Commentary to Note by Seth: Experiments show what post-decision wagering measures

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 984-985

  Persaud, Navindra ^a   McLeod, Peter ^a   Cowey, Alan ^a  

^a Department of Experimental Psychology ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AWARENESS; CONSCIOUSNESS; DECISION MAKING; GRAMMAR; HUMAN; PATHOLOGICAL GAMBLING; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; WAGERING;

EID: 47149113355     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: 10902376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.06.002     Document Type: Note

References (6)

1. Cowey A. The 30th Sir Frederick Bartlett lecture fact, artefact, and myth about blindsight. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 57 (2004) 577-609
2. Crick, F. (1994). The Astonishing Hypothesis: The Scientific Search For The Soul Scribner reprint edition.
3. Dienes Z., and Scott R. Measuring unconscious knowledge: Distinguishing structural knowledge and judgment knowledge. Psychological Research 69 (2005) 338-351
4. Persaud N., McLeod P., and Cowey A. Post-decision wagering objectively measures awareness. Nature Neuroscience 10 (2007) 257-261
5. Seth A.K. Post-decision wagering measures metacognitive content, not sensory consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition 17 3 (2008) 981-983 10.1016/j.concog.2007.05.008
6. Seth A.K., Baars B.J., and Edelman D.B. Criteria for consciousness in humans and other mammals. Consciousness and Cognition 14 (2005) 119-139