Use of Doppler ultrasonography to predict pre-eclampsia

CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association Journal

Volumn 179, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 53-

  Conde Agudelo, Agustín ^a   Lindheimer, Marshall ^b  

^a EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DOPPLER ECHOGRAPHY; HIGH RISK PREGNANCY; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; LETTER; PREECLAMPSIA; PUBLISHING; SCREENING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UTERINE ARTERY;

EID: 47049113709     PISSN: 08203946     EISSN: 14882329     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1080039     Document Type: Letter

References (6)

1. Cnossen JS, Morris RK, ter Riet G, et al. Use of uterine artery Doppler ultrasonography to predict pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review and bivariable meta-analysis. CMAJ 2008;178:701-11.
2. Conde-Agudelo A, Villar J, Lindheimer M. World Health Organization systematic review of screening tests for preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:1367-91.
3. Lijmer JG, Bossuyt PM, Heisterkamp SH. Exploring sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic tests. Stat Med 2002;21:1525-37.
4. Song F, Khan KS, Dinnes J, et al. Asymmetric funnel plots and publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy. Int J Epidemiol 2002;31:88-95.
5. Zwinderman AH, Bossuyt PM. We should not pool diagnostic likelihood ratios in systematic reviews. Stat Med 2008;27:687-97.
6. Shapiro DE. Issues in combining independent estimates of the sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic test. Acad Radiol 1995;2:S37-S47.