Bird song structure and transmission in the neotropics: Trends, Methods and future directions

Ornitologia Neotropical

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 175-199

  Barker, Nicole K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR   (Canada)

Author keywords

Acoustic adaptation hypothesis; Animal communication; Attenuation; Bird song; Degradation; Habitat; Sound transmission; Tropics; Vegetation

Indexed keywords

EID: 47049125992     PISSN: 10754377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (112)

1. Anderson, M. E., & R. N. Conner. 1985. Northern Cardinal song in three forest habitats in eastern Texas. Wilson Bull. 97: 436-449.
2. Aubin, T., N. Mathevon, M. L. da Silva, J. M. E. Vielliard, & F. Sebe. 2004. How a simple and stereotyped acoustic signal transmits individual information: the song of the White-browed Warbler Basileuterus leucoblepharus. An. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 76: 335-344.
3. Badyaev, A. V., & E. S. Leaf. 1997. Habitat associations of song characteristics in Phylloscopus and Hippolais warblers. Auk 114: 40-46.
4. Baker, M. C., & J. T. Boylan. 1999. Singing behavior, mating associations and reproductive success in a population of hybridizing Lazuli and Indigo Buntings. Condor 101: 493-504.
5. Ballentine, B. 2006. Morphological adaptation influences the evolution of a mating signal. Evolution 60: 1936-1944.
6. Ballentine, B., J. Hyman, S. Nowicki. 2004. Vocal performance influences female response to male bird song: an experimental test. Behav. Ecol. 15: 163-168.
7. Balsby, T. J. S., T. Dabelsteen, & S. B. Pedersen. 2003. Degradation of Whitethroat vocalizations: implications for song flight and communication network activities. Behaviour 140: 695-719.
8. Bertelli, S., & P. L. Tubaro. 2002. Body mass and habitat correlates of song structure in a primitive group of birds. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 77: 423-430.
9. Blumstein, D. T., & A. C. Turner. 2005. Can the acoustic adaptation hypothesis predict the structure of Australian birdsong? Acta. Ethol. 8: 35-44.
10. Boncoraglio, G., & N. Saino. 2007. Habitat structure and the evolution of bird song: A meta-analysis of the evidence for the acoustic adaptation hypothesis. Funct. Ecol. 21: 134-142.
11. Bosch, J., & I. de la Riva. 2004. Are frog calls modulated by the environment? An analysis with anuran species from Bolivia. Can. J. Zool. 82: 880-888.
12. Bowman, R. I. 1979. Adaptive morphology of song dialects in Darwin's finches. J. Ornithol. 120: 353-389.
13. Bradbury, J. W., & S. L. Vehrencamp. 1998. Principles of animal communication. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
14. Brémond, J-C., & T. Aubin. 1990. Responses to distress calls by black-headed gulls, Larus ridibundus: the role of non-degraded features. Anim. Behav. 39: 503-511.
15. Brenowitz, E. A. 1982. The active space of Red-winged Blackbird song. J. Comp. Physiol. 147: 511-522.
16. Brown, C. H., R. Gomez, & P. M. Waser. 1995. Old world monkey vocalizations: Adaptation to the local habitat? Anim. Behav. 50: 945-961.
17. Brown, T. J., & P. Handford. 1996. Acoustic signals amplitude patterns: a computer simulation investigation of the acoustic adaptation hypothesis. Condor 98: 608-623.
18. Brown, T. J., & P. Handford. 2000. Sound design for vocalizations: quality in the woods, consistency in the fields. Condor 102: 81-92.
19. Brown, T. J., & P. Handford. 2003. Why birds sing at dawn: the role of consistent song transmission. Ibis 145: 120-129.
20. Budney, G. F., & R. W. Grotke. 1997. Techniques for audio recording vocalizations of tropical birds. Ornithol. Monogr. 48: 147-163.
