"Biologic width" and crestal bone remodeling with sintered porous-surfaced dental implants: A study in dogs

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 544-550

  Deporter, Douglas ^a   Al Sayyed, Arwa ^b   Pilliar, Robert M ^a   Valiquette, Nancy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b The General Directorate of Armed Forces Health Services   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

Biologic width; Bone remodeling; Collar height; Sintered porous surfaced dental implants

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE REMODELING; DOG; GINGIVA; HISTOLOGY; OSTEOLYSIS; POROSITY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ANIMALS; BONE REMODELING; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DOGS; GINGIVA; POROSITY;

EID: 47249134203     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Gomez-Roman G. Influence of flap design on peri-implant inter-proximal crestai bone loss around single-tooth implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;6:61-67.
2. Spray JR, Black CG, Morris HF, Ochi S. Influence of bone thickness on facial marginal bone response: Stage 1 placement through stage 2 uncovering. Ann Periodontol 2000;5:119-128.
3. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockier B, et al. Marginal tissue reactions at osseointegrated titanium fixtures. A three-year longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986;15:39-52.
4. Rieger MR, Mayberry M, Brose MO. Finite element analysis of six endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:671-676.
5. Oyonarte R, Deporter DA, Pilliar RM,Woodside DG. Periimplant bone response to orthodontic loading. Part 2: Implant surface geometry and its effect on regional bone remodeling. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:182-189.
6. Pilliar RM, Deporter DA,Watson PA, Valiquette N. Dental implant design: Effect on bone remodeling. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:467-483.
7. Vaillancourt H, Pilliar RM, McCammond D. Factors affecting crestai bone loss with dental implants partially covered with a porous coating. A finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:351-359.
8. Wiskott HW, Belser UC. Lack of integration of smooth titanium surfaces: A working hypothesis based on strains generated in the surrounding bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10:429-444.
9. Hermann JS, Buser D, Schenk RK, Cochran DL.Crestai bone changes around titanium implants. A histometrlc evaluation of unloaded, non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 2000;71:1412-1424.
10. Hermann JS, Schoolfield JD, Schenk RK, Buser D. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestai bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 2001,72:1372-1383.
11. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Wennstrom J, Lindhe J. The periimplant hard and soft tissues at different implant systems. A comparative study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996; 7:212-219.
12. Berglundh T, Lindhe J, Ericsson I, Marinello CP, Liljenberg B, Thomsen P. The soft tissue barrier at implants and teeth. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991;2:81-90.
13. Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Dimension of the peri-implant mucosa. Biological width revisited. J Clin Periodontol 1996;23:971-973.
14. Al-Sayyed A, Deporter DA, Pilliar RM, et al. Predictable crestal bone remodelling around two porous-coated titanium alloy dental implant designs. A radiographic study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:131-141.
15. Deporter DA, Watson PA, Pilliar RM. Chipman M, Valiquette N. A histological comparison in the dog of porous-surfaced vs threaded dental implants. J Dent Res 1990;69:1138-1145.
16. Deporter DA, Watson PA, Pilliar RM, et al. A histological assessment of the initial healing response adjacent to porous-surfaced, titanium alloy dental implants in dogs. J Dent Res 1986; 65:1064-1070.
17. Pilliar RM, Deporter DA, Watson PA, et al. The effect of partial coating with hydroxyapatite on bone remodelling in relation to porous-surfaced titanium alloy dental implants in dogs. J Dent Res 1991;70:1338-1345.
18. Rokni S. Todescan R, Watson P, Pharoah M. Adegbembo AO, Deporter D. An assessment of crown-to-implant root ratios with short sintered porous-surfaced implant-borne prostheses In partial edentulism. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20:69-76.
19. Deporter DA, Watson PA, Pharoah M, Todescan R. Tomlinson G. Ten-year results of a prospective study using porous-surfaced dental implants and a mandibular overdenture. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2002;4:183-189.
20. Caulier H, Naert I, Kalk W, Jansen JA.The relationship of some histologic parameters, radiographic evaluations,and Periotest measurements of oral implants: An experimental animal study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:380-386.
21. Hermann JS, Cochran D, Nummikoski P, Buser D. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A radiographic evaluation of unloaded nonsubmerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 1997;68:1117-1130.
22. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. The mucosal barrier following abutment dis/reconnection. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:568-572.
23. Comut AA, Weber HR, Shortkroff S, Cui FZ, Spector M. Connective tissue orientation around dental implants in a canine model.Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:433-440.
24. Abrahamsson I, Zitzmann NU, Berglundh T, Linder E, Wennerberg A, Lindhe J. The mucosal attachment to titanium implants with different surface characteristics: An experimental study in dogs.J Clin Periodontol 2002;29:448-455.
25. Schlerano G, Ramieri G, Córtese MG, Aimetti M, Preti G. Organization of the connective tissue barrier around long-term loaded implant abutments in man. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13;460-464.
26. Inoue T, Cox JE, Pilliar RM, Melcher AM. Effect of the surface geometry of smooth and porous-surfaced titanium alloy on the orientation of fibroblasts in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res 1987;21:107-126.
27. Pilliar RM, Cameron HU, Binnington AG. Radiographic and morphologic studies of load-bearing porous surface-structured implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1981;156:249-257.
28. Hermann JS, Buser D, Schenk RK, Scholfield JD,Cochran DL. Biologic width around one- and two-piece titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:559-571.
29. MacDonald K, Pharoah M, Todescan R, Deporter DA. Use of sintered porous-surfaced dental implants to restore single teeth in the maxilla: A 7 to 9 year follow-up. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006 (in press).