Perception of contemporary rural landscape by its future managers: Czech and Japanese students of landscape planning

Ekologia Bratislava

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 196-211

  Lapka, Miloslav ^a,b   Cudlínová, Eva ^a,c   Kindlmann, Pavel ^a   Dobiášová, Berenika ^a,c  

^a INSTITUTE OF LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY   (Czech Republic)

^b CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH BOHEMIA   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Aesthetical value; Contingent valuation method (CVM); Landscape changes; Landscape perception; Willingness to pay (WTP)

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRIALIZATION; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; MANMADE STRUCTURE; PERCEPTION; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; RURAL AREA; STUDENT;

EID: 47249105958     PISSN: 1335342X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Akbar, K.F., Hale, W.H.G., Headley, A.D., 2003: Assessment of scenic beauty of the roadside vegetation in northern England. Landsc. Urban Plann., 63: 139-144.
2. Aoki, Y., 1999: Trends in the study of the psychological evaluation of landscape. Landscape Research, 24: 85-94.
3. Aoki, Y., Chen, M.S., Kim, D.P., Sakakibara, E., 2003: Preservation of landscape from the viewpoint of "Eight Scenery" in China, Korea and Japan. Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture, International Editión, 2: 67-72.
4. Appleton, J., 1996: The experience of landscape. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., London, UK.
5. Arler, F., 2000: Aspects of landscape or nature quality. Landsc. Ecol., 15: 291-302.
6. Arriaza, M., Cañas-Ortega, J.F., Cañas-Madueño, J.A., Ruiz-Aviles P., 2004: Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes. Landsc. Urban Plann., 69: 115-125.
7. Arthur, L.M., Daniel, T.C., Boster, R.S., 1977: Scenic assessment: an overview. Landscape Planning, 4: 109-129.
8. Boucníková E., Kučera, T., 2006 : How natural and cultural aspects influence land cover changes in Czech Republic? Ekológia (Bratislava), 24, Suppl. 1: 53-69.
9. Bourassa, S.C., 1990: A paradigm for landscape aesthetics. Environment and Behaviour, 22: 787-812.
10. Briggs, D.J., France, J., 1980: Landscape evaluation: a comparative study. J. Environ. Manag., 10: 263-275.
11. Bruckmeier, K., Kopytina, M.A., 2001: Post-traditional or post-modern rurality? Cases from East Germany and Russia. In Granberg, L., Kovách, I., Tovey, H. (eds), Europe's green ring, perspectives on rural policy and planning. Ashgate, Aldershot, Burlington, Singapore, Sydney, p. 167-197.
12. Buhyoff, G.J., Riesenmann, M.F., 1979: Experimental manipulation of dimensionality in landscape preference judgments: a quantitative validation. Leisure Science, 2: 221-238.
13. Cudlín, P., Prokopová, M., Francírková, T., Burešová, R., Smrž, T., Boucníková, E., 2006: System NATURA 2000 utilization for purposes of biotope valuation. Ekológia (Bratislava), 24, Suppl. 1: 40-52.
14. Dearden, P., 1980: A statistical technique for the evaluation of the visual quality of the landscape for land-use planning purposes. J. Environ. Manag., 10: 51-68.
15. Dunn, M.C., 1976: Landscape with photographs: testing the preference approach to landscape evaluation. J. Environ. Manag., 4: 15-26.
16. Forman, R.T.T., 1997: Land mosaics, the ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
17. Hunziker, M., Kienast, F, 1999: Potential impactcs of changing agricultural activities on scenic beauty - a prototypical technique for automated rapid assessment. Landsc. Ecol., 14: 161-176.
18. Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S., 1989: The experience of nature: a psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
19. Klijn, J., Vos, W., 2000: From landscape ecology to the landscape science. Kluwer Academic Publishers WLO, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
20. Lapka, M., Cudlínová, E., 2003: Landscape changes and landscape scenery: social approach. Ekológia (Bratislava), 22, 4: 364-375.
21. Lapka, M., Cudlínová, E, 2004: Perception of landscapes: possible integrating tool for landscape research. Ekológia (Bratislava), 23, Suppl. 1: 170-178.
22. Law, C.S., Zube, E.H., 1983: Effects of photographic composition on landscape perception. Landscape Research, 8: 22-23.
23. Lipský, Z., Kopecký, M., Kvapil, D., 1999: Present land use changes in the Czech cultural landscape. Ekológia (Bratislava), 18, 1: 31-38.
24. Ot'ahel', J., 1999: Visual landscape perception: landscape pattern and aesthetic assessment. Ekológia (Bratislava), 18, 1: 63-74.
25. Pérez, J.G., 2002: Ascertaining landscape perceptions and preferences with pair-wise photographs: planning rural tourism in Extremadura. Spain. Landscape Research, 27: 297-308.
26. Pietrzak, M., 1999: Knowledge about landscape perception as a tool for tourism management. Ekológia (Bratislava), 18, 1: 75-81.
27. Polakowski, K.J., 1974: Landscape assessment of the Upper Great Lakes basin resources: a macro-geomorphic and micro-composition analysis. In Zube, E.N., Brush, R.O., Fabos, J.G. (eds), Landscape assessment: Values, perceptions and resources. Dowden Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsburg, PA, p. 203-219.
28. nd ed.). Wiley & Sons Ltd, New York, USA, 434 pp.
29. Ribe, R.G., 1982: On the possibility of quantifying scenic beauty - a response. Landscape Planning, 9: 64-74.
30. Shafer Jr., E.L., Brush, R.O., 1977: How to measure preferences for photographs of natural landscapes. Landscape Planning, 4: 237-256.
31. Shuttleworth, S., 1980a: The evaluation of landscape quality. Landscape Research, 5: 14-20.
32. Shuttleworth, S., 1980b: The use of photographs as an environmental presentation medium in landscape studies. J. Environ. Manag., 11: 61-76.
33. Sklenička, P., 2002: Temporal changes in pattern of one agricultural Bohemian landscape during the period 1938-1998. Ekológia (Bratislava), 21: 181-191.
34. Tahvanainen, L., Ihalainen, M., Hietala-Koivu, R., Kolehmainen, O., Tyrväinen, L., Nousiainen, I., Helenius, J., 2002: Measures of the EU Agri-Environmental Protection Scheme (GAEPS) and their impacts on the visual acceptability of Finnish agricultural landscapes. J. Environ. Manag., 66: 213-227.
35. Takeuchi, K., Brown, R.D., Washitani, I., Tsunekawa, A., Yokohari, M. (eds), 2003: Satoyama. The traditional rural landscape of Japan. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 229 pp.
36. Wherrett, J.R., 2000: Creating landscape preference models using the Internet as a medium for surveys. Landscape Research, 25: 79-96.
37. Willis, K.,1994: Contingent valuation in a policy context. Landscape Research, 19: 17-20.
38. Zar, J.H., 1984: Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall Press, New Yersey, 718 pp.
39. Zonneveld, I.S., 1995: Land ecology: an introduction to landscape ecology as abase for land evaluation, land management and conservation. SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam, 199 pp.
40. Zube, E.H., Pitt, D.G., 1981: Cross-cultural perceptions of scenic and heritage landscape. Landscape Planning, 8: 69-87.
41. Zube, E.H., Sell, J.L, Taylor, J.G, 1982: Landscape perception - research, application and theory. Landscape Planning, 9: 1-33.