Is it wraparound yet? Setting quality standards for implementation of the wraparound process

Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 240-252

  Bruns, Eric J ^a   Suter, Jesse C ^b   Leverentz Brady, Kristen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

Author keywords

Children; Fidelity; Implementation; Standards; Wraparound; Youth

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH SERVICE; INTERVIEW; QUALITY CONTROL;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT HEALTH SERVICES; ADULT; AFFECTIVE SYMPTOMS; BENCHMARKING; CHILD; CHILD BEHAVIOR DISORDERS; CHILD HEALTH SERVICES; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR DISORDERS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 47149116017     PISSN: 10943412     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11414-008-9109-3     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Salyers MP, Bond GR, Teague GB, et al. Is it ACT yet? Real-world examples of evaluating the degree of implementation for assertive community treatment. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 2003;13:304-320.
2. Bruns EJ, Burchard JD, Suter JC, et al. Assessing fidelity to a community-based treatment for youth: the Wraparound Fidelity Index. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders. 2004;12:79-89.
3. Test MA, Stein LI. Community treatment of the chronic patient: Research overview. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 1980;4:350-364.
4. Burchard JD, Bruns EJ, Burchard SN. The wraparound process. In: Burns B, Hoagwood K, English M, eds. Community-Based Interventions for Youth. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2002:69-90.
5. Farmer EMZ, Dorsey S, Mustillo SA. Intensive home and community interventions. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America. 2004;13:857-884.
6. Carney MM, Buttell F. Reducing juvenile recidivism: evaluating the wraparound services model. Research on Social Work Practice. 2004;13:551-568.
7. Pullman MD, Kerbs J, Koroloff N, et al. Juvenile offenders with mental health needs: reducing recidivism using wraparound. Crime and Delinquency. 2006;52:375-397.
8. Kamradt B. Wraparound Milwaukee: aiding youth with mental health needs. Juvenile Justice. 2000;7:14-23.
9. Anderson JA, Wright ER, Kooreman HE, et al. The Dawn project: a model for responding to the needs of young people with emotional and behavioral disabilities and their families. Community Mental Health Journal. 2003;39:63-74.
10. Bruns EJ, Rast J, Walker JW, et al. Applying evaluation data and the wraparound process to achieve systems change for children and families. American Journal of Community Psychology. 2006;38:201-212.
11. Faw L. The state wraparound survey. In: Burns BJ, Goldman SK, eds. Systems of Care: Promising Practices in Children's Mental Health, 1998 series. Vol. IV: Promising Practices in Wraparound for Children with Severe Emotional Disorders and Their Families. Washington, DC: Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice, American Institutes for Research; 1999:27-32.
12. Weisz JR, Sandler IN, Durlak JA, et al. A proposal to unite two different worlds of children's mental health. American Psychologist. 2006;61:644-645.
13. US Public Health Service. Mental Health. A Report of the Surgeon General. US Department of Health and Human Services Administration, Center for Mental Health Services. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health; 1999.
14. US Public Health Service. Youth Violence: A report of the Surgeon General. US Department of Health and Human Services Administration, Center for Mental Health Services. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health; 2001.
15. US Department of Health and Human Services. Cooperative Agreements for the Comprehensive Community Mental Health Services for Children and Their Families Program (SM-05-010); 2005. Available at http://www.systemsofcare. samhsa.gov. Accessed September 2, 2005.
16. Friedman R, Drews D. Evidence based practices, systems of care, and individualized care. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, Department of Child and Family Studies. The Research and Training Center for children's Mental Health; 2005.
17. Tolan P, Dodge K. Children's mental health as a primary care and concern: a system for comprehensive support and services. American Psychologist. 2005;60:601-614.
18. Bruns EJ, Suter JC, Leverentz-Brady KM. Relations between program and system variables and fidelity to the wraparound process for children and families. Psychiatric Services. 2006;57:1586-1593.
19. Bruns EJ, Burchard JD, Suter JC, et al. Adherence to wraparound principles and association with outcomes. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 2005;14:521-534.