21. Calder, W. A. 1990. The scaling of sound output and territory size: Are they matched? Ecology 71: 1810-1816.
22. Catchpole, C. K., & P. J. B. Slater. 1995. Bird song: biological themes and variations. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK.
23. Chappuis, C. 1971. Un exemple de l'influence du milieu sur les émissions vocales des oiseaux: l'évolution des chants en forêt équatoriale. Terre Vie 118: 183-202.
24. Cosens, S. E., & J. B. Falls. 1984. A comparison of sound propagation and song frequency in temporal marsh and grassland habitats. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 15: 161-170.
25. Dabelsteen, T., O. N. Larsen, & S. B. Pedersen. 1993. Habitat- induced degradation of sounds signals: quantifying the effects of communication sounds and bird location on blur ratio, excess attenuation, and signal-to-noise ratio in Blackbird song. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93: 2206-2220.
26. Date, E. M., & R. E. Lemon. 1993. Sound transmission: a basis for dialects in birdsong? Behaviour 124: 291-312.
27. Doutrelant, C., & M. M. Lambrechts. 2001. Macro-geographic variation in song - a test of competition and habitat effects in Blue Tits. Ethology 107: 533-544.
28. Doutrelant, C., A. Leitao, M. Giorgi, & M. M. Lambrechts. 1999. Geographical variation in Blue Tit song, the result of an adjustment to vegetation type? Behaviour 136: 481-493.
29. Ellinger, N., & W. Hödl. 2003. Habitat acoustics of a Neotropical lowland rainforest. Bioacoustics 13: 297-321.
30. Fotheringham, J. R., P. R. Martin, & L. Ratcliffe. 1997. Song transmission and auditory perception of distance in wood warblers (Parulinae). Anim. Behav. 53: 1271-1285.
31. Gibbs, H. L., & P. R. Grant. 1987. Oscillating selection in Darwin's finches. Nature 327: 511-513.
32. Gish, S. L., & E. S. Morton. 1981. Structural adaptations to local habitat acoustics in Carolina Wren song. Z. Tierpsychol. 56: 74-84.
33. Handford, P., & S. C. Lougheed. 1991. Variation in duration and frequency characters in the song of the Rufous-collared Sparrow, Zonotrichia capensis, with respect to habitat, trill dialects and body size. Condor 93: 644-658.
34. Hansen, I. J., K. A. Otter, H. van Oort, & C. I. Holschuh. 2005. Acta Etholog. 8: 111-120.
35. Hansen, P. 1979. Vocal learning: its role in adapting sound structures to long-distance propagation and a hypothesis on its evolution. Anim. Behav. 27: 1270-1271.
36. Holland, J., T. Dabelsteen, & S. B. Pedersen. 1998. Degradation of wren Troglodytes troglodytes song: implications for information transfer and ranging. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103: 2154-2166.
37. Holland, J., T. Dabelsteen, & A. L. Paris. 2000. Coding in the song of the wren: importance of rhythmicity, syntax and element structure. Anim. Behav. 60: 463-470.
38. Hunter, M. L. Jr., & J. R. Krebs. 1979. Geographical variation in the song of the Great Tit (Parus major) in relation to ecological factors. J. Anim. Ecol. 48: 759-785.
39. Hylton, R., & R. D. Godard. 2001. Song properties of Indigo Buntings in open and forested habitats. Wilson Bull. 113: 243-245.
40. Irwin, D. E. 2000. Song variation in an avian ring species. Evolution 54: 998-1010.
41. King, A. P., M. J. West, D. H. Eastzer, & J. E. R. Staddon. 1981. An Experimental investigation of the bioacoustics of Cowbird song. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 9: 211-217.
42. Konishi, M. 1970. Evolution of design features in the coding of species-specificity. Am. Zool. 10: 67-72.
43. Kopuchian, C., D. A. Lijtmaer, P. L. Tubaro, & P. Handford. 2004. Temporal stability and change in a microgeographical pattern of song variation in the Rufous-collared Sparrow. Anim. Behav. 68: 551-559.
