What does the future hold for the NHS at 60?

BMJ

Volumn 337, Issue 7660, 2008, Pages 1-2

  Klein, Rudolf ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; CONFLICT; CONSENSUS; EDITORIAL; HEALTH CARE POLICY; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED KINGDOM; FORECASTING;

FORECASTING; GREAT BRITAIN; STATE MEDICINE;

EID: 47149086390     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.a549     Document Type: Editorial

References (7)

1. Department of Health. NHS still the envy of the world. Press release. London: DOH, 22 Oct 1998.
2. Delamothe T. NHS at 60: founding principles. BMJ 2008;336:1216-8.
3. Klein R. Values talk in the (English) NHS. In: Greer SL, Rowland D, eds. Devolving policy, diverging values? London: Nuffield Trust, 2007:19-28.
4. Gubb J. Should patients be able to pay top-up fees to receive the treatment they want? Yes. BMJ 2008;336:1104.
5. Bloor K. Should patients be able to pay top-up fees to receive the treatment they want? No. BMJ 2008;336:1105.
6. Ham C. Clinically integrated systems: the next step in English health reform? Briefing paper. London: Nuffield Trust, 2007.
7. Greer SL, Jarman H. The Department of Health and the Civil Service. London: Nuffield Trust, 2007.