20. Ferguson C. California's title IV-E child welfare waiver demonstration project evaluation: an analysis of wraparound in Alameda County. In: Newman C, Liberton C, Kutash K, et al, eds. The 17th Annual Research Conference Proceedings: A System of Care for Children's Mental Health. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Florida Mental Health Institute Research and training Center for Children's Mental Health; 2004:149-153.
21. Hagen M, Noble K, Schick C, et al. The relationship between fidelity to wraparound and positive behavior outcomes. In: Newman C, Liberton CJ, Kutash K, et al, eds. The 16th Annual Research Conference Proceedings, A System of Care for Children's Mental Health: Expanding the Research Base. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, The Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, Research and Training Center for Children's Mental Health; 2003:293-296.
22. Suter JC, Burchard JD, Bruns EJ, et al. User's Manual to the Wraparound Fidelity Index 3.0. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Department of Psychology; 2005.
23. Sather A, Bruns EJ, Stambaugh LF, et al. The state wraparound survey. Presented at the Building on Family Strengths Conference. Portland, OR: Research and Services in Support of Children and their Families; 2007.
24. Peterson CR, Gruner L, Earnest L, et al. Comparing functional outcomes of wraparound and traditional mental health and child welfare services. In: Newman C, Liberton CJ, Kutash K, et al, eds. The 16th Annual Research Conference Proceedings, A System of Care for Children's Mental Health: Expanding the Research Base. Tampa: FL: University of South Florida, The Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, Research and Training Center for Children's Mental Health; 2004:307-311.
25. Bruns EJ, Suter JD, Leverentz-Brady K. A national portrait of wraparound implementation. In: Newman C, Liberton C, Kutash K, et al, eds. The 16th Annual Research Conference Proceedings: A System of Care for Children's Mental Health. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Florida Mental Health Institute Research and training Center for Children's Mental Health; 2004:281-286.
26. Hodges K. Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale. Ypsilanti, MI: Eastern Michigan University, Department of Psychology; 1997.
27. Rast J, Peterson CR, Earnest L, et al. Service process as a determinant of treatment effect-the importance of fidelity. In: Newman C, Liberton CJ, Kutash K, et al, eds. The 16th Annual Research Conference Proceedings, a System of Care for Children's Mental Health: Expanding the Research Base. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, The Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, Research and Training Center for Children's Mental Health; 2004:311-315.
28. Rast J, VanDenBerg J. Certification of facilitators as a method for increasing wraparound fidelity. In: Newman C, Liberton CJ, Kutash K, et al, eds. The 16th Annual Research Conference Proceedings, a System of Care for Children's Mental Health: Expanding the Research Base. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, The Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, Research and Training Center for Children's Mental Health; 2004:315-320.
29. Walker JS, Bruns EJ. The wraparound process: Individualized care planning and management for children and families. In: Rosenberg S, Rosenberg J, eds. Community Mental Health Reader: Current Perspectives. New York: Routledge; 2006:44-54.
30. Walker JS, Bruns EJ. Surveying experts to define the wraparound process for children and families: An example of practice-based evidence. Psychiatric Services. 2006;57:1579-1585.
31. Stambaugh LF, Mustillo SA, Burns BJ, et al. Outcomes from wraparound and multisystemic therapy in a Center for Mental Health Services system-of-care demonstration site. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders. 2007;17:143-155.
32. Henggeler SW, Schoenwald S, Rowland MD, et al. Serious Emotional Disturbance In Children and Adolescents: Multisystemic Therapy. New York: Guilford; 2002.
33. Achenbach TM. Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4-18 & 1991 Profile. Burlington: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry; 1991.
34. Stroul B, Friedman R. The system of care concept and philosophy. In: Stroul B, ed. Children's Mental Health: Creating Systems of Care in a Changing Society. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes; 1996.
35. Fixen DL, Naoom SF, Blasé KA, et al. Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. FMHI pub. no. #231. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network; 2005.
36. Rosenheck RA. Organizational process: A missing link between research and practice. Psychiatric Services. 2001;52:1607-1612.