44. Kroon, F. J., & D. A. Westcott. 2006. Song variation and habitat structure in the Golden Bowerbird. Emu 106: 263-272.
45. Laiolo, P., & A. Rolando. 2003. The evolution of vocalisations in the genus Corvus: effects of phylogeny, morphology and habitat. Evol. Ecol. 17: 111-123.
46. Leader, N.J. Wright, & Y. Yom-Tov. 2005. Acoustic properties of two urban song dialects in the Orange-tufted Sunbird (Nertarinia osea). Auk 122: 231-245.
47. Lemon, R. E., J. Struger, M. J. Lechowicz, R. F. Norman. 1981. Song features and singing heights of American warblers: maximization or optimization of distance? J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 69: 1169-1176.
48. Lengagne, T., & P. J. B. Slater. 2002. The effects of rain on acoustic communication: tawny owls have good reason for calling less in wet weather. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 269: 2121-2125.
49. Lijtmaer, D. A., & P. L. Tubaro. 2007. A reversed pattern of association between song dialects and habitat in the Rufous-collared Sparrow. Condor. 109: 658-667.
50. Marten, K., & P. Marler. 1977. Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization, I. Temperate habitats. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2: 271-290.
51. Marten, K., D. Quine, & P. Marler. 1977. Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization, II. Tropical forest habitats. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2: 291-302.
52. Martens, M. J. M. 1980. Foliage as a low-pass filter: experiments with model forests in an anechoic chamber. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67: 66-72.
53. Mathevon, N., & Aubin, T. 2001. Sound-based species-specific recognition in the Blackcap Sylvia atricapilla shows high tolerance to signal modifications. Behaviour 138: 511-524.
54. Mathevon, N., T. Aubin, & T. Dabelsteen. 1996. Song degradation during propagation: importance of song post for the wren Troglodytes troglodytes. Ethology 102: 397-412.
55. Mathevon, N., T. Dabelsteen, & S. H. Blumenrath. 2005. Are high perches in the Blackcap Sylvia atricapilla song or listening posts? A sound transmission study. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117: 442-449.
56. McGregor, P. K., & J. R. Krebs. 1984. Sound degradation as a distance cue in Great Tit (Parus major) song. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 16: 49-56.
57. Morton, E. S. 1975. Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. Am. Nat. 109: 17-34.
58. Morton, E. S. 1982. Grading, discreteness, redundancy, and motivation-structural rules. Pp. 183-212 in Kroodsma, D. E., E. H. Miller, & H. Quellet (eds.). Acoustic communication in birds. Volume I. Academic Press, New York, New York.
59. Morton, E. S. 1986. Predictions from the ranging hypothesis for the evolution of long distance signals in birds. Behaviour 99: 65-86.
60. Morton, E. S. 1996. A comparison of vocal behavior among tropical and temperate passerine birds. Pp. 258-268 in Kroodsma, D. E., & E. H. Miller (eds.). Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, New York.
61. Morton, E. S. 1998. Degradation and signal ranging in birds: memory matters. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 42: 135-137.
62. Naguib, M. 1995. Auditory distance assessment of singing conspecifics in Carolina Wrens: the role of reverberation and frequency-dependent attenuation. Anim. Behav. 50: 1297-1307.
63. Naguib, M. 1996. Auditory distance estimation in song birds: Implications, methodologies and perspectives. Behav. Process. 38: 163-168.
64. Naguib, M. 1997. Ranging of songs in Carolina Wrens: effects of familiarity with the song type on use of different cues. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 40: 385-393.
65. Naguib, M. 2003. Reverberation of rapid and slow trills: implications for signal adaptations to long-range communication. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113: 1749-1756.
66. Naguib, M., K. Hammerschmidt, & J. Wirth. 2001. Microgeographic variation, habitat effects and individual signature cues in calls of Chiffchaffs Phylloscopus collybita canarensisi. Ethology 107: 341-355.
