Avaliando resultados de um programa de transferência de renda: O impacto do bolsa-escola sobre os gastos das famílias Brasileiras

Estudos Economicos

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 235-265

  Resende, Anne Caroline Costa ^a   De Oliveira, Ana Maria Hermeto Camilo ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UFMG e do CEDEPLAR

^c Hospital Mater Dei   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Conditional cash transfer programs; Expenditures; Propensity score matching

Indexed keywords

EID: 47049110922     PISSN: 01014161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0101-41612008000200002     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. ATTANAZIO, O. et al. How effective are conditional cash transfers? evidence from Colombia. London: The Institute for Fiscal Studies, 2005. (Briefing Note, n. 54) Disponível em: 〈http://www.ifs.org.uk/ publications.php〉. Acesso em: 12/11/2006.
2. ATTANAZIO, O.; MEGHIR, C.; VERA-HERNANDEZ, M. et al. Baseline report on the evaluation of familias en acción. London: The Institute for Fiscal Studies, 2004. Disponível em: 〈http://www.ifs.org.ulc/ publications.php〉. Acesso em: 12/11/2006.
3. ATTANAZIO, O., MESNARD, A. The impact of a conditional cash transfer programme on consumption in Colombia. London: The Institute for Fiscal Studies, 2005. Disponível em: 〈http://www.ifs.org.uk/publications. php〉. Acesso em: 12/11/2006.
4. BECKER S.O.; ICHINO, A. Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity score. Stata Journal, v. 2, n. 4, p. 358-377, 2002. Disponível em: 〈http://www.sobecker.de/pscore.html.〉. Acesso em: 12/11/2006.
5. BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Avaliação do programa Bolsa-Alimentação. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Saúde, 2003. (Estudo 02: Análise de impacto preliminar)
6. CALIENDO, M.; KOPEINIG, S. Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), 2005. (IZA Discussion Papers, 1588)
7. CAMERON, A. C.; TRIVEDI, P. K. Microeconometrics: methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
8. DAS, J.; DO, Q.; ÖZLER, B. Conditional Cash Transfer and the Equity-Efficiency Debate. World Bank, Research working paper, WPS 3280, 2004
9. DEHEJIA, R. Practical propensity score matching: a reply to Smith and Todd. Journal of Econometrics, v. 125, n. 1-2, p. 355-364, 2005.
10. DIPRETE, T.; GANGL, M. Assessing bias in the estimation of causal effects: Rosenbaum bounds on matching estimators and instrumental variables estimation with imperfect instruments. Sociological Methodology, v. 34, n. 1, p. 271-310, Abr. 2004. Disponível em: 〈http://www.wjh.harvard. edu/~winship/cfa_papers/HBprop_021204.pdf〉. Acesso em: 12/11/2006.
11. FERREIRA, F.; LEITE, P.; LITCHFIELD, J. The rise and fall of Brazilian inequality: 1981-2004. Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 2006. (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 3867)
12. HECKMAN, J.; ICHIMURA, H.; TODD, P. Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: evidence from evaluating a job training program. Review of Economic Studies, v. 64(4), n. 221, p. 605-654, Oct. 1997.
13. HECKMAN, J.; LALONDE, R.; SMITH, J. The economics and econometrics of active labor market programs. In: ASHENFELTER, O., CARD, D. (Eds.) The Handbook of Labor Economics. Amsterdam: North Holland, v. 3A, part. 6, cap. 31, p. 1865-2097, 1999.
14. HIRANO, K.; IMBENS, G. W.; REDDER, G. Efficient estimation of average treatment effects using the estimated propensity score. Cambridge, MA.: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2000. (NBER Technical Working Paper, n.251). Disponível em: 〈http://ideas.repec.org/s/nbr/nberwo. html〉. Acesso em: 04/01/2006.
15. HUJER, R.; CALIENDO, M.; THOMSEN, S. New evidence on the effects of job creation schemes is Germany: a matching approach with threefold heterogeneity. Bonn, Germany: IZA, 2004. (Working Paper, 750)
16. IMBENS, G.W. The role of propensity score in estimating dose: response functions. Biometrika, v. 87, n. 3, p.706-710, 2000.
17. RESENDE, A.C.C. Avaliando resultados de um programa de transferência de renda: O impacto do Bolsa-Escola sobre os gastos das famílias brasileiras. 2006. Dissertação (Mestrado), CEDEPLAR/UFMG.
18. RAWLINGS, L. B.; RUBIO, G. M. Evaluating the impact of conditional cash transfer programs: lessons form Latin America. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2003. Disponível em: 〈World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3119〉. Acesso em: 05/05/2006.
19. ROCHA, S. Impacto sobre a pobreza dos novos programas federais de transferência de renda. Revista Economia Contemporânea, v. 9, n. 1, p. 153-185, jan./abr. 2005.
20. _. Pobreza no Brasil: o que mudou nos últimos 30 anos? Rio de Janeiro: INAE - Instituto Nacional de Altos Estudos, 2004. (Estudos e pesquisas, n. 83)
21. ROSENBAUM, P Observational Studies, Springer, New York. 2002.
22. _;- RUBIN, D. B. The Central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, v. 70, n. 1, p. 41-55, 1983.
23. SOARES, S. Distribuição de renda no Brasil de 1976 a 2004 com ênfase no período entre 2001 e 2004. Brasília: IPEA, 2006. (Texto para discussão, n.1 166) Disponível em: 〈http://www.ipea.gov.br/pub/td/2006/td_1166.pdf〉. Acesso em: 30/11/2006.
24. VAZ, B. L. O.; ASSUNÇÃO, J. J. Efeito do programa Bolsa-Escola sobre as despesas das famílias. 2006. Dissertação (Mestrado), PUC-Rio.
25. VENETOKLIS, T. An Evaluation of wage subsidy programs to SMEs utilizing propensity score matching. Helsinki: Government Institute for Economic Research, 2004. VATT Research Reports, 104. Disponível em: 〈http://en.vatt.fi/file/vatt_publication_pdf/t106.pdf〉. Acesso em: 12/11/2006.
26. WATSON, I. The earnings of casual employees: the problem of unobservables. Paper presented to HILDA Survey Research Conference, University of Melbourne, 28-29 September 2005.
27. ZHAO, Z. Sensitivity of propensity score methods to the specifications. Bonn, Germany Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), 2005. (IZA Discussion Papers, 1873).