Exploiting semantic web services in achieving flexible application integration in the microelectronics field

Computers in Industry

Volumn 59, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 722-740

  Izza, S ^a   Vincent, L ^a   Burlat, P ^a  

^a ECOLE DES MINES DE SAINT ETIENNE   (France)

Author keywords

Flexibility; Integration; Ontology; Semantics; Service

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SERVICES; INFORMATION THEORY; MICROELECTRONICS; ONTOLOGY; SEMANTIC WEB; STANDARDS; WEB SERVICES; WORLD WIDE WEB;

APPLICATION INTEGRATION; ELSEVIER (CO); IN ORDER; INTER-OPERATION; SEMANTIC INTEGRATION; SEMANTIC MEDIATION; SEMANTIC WEB SERVICES (SWS); SERVICE ORIENTED ARCHITECTURES (SOAS); SERVICE-ORIENTED;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 47049111044     PISSN: 01663615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2007.12.015     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aerts A.T.M., Goossenaerts J.B.M., Hammer D.K., and Wormann J.C. Architectures in Context-On the Evolution of Business, Application Software and ICT Platform Architectures (2003), Elsevier
2. Alexiev V., Breu M., de Bruijn J., Fensel D., Lara R., and Lausen H. Information Integration with Ontologies: Experiences from an Industrial Showcase (2005), John Wiley & Sons Ed, Berlin
3. Amjad U. The Emerging Role of the Web for Enterprise. Proceedings of the IEEE 92 9 (2004) 1420-1438
4. Berners-Lee T., James Hendler J., and Lassila O. The Semantic Web. Scientific American 279 5 (2001) 34-43
5. Bussler C. The Role of Semantic Web Technology in EAI. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin 26 4 (2003) 62-68
6. Corcho O., Fernandez-Lopez M., and Gomez-Pérez A. Methodologies, Tools and Languages for Building Ontologies. Elsevier, Data & Knowledge Engineering 46 (2003) 42-64
7. Cui Z., Jones D., and O'Brien P. Semantic B2B integration: issues in ontology-based approaches. ACM-SIGMOD Record 31-1 (2002) 43-48
8. DIP, Deliverables of DIP Project, 2005, http://dip.semanticweb.org.
9. Dogac A., Kabak Y., Laleci G., Sinir S.S., Yildiz A., Kirbas S., and Gurcan Y. Semantically Enriched Web Services for the Travel Industry. SIGMOD Record 33 3 (2004) 21-27
10. D. Fensel, et al., Web Service Modelling Ontology (WSMO) W3C Member Submission, 2005, http://www.w3.org/Submission/2005/SUBM-WSMO-20050603/.
11. C.H. Goh, Representing and Reasoning about Semantic Conflicts in Heterogeneous Information Sources, Ph.D. Thesis, MIT, MA, 1997.
12. Gruber R.T. Towards principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 43 5/6 (1995) 907-928
13. Heiler S. Semantic interoperability. ACM Computing Survey 27 2 (1995) 271-273
14. IEEE, Recommendation Practice for Architectural Description of Software-Intensive Systems, IEEE Std 1471 (2000).
15. S. Izza, L. Vincent, P. Burlat, A Framework for Semantic Enterprise Integration, INTEROP-ESA'05, Geneva, Switzerland, 2005, pp. 78-89.
16. Izza S., Vincent L., Burlat P., Lebrun P., and Solignac H. Extending OWL-S to Solve Enterprise Application Integration Issues. Interoperability for Enterprise Software and Applications Conference (I-ESA'06). Bordeaux, France (2006)
17. H. Kadima, V. Monfort, Les Web Services, Dunod, 2003.
18. Kalfoglou Y., and Schorlemmer M. Ontology Mapping: The State of The Art. The Knowledge Engineering Review 18 1 (2003) 1-31
19. Klein M. Combining and relating ontologies: an analysis of problems and solutions. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), Workshop on Ontologies and Information Sharing. Seattle, USA (2001)
20. KnowledgeWeb, Deliverables of Knowledge Web Project, 2005, http://knowledgeweb.semanticweb.org/.
21. Longépé C. Le projet d'urbanisation du système d'information (2002), Dunod, Paris
22. Lutz J.C. EAI Architecture patterns. eAI Journal (2000)
23. McGuinness D.L., Fikes R., Rice J., and Wilder S. The Chimaera ontology environment. Proceedings of the 17th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2000) pp. 1123-1124
24. Mena E., Kashyap V., Sheth A., and Illarramendi A. OBSERVER. Proceedings of the 1st IFCIS International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems. Brussels (1996)
25. METEOR-S, Deliverables of METEOR-S Project, 2005, http://lsdis.cs.uga.edu/Projects/METEOR-S/.
26. Miller R.J., Hernández M., Haas L.M., Yan L.-L., Ho T.H., Fagin R., and Popa L. The Clio Project: Managing Heterogeneity. SIGMOD Record 30 1 (2001) 78-83
27. Noy N.F., and Musen M.A. The prompt suite: interactive tools for ontology merging and mapping. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 59 6 (2003) 983-1024
28. Noy N.F. Semantic integration: a survey of ontology based approaches. SIGMOD'04 (2004)
29. OWL-S, Semantic Markup for Web Services, 2004, http://www.daml.org/services/.
30. M. Pontacq, Commerce électronique sur Internet, Architecture des solutions. Techniques de l'ingénieur H5304 (2002), 1-13.
31. A. Raut, A. Basavaraja, Enterprise Business Process Integration, TENCON, Poster Paper, IEEE, 2003.
32. Sassoon J. Urbanisation des systèmes d'information (1998), Hermes, Paris
33. Stuckenschmidt H., Wache H., Vogele T., and Visser U. Enabling technologies for interoperability. Workshop on the 14th ISCSEP. Germany (2000) 35-46
34. Uschold M., and Gruninger M. Ontologies: principles, methods and applications. Knowledge Engineering Review 11 2 (1996) 93-155
35. W3C, World Wide Web Consortium, 2004, www.w3.org.
36. WSDL2OWL-S, 2005, http://projects.semwebcentral.org/projects/wsdl2owl-s/.
37. Wache H., Vögele T., Visser U., Stuckenschmidt H., Schuster G., Neumann H., and Hübner S. Ontology-based integration of information-a survey of existing approaches. In: Stuckenschmidt H. (Ed). IJCAI'01 Workshop on Ontologies and Information Sharing, Seattle (2001) 108-117
38. Young P., Chaki N., and Berzins V. Evaluation of Middleware Architectures in Achieving System Interoperability, 14th IEEE International Workshop on Rapid Systems Prototyping (RSP'03) (2003) pp. 108-116