Model-driven derivation of product architectures

ASE'07 - 2007 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 469-472

  Botterweck, Goetz ^a   O'Brien, Liam ^b   Thiel, Steffen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIMERICK   (Ireland)

^b CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

ATL; model transformation; model driven approaches; product derivation; software architectures; software product lines

Indexed keywords

ATLAS TRANSFORMATION LANGUAGES; FEATURE CONFIGURATION; HIGH-QUALITY PRODUCTS; MODEL DRIVEN APPROACH; MODEL TRANSFORMATION; MODEL-DRIVEN; PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE; PRODUCT DERIVATION; PRODUCT LINE ARCHITECTURE; SOFTWARE PRODUCT LINE; SOFTWARE PRODUCT LINES; TIME-TO-MARKET;

AUTOMATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE;

SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 47249105972     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1321631.1321711     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. ATL Home page. http://www.eclipse.org/m2m/atl/
2. xADL 2.0. http://www.isr.uci.edu/projects/xarchuci/
3. Clements, P.C. and Northrop, L. Software Product Lines: Practices and Patterns. Addison-Wesley, 2001.
4. Czarnecki, K. and Antkiewicz, M. Mapping Features to Models: A Template Approach Based on Superimposed Variants. GPCE'05. 422-437.
5. Czarnecki, K. and Eisenecker, U.W. Generative programming. Addison-Wesley, 2000.
6. Czarnecki, K., Helsen, S. and Eisenecker, U. Formalizing Cardinality-based Feature Models and their Specialization. Software Process Improvement and Practice (Best papers from SPLC04), 10 (1). 7-29.
7. Gomaa, H. Designing software product lines with UML : from use cases to pattern-based software architectures. Addison-Wesley, Boston, 2005.
8. Hotz, L., Wolter, K., Krebs, T., Deelstra, S., Sinnema, M., Nijhuis, J. and MacGregor, J. Configuration in Industrial Product Families: The ConIPF Methodology. IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006.
9. Kang, K., Cohen, S., Hess, J., Novak, W. and Peterson, S. Feature-Oriented Domain Analysis (FODA) Feasibility Study, SEI, Carnegie Mellon University, 1990.
10. OMG. UML 2.0 Superstructure Specification, 2005. http://www.omg.org/cgi- bin/doc?formal/05-07-04
11. Pohl, K., Böckle, G. and Linden, F.v.d. Software Product Line Engineering : Foundations, Principles, and Techniques. Springer, New York, NY, 2005.
12. pure-systems GmbH Variant Management. http://www.puresystems.com/Variant- Management.49.0.html
13. SAE The SAE AADL Standard Info Site. http://www.aadl.info/
14. Wagelaar, D. MDE Case Studies, 2007. http://ssel.vub.ac.be/ssel/research: mdd:casestudies