Evaluation of the Crux IVC filter in an animal model

Journal of Endovascular Therapy

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 292-299

  Murphy, Erin H ^a   White, Rodney A ^b   Rosenthal, David ^c   Johnson, Eric D ^d   Zarins, Christopher K ^e   Fogarty, Thomas J ^e   Arko, Frank R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b HARBOR UCLA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c ATLANTA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d Research and Development Crux Biomedical   (United States)

^e STANFORD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Experimental study; Inferior vena cava; IVC filter; Ovine model; Pulmonary embolism; Retrievable filter

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BLOOD VESSEL INJURY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE REMOVAL; FILTER; FLUOROSCOPY; FOLLOW UP; HISTOLOGY; INFERIOR CAVA VEIN; INFERIOR VENA CAVA FILTER; INFLAMMATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAFETY; SHEEP; VASCULAR PATENCY;

ALLOYS; ANIMALS; CATHETERIZATION; DEVICE REMOVAL; ENDOSCOPY; MATERIALS TESTING; MODELS, ANIMAL; PHLEBOGRAPHY; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; SHEEP; TIME FACTORS; VENA CAVA FILTERS; VENA CAVA, INFERIOR;

EID: 47049097691     PISSN: 15266028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1583/08-2374.1     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Greenfield LJ. Venous thrombosis and pulