Assessment of aortic stenosis after aortic valve replacement: Comparative evaluation of dual-source CT and echocardiography;Quantitative evaluation der aortenklappenöffnungsfläche mit der dual-source-CT und korrelation mit der 2D-echokardiografie: Initiale ergebnisse

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 180, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 553-560

  Saam, Tobias ^a   Oberhoffer, M ^b   Rist, C ^b   Minaifar, N ^a   Vogt, F ^b   Reichart, B ^b   Becker, C ^a   Reiser, M ^a   Nikolaou, K ^a  

^a LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Aortic valve; CT spiral; Echocardiography

Indexed keywords

IOPROMIDE;

ADULT; AGED; AORTA STENOSIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; CALCIFICATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RESTENOSIS; RISK FACTOR; STANDARD; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SYSTOLE; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; BIOPROSTHESIS; CALCINOSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EQUIPMENT; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BIOPROSTHESIS; CALCINOSIS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 47249093789     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1027288     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Kuettner A et al. Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual-source computed tomography - initial experience. Eur J Radiol 2006; 57: 331-335
2. Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H et al. First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 256-268
3. Johnson TR, Nikolaou K, Wintersperger BJ et al. Dual-source CT cardiac imaging: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 1409-1415
4. Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A et al. Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: First experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 2739-2747
5. Alkadhi H, Wildermuth S, Plass A et al. Aortic stenosis: comparative evaluation of 16-detector row CT and echocardiography. Radiology 2006; 240: 47-55
6. Feuchtner GM, Muller S, Bonatti J et al. Sixty-four slice CT evaluation of aortic stenosis using planimetry of the aortic valve area. Am J Roentgenol 2007; 189: 197-203
7. Habis M, Daoud B, Roger VL et al. Comparison of 64-slice computed tomography planimetry and Doppler echocardiography in the assessment of aortic valve stenosis. J Heart Valve Dis 2007; 16: 216-224
8. Koos R, Mahnken AH, Sinha AM et al. Aortic valve calcification as a marker for aortic stenosis severity: assessment on 16-MDCT. Am J Roentgenol 2004; 183: 1813-1818
9. Mahnken AH, Koos R, Wildberger JE et al. Wertigkeit der kardialen Mehrschicht-Spiral-CT zur Beurteilung der degenerativen Aortenklappenstenose: Vergleich zur Echokardiographie. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 1582-1588
10. Morgan-Hughes GJ, Owens PE, Roobottom CA et al. Three dimensional volume quantification of aortic valve calcification using multislice computed tomography. Heart 2003; 89: 1191-1194
11. Rosenhek R, Binder T, Porenta G et al. Predictors of outcome in severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 611-617
12. Perisinakis K, Damitakis J, Tzedakis A et al. Determination of the weighted CT dose index in modern multi-detector CT scanners. Phys Med Biol 2007; 52: 6485-6495
13. Burwash IG, Dickinson A, Teskey RJ et al. Aortic valve area discrepancy by Gorlin equation and Doppler echocardiography continuity equation: relationship to flow in patients with valvular aortic stenosis. Can J Cardiol 2007; 16: 985-992
14. Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Blumenthal RS et al. Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation 2006; 114: 1761-1791
15. Saam T, Kerwin WS, Chu B et al. Sample size calculation for clinical trials using magnetic resonance imaging for the quantitative assessment of carotid atherosclerosis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2005; 7: 799-808
16. Caruthers SD, Lin SJ, Brown P et al. Practical Value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for clinical quantification of aortic valve stenosis: comparison with echocardiography. Circulation 2003; 108: 2236-2243
17. Pouleur AC, le Polain de Waroux JB, Pasquet A et al. Aortic Valve Area Assessment: Multidetector CT Compared with Cine MR Imaging and Transthoracic and Transesophageal Echocardiography. Radiology 2007; 244: 745-754
18. Ruhl KM, Langebartels G, Autschbach R et al. Kernspintomografie zur umfassenden Untersuchung des Herzens nach Implantation von linksventrikulären apikoaortalen Conduits. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2007; 179: 566-571
19. Koos R, Kuhl HP, Muhlenbruch G et al. Prevalence and clinical importance of aortic valve calcification detected incidentally on CT scans: comparison with echocardiography. Radiology 2006; 241: 76-82
20. Jakobs TF, Becker CR, Ohnesorge B et al. Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation. Eur Radiol 2002; 12: 1081-1086
21. Muhlenbruch G, Wildberger JE, Koos R et al. Calcium scoring of aortic valve calcification in aortic valve stenosis with a multislice computed tomography scanner: non-enhanced versus contrast-enhanced studies. Acta Radiol 2005; 46: 561-566
22. Hong C, Becker CR, Schoepf UJ et al. Coronary artery calcium: absolute quantification in nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT studies. Radiology 2002; 223: 474-480