67. Nelson, B. S. 2003. Reliability of sound attenuation in Florida scrub habitat and behavioral implications. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113: 2901-2911.
68. Nemeth, E., H. Winkler, & T. Dabelsteen. 2001. Differential degradation of antbird songs in a Neotropical rainforest: Adaptation to perch height? J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110: 3263-3274.
69. Nemeth, E., T. Dabelsteen, S. B. Pedersen, & H. Winkler. 2006. Rainforests as concert halls for birds: Are reverberations improving sound transmission of long song elements? J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119: 620-626.
70. Nicholls, J. A., & A. W. Goldizen. 2006. Habitat type and density influence vocal signal design in satin bowerbirds. J. Anim. Ecol. 75: 549-558.
71. Nottebohm, F. 1985. Sound transmission, signal salience, and song dialects. Behav. Brain Sci. 8: 112-113.
72. Padgham, M. 2004. Reverberation and frequency attenuation in forests - implications for acoustic communication in animals. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115: 402-410.
73. Pedersen, S. B. 1998. SIGPRO. Centre for Sound Communication, University of Southern Denmark.
74. Podos, J. 2001. Correlated evolution of morphology and vocal signal structure in Darwin's finches. Nature 409: 185-188.
75. Rheindt, F. E., T. U. Grafe, & E. Abouheif. 2004. Rapidly evolving traits and the comparative method: how important is testing for phylogenetic signal? Evol. Ecol. Res. 6: 377-396.
76. Richards, D. G. 1981. Estimation of distance of singing conspecifics by the Carolina Wren. Auk 98: 127-133.
77. Richards, P. W. 1952. The tropical rain forest. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK.
78. Richards, D. G., & R. H. Wiley. 1980. Reverberations and amplitude fluctuations in the propagation of sound in a forest: implications for animal communication. Am. Nat. 115: 381-399.
79. Rothstein, S. I., & R.C. Fleischer. 1987. Vocal dialects and their possible relation to honest status signaling in the Brown-headed Cowbird. Condor 89: 1-23.
80. Ruegg, K., H. Slabbekoorn, S. Clegg, & T. B. Smith. 2006. Divergence in mating signals correlates with ecological variation in the migratory songbird, Swainson's Thrush (Catharus ustulatus). Mol. Ecol. 15: 3147-3156.
81. Ryan, M. J., & E. A. Brenowitz. 1985. The role of body size, phylogeny, and ambient noise in the evolution of bird song. Am. Nat. 126: 87-100.
82. Saunders, J., & R. Slotow. 2004. The evolution of song structure in southern African birds: an assessment of the acoustic adaptation hypothesis. Ostrich 74: 147-155.
83. Seddon, N. 2005. Ecological adaptation and species recognition drives vocal evolution in Neotropical suboscine birds. Evolution 59: 200-215.
84. Shy, E. 1983. The relation of geographical variation in song to habitat characteristics and body size in North American tanagers (Thraupinae: Piranga). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 12: 71-76.
85. Slabbekoorn, H. 2004a. Habitat-dependent ambient noise: consistent spectral profiles in two African forest types. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116: 3727-3733.
86. Slabbekoorn, H. 2004b. Singing in the wild: the ecology of birdsong. Pp. 178-205 in Marler, P., & H. Slabbekoorn (eds.). Nature's music: the science of birdsong. Elsevier Academic Press, New York, New York.
87. Slabbekoorn, H., & A. den Boer-Visser. 2006. Cities change the songs of birds. Curr. Biol. 16: 2326-2331.
88. Slabbekoorn, H., & M. Peet. 2003. Birds sing at a higher pitch in urban noise. Nature 424: 267.
89. Slabbekoorn, H., & T. B. Smith. 2002a. Bird song, ecology and speciation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 357: 493-503.
90. Slabbekoorn, H., & T. B. Smith. 2002b. Habitat-dependent song divergence in the Little Greenbul: an analysis of environmental selection pressures on acoustic signals. Evolution 56: 1849-1858.
91. Slabbekoorn, H., J. Ellers, & T. B. Smith. 2002. Birdsong and sound transmission: the benefits of reverberations. Condor 104: 564-573.
92. Slabbekoorn, H., P. Yeh, & K. Hunt. 2007. Sound transmission and song divergence: A comparison of urban and forest acoustics. Condor 109: 67-78.
93. Smith J. I., & H-T. Yu. 1992. The association between vocal characteristics and habitat type in Taiwanese passerines. Zool. Sci. 9: 659-664.
94. Sorjonen, J. 1986a. Factors affecting the structure of song and the singing behaviour of some northern European passerine birds. Behaviour 98: 286-304.
95. Sorjonen, J. 1986b. Song structure and singing strategies in the genus Luscinia in different habitats and geographical areas. Behaviour 98: 274-285.
96. Stutchbury, B. J. M., & E. S. Morton. 2001. Behavioral ecology of tropical birds. Academic Press, New York, New York.
97. Terborgh, J. 1985. The vertical component of plant species diversity in temperate and tropical forests. Am. Nat. 126: 760-776.
98. Terborgh, J., S. K. Robinson, T. A. Parker III, C. A. Munn, & N. Pierpont. 1990. Structure and organization of an Amazonian forest bird community. Ecol. Monogr. 60: 213-238.
99. Tubaro, P. L., & D. A. Lijtmaer. 2006. Environmental correlates of song structure in forest grosbeaks and saltators. Condor 108: 120-129.
100. Tubaro, P. L., & E. T. Segura. 1994. Dialect differences in the song of Zonotrichia capensis in the southern pampas: a test of the acoustic adaptation hypothesis. Condor 96: 1084-1088.
101. Tubaro, P. L., & E. T. Segura. 1995. Geographic, ecological and subspecific variation in the song of the Rufous-browed Peppershrike (Cyclarhis gujanensis). Condor 97: 792-803.
102. Vallet, E., & M. Kreutzer. 1995. Female canaries are sexually responsive to special song phrases. Anim. Behav. 49: 1603-1610.
103. Van Buskirk, J., 1997. Independent evolution of song structure and note structure in American wood warblers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 264: 755-761.
104. Waas, J. R. 1988. Song pitch-habitat relationships in White-throated Sparrow: cracks in the acoustic windows? Can. J. Zool. 66: 2578-2581.
105. Waser, P. M., & Brown, C. H. 1986. Habitat acoustics and primate communication. Am. J. Primatol. 10: 135-154.
106. Wasserman, F. E. 1979. The relationship between habitat and song in the White-throated Sparrow. Condor 81: 424-426.
107. Westcott, D. A., & F. J. Kroon. 2002. Geographic song variation and its consequences in the Golden Bowerbird. Condor 104: 750-760.
108. Wilczynski, W., M. J. Ryan, & E. A. Brenowitz. 1989. The display of the Blue-black Grassquit - the acoustic advantage of getting high. Ethology 80: 218-222.
109. Wiley, R. H. 1991. Associations of song properties with habitats for territorial oscine birds of eastern North America. Am. Nat. 138: 973-993.
110. Wiley, R. H., & D. G. Richards. 1978. Physical constraints on acoustic communication in the atmosphere: implications for the evolution of animal vocalizations. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 3: 69-94.
111. Wiley, R. H., & D. G. Richards. 1982. Adaptations for acoustic communication in birds: sound transmission and signal detection. Pp. 131-181 in Kroodsma, D. E., E. H. Miller, & H. Quellet (eds.). Acoustic communication in birds. Volume I. Academic Press, New York, New York.
112. Williams, J. M., & P. J. B. Slater. 1993. Does Chaffinch Fringilla coelebs song vary with the habitat in which it is sung? Ibis 135: 202-208.