jordan A, Scholz R, Maier-Hauff K et al. The effect of thermotherapy using magnetic nanoparticles on rat malignant glioma. J Neurooncol 2006; 78: 7-14
43. Bock NA, Konyer NB, Henkelman RM. Multiple-mouse MRI. MRM 2003; 49: 158-167
44. Thunemann AF, Schutt D, Kaufner L et al. Maghemite nanoparticles protectively coated with poly(ethylene imine) and poly(ethylene oxide)-block-poly(glutamic acid). Langmuir 2006; 22: 2351-2357
45. Cook LL, Foster PJ, Karlik SJ. Pathology-guided MR analysis of acute and chronic experimental allergic encephalomyelitis spinal cord lesions at 1.5T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 22: 180-188
46. Fink C, Kiessling F, Bock M et al. High-resolution three-dimensional MR angiography of rodent tumors: morphologic characterization of intratumoral vasculature. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 18: 59-65
47. Heyn C, Ronald JA, Ramadan SS et al. In vivo MRI of cancer cell fate at the single-cell level in a mouse model of breast cancer metastasis to the brain. Magn Reson Med 2006; 56: 1001-1010
48. Heyn C, Ronald JA, MacKenzie LT et al. In vivo magnetic resonance imaging of single cells in mouse brain with optical validation. Magn Reson Med 2006; 55: 23-29
49. Dunn EA, Weaver LC, Dekaban GA et al. Cellular imaging of inflammation after experimental spinal cord injury. Mol Imaging 2005; 4: 53-62
50. Oweida AJ, Dunn EA, Foster PJ. Cellular imaging at 1.5 T: detecting cells in neuroinflammation using active labeling with superparamagnetic iron oxide. Mol Imaging 2004; 3: 85-95
51. Mayer D, Zahr NM, Adalsteinsson E et al. In vivo fiber tracking in the rat brain on a clinical 3T MRI system using a high strength insert gradient coil. Neuroimage 2007; 35: 1077-1085
52. Brau AC, Hedlund LW, Johnson GA. Cine magnetic resonance microscopy of the rat heart using cardiorespiratory-synchronous projection reconstruction. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 20: 31-38
53. Franco F, Dubois SK, Peshock RM et al. Magnetic resonance imaging accurately estimates LV mass in a transgenic mouse model of cardiac hypertrophy. Am J Physiol 1998; 274: H679-H683
54. Jones JR, Mata JF, Yang Z et al. Left ventricular remodeling subsequent to reperfused myocardial infarction: evaluation of a rat model using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2002; 4: 317-326
55. Oshinski JN, Yang Z, Jones JR et al. Imaging time after Gd-DTPA injection is critical in using delayed enhancement to determine infarct size accurately with magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2001; 104: 2838-2842
56. Ivancevic MK, Daire JL, Hyacinthe JN et al. High-resolution complementary spatial modulation of magnetization (CSPAMM) rat heart tagging on a 1.5 Tesla Clinical Magnetic Resonance System: a preliminary feasibility study. Invest Radiol 2007; 42: 204-210
57. Holoday DA, Fiserova-Bergerova V, Latto IP et al. Resistance of isoflurane to biotransformation in man. Anesthesiology 1975; 43: 325-332
58. Fueger BJ, Czernin J, Hildebrandt I et al. Impact of animal handling on the results of F-18 FDG PET studies in mice. J Nucl Med 2006; 47: 999-1006