Can auditory and visual speech perception be trained within a group setting?

American Journal of Audiology

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 80-97

  Preminger, Jill E ^a   Ziegler, Craig H ^b  

^a University of Louisville School of Medicine   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

Audiologic rehabilitation; Auditory only speech perception; Auditory visual speech perception; Hearing loss; Training

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY ONLY SPEECH PERCEPTION TRAINING; AUDITORY REHABILITATION; AUDITORY VISUAL SPEECH PERCEPTION TRAINING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMOTION; EVALUATION; FEMALE; GROUP THERAPY; HEARING; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERCEPTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RATING SCALE; SOCIALIZATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TRAINING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISION;

AGED; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TEACHING; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 47149110242     PISSN: 10590889     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1059-0889(2008/009)     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Abrams, H. B., Chisolm, T. H., & McArdle, R. (2002). A cost-utility analysis of adult group audiologic rehabilitation: Are the benefits worth the cost? Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 39, 549-558.
2. Abrams, H. B., Hnath-Chisolm, T., Guerreiro, S. M., & Ritterman, S. I. (1992). The effects of intervention strategy on self-perception of hearing handicap. Ear and Hearing, 13, 371-377.
3. Bernstein, L. E., Auer, E. T., & Tucker, P. E. (2001). Enhanced speechreading in deaf adults: Can short-term training/practice close the gap for hearing adults? Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 44, 5-18.
4. Beynon, G. J., Thornton, F. L., & Poole, C. (1997). A randomized, controlled trial of the efficacy of a communication course for first time hearing aid users. British Journal of Audiology, 31, 345-351.
5. Binnie, C. A. (1977). Attitude changes following speechreading training. Scandinavian Audiology, 6, 13-19.
6. Boothroyd, A. (1984). Auditory perception of speech contrasts by subjects with sensorineural hearing loss. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27, 134-144.
7. Boothroyd, A., Hnath-Chisolm, T., Hanin, L., & Kishon-Rabin, L. (1988). Voice fundamental frequency as an auditory supplement to the speechreading of sentences. Ear and Hearing, 9, 306-312.
8. Brewer, D. M. (2001). Considerations in measuring effectiveness of group audiologic rehabilitation classes. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology, 34, 53-60.
9. Burk, M. H., Humes, L. E., Amos, N. E., & Strauser, L. E. (2006). Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners. Ear and Hearing, 27, 263-278.
10. Chi, G. (2002, June). Active control non-superiority trial - what it is about. Paper presented at the 2002 ICSA Applied Statistics Symposium, Plymouth Meeting, PA. Retrieved February 21, 2008, from www.fda.gov/cder/offices/Biostatistics/chi_5/index.htm.
11. Chisolm, T. H., Abrams, H. B., & McArdle, R. (2004). Shotland long-term outcomes of adult audiological rehabilitation. Ear and Hearing, 25, 464-477.
12. Chisolm, T. H., Abrams, H. B., McArdle, R., Wilson, R. H., & Doyle, P. J. (2005). The WHO-DAS II: Psychometric properties in the measurement of functional health status in adults with acquired hearing loss. Trends in Amplification, 9, 111-126.
13. Erber, N. P. (1971). Effects of distance on the visual reception of speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 848-857.
14. Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). "Minimental state": A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189-198.
15. Friedman, L. M., Furberg, C. D., & Demets, D. D. (1998). Fundamentals of clinical trials (3rd ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag.
16. Gagné, J. P., Dinon, D., & Parsons, J. (1991). An evaluation of CAST: A computer-aided speechreading training program. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 213-221.
17. Grant, K. W., & Settz, P. F. (1998). Measures of auditory-visual integration in nonsense syllables and sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104, 2438-2450.
18. Grant, K. W., Walden, B. E., & Seitz, P. F. (1998). Auditoryvisual speech recognition by hearing-impaired subjects: Consonant recognition, sentence recognition, and auditory-visual integration. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103, 2677-2690.
19. Hardick, E. J., Oyer, H. J., & Irion, P. E. (1970). Lipreading performance as related to measurements of vision. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 13, 92-100.
20. Hawkins, D. B. (2005). Effectiveness of counseling-based adult group aural rehabilitation programs: A systematic review of the evidence. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 16, 485-493.
21. Hogan, A. (2001). Hearing rehabilitation for deafened adults: A psychosocial approach. London: Whurr.
22. Howell, I., & Montgomery, A. A. (1997). Auditory-visual integration: A practical approach. Seminars in Hearing, 18, 141-151.
23. Kander, M., & White, S. (2006, March 21). Coding auditory and aural rehabilitation procedures. The ASHA Leader, 11(4), pp. 3, 16-17.
24. Kaplan, H., Bally, S., & Garretson, C. (1985). Speechreading: A way to improve understanding. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
25. Kricos, P. B., & Holmes, A. E. (1996). Efficacy of audiologic rehabilitation for older adults. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 7, 219-229.
26. Kricos, P. B., Holmes, A. E., & Doyle, D. A. (1992). Efficacy of a communication training program for hearing-impaired elderly adults. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology, 25, 69-80.
27. Levitt, H. (1971). Transformed up-down methods in psycho-acoustics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49(Suppl. 2), 467.
28. Lively, S. E., Pisoni, D. B., Yamada, R. A., Tohkura, Y., & Yamada, T. (1994). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /1/. III. Long-term retention of new phonetic categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96, 2076-2087.
29. Logan, J. S., Lively, S. E., & Pisoni, D. B. (1993). Training listeners to perceive novel phonetic categories: How do we know what is learned? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94, 1148-1151.
30. Massaro, D. W., Cohen, M. M., & Gesi, A. T. (1993). Longterm training, transfer, and retention in learning to lipread. Perception and Psychophysics, 53, 549-562.
31. McArdle, R., Chisolm, T. H., Abrams, H. B., Wilson, R. H., & Doyle, P. J. (2005). The WHO-DAS II: Measuring outcomes of hearing aid intervention for adults. Trends in Amplification, 9, 127-143.
32. Merzenich, M. M., Jenkins, W. M., Johnston, P., Schreiner, C., Miller, S. L., & Tallal, P. (1996). Temporal processing deficits of language-learning impaired children ameliorated by training. Science, 271, 77-81.
33. Miller, J. D., Watson, C. S., Kistler, D. J., Wightman, F. L., & Preminger, J. E. (2007). Preliminary evaluation of the speech perception assessment and training system (SPATS) with hearingaid and cochlear-implant users [Abstract]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122, 3063.
34. Montgomery, A. A., Walden, B. E., Schwartz, D. M., & Prosek, R. A. (1984). Training auditory-visual speech reception in adults with moderate sensorineural hearing loss. Ear and Hearing, 5, 30-36.
35. Newman, C. W., Weinstein, B. E., Jacobson, G. P., & Hug, G. A. (1990). The Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults: Psychometric adequacy and audiometric correlates. Ear and Hearing, 11, 430-433.
36. Newman, C. W., Weinstein, B. E., Jacobson, G. P., & Hug, G. A. (1991). Test-retest reliability of the hearing handicap inventory for adults. Ear and Hearing, 12, 355-357.
37. Nogaki, G., Fu, Q. J., & Galvin, J. J., III. (2007). Effect of training rate on recognition of spectrally shifted speech. Ear and Hearing, 28, 132-140.
38. Norman, M., George, C. R., Downie, A., & Milligan, J. (1995). Evaluation of a communication course for new hearing aid users. Scandinavian Audiology, 24, 63-69.
39. Piantadosi, S. (1997). Clinical trials: A methodologic perspective. New York: Wiley.
40. Preminger, J. E. (2003). Should significant others be encouraged to join adult group audiologic rehabilitation classes? Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 14, 545-555.
41. Rubinstein, A., & Boothroyd, A. (1987). Effect of two approaches to auditory training on speech recognition by hearing-impaired adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 30, 153-160.
42. Schuirmann, D. J. (1987). A comparison of the two one-sided test procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. Journal of Phamacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 15, 657-680.
43. Scott, L. C., Metz, D. E., Rohland, P., & Samar, V. J. (1989). A cognitive/experiential approach to aural rehabilitation. American Annals of the Deaf, 134, 27-29.
44. Smaldino, S. E., & Smaldino, J. J. (1988). The influence of aural rehabilitation and cognitive style disclosure of the perception of hearing handicap. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology, 21, 49-56.
45. Sommers, M. S., Tye-Murray, N., & Spehar, B. (2005). Auditory-visual speech perception and auditory-visual enhancement in normal-hearing younger and older adults. Ear and Hearing, 26, 263-275.
46. Stach, B. A., Spretnjak, M. L., & Jerger, J. (1990). The prevalence of central presbyacusis in a clinical population. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 1, 109-115.
47. Stacker, G. C., Bowman, G. A., Yund, W., Herron, T. J., Roup, C. M., & Woods, D. L. (2006). Perceptual training improves syllable identification in new and experienced hearing aid users. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 43, 537-552.
48. Sweetow, R., & Palmer, C. V. (2005). Efficacy of individual auditory training in adults: A systematic review of the evidence. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 16, 494-504.
49. Sweetow, R. W., & Sabes, J. H. (2006). The need for and development of an adaptive Listening and Communication Enhancement (LACE) Program. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 17, 538-558.
50. Thornton, A. R., & Raffin, M. J. (1978). Speech-discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 21, 507-518.
51. Tremblay, K., Kraus, N., Carrell, T. D., & McGee, T. (1997). Central auditory system plasticity: Generalization to novel stimuli following listening training. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 3762-3773.
52. Tye-Murray, N. (1997). Communication training for older teenagers and adults. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
53. Ventry, I. M., & Weinstein, B. E. (1982). The hearing handicap inventory for the elderly: A new tool. Ear and Hearing, 3, 128-134.
54. Walden, B. E., Erdman, S. A., Montgomery, A. A., Schwartz, D. M., & Prosek, R. A. (1981). Some effects of training on speech recognition by hearing-impaired adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 24, 207-216.
55. Walden, B. E., Prosek, R. A., Montgomery, A. A., Scherr, C. K., & Jones, C. J. (1977). Effects of training on the visual recognition of consonants. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 20, 130-145.
56. Watson, C. S. (1980). Time course of auditory perceptual learning. The Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology Supplement, 89, 96-102.
57. Weinstein, B. E., Spitzer, J. B., & Ventry, I. M. (1986). Testretest reliability of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly. Ear and Hearing, 7, 295-299.
58. Wothke, W. (1998). Longitudinal and multi-group modeling with missing data. In T. D. Little, K. U. Schnabel, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multiple group data: Practical issues, applied approaches and specific examples (pp. 219-240). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
59. Yellin, M. W., Jerger, J., & Fifer, R. C. (1989). Norms for disproportionate loss in speech intelligibility. Ear and Hearing, 10, 231-234.