Let’s get real: Developing realist approaches within the philosophy of social science

South African Journal of Philosophy

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 211-222

  Crothers, Charles ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU NATAL   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 47249104413     PISSN: 02580136     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02580136.1999.10878184     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bhaskar, Roy. 1979. The possibility of naturalism. Sussex: Harvester Press.
2. Bhaskar, Roy. 1989. Reclaiming reality. London: Verso.
3. Bohman, James. 1991. The new philosophy of social science. Cambridge: Polity Press.
4. Harré, R. 1979. Social being. Oxford: Blackwell.
5. Keat, Russell & Urry, John. 1975. Social theory as science. London: Routledge [1981: 2nd edition with a Postscript]
6. Layder, Derek. 1990. The realist image in social science. New York: St Martin’s Press.
7. Manicas, Peter. 1987. A history and philosophy of the social sciences. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
8. Mouzelis, Nicos. 1995. Sociological theory: what went wrong? London: Routledge.
9. Outhwaite, William. 1987. New philosophies of social science: realism, hermeneutics and critical theory. Hampshire: MacMillan.
10. Outhwaite, William. 1996. The philosophy of social science, in Bryan Turner (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to social theory. London: Basil Blackwell.
11. Putnam, Hilary. 1990. Realism with human face.Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Pr.
12. Rosenberg, A. 1988. Philosophy of social science. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
13. Sayer, Andrew. 1984[1992]. Method in social science: a realist approach. London: Routledge.
14. Touraine, Alain. 1964. Towards a sociology of action, in A. Giddens (Ed.), Postivism and sociology. London: Heinemann.
15. Wilson, John.1982. Social theory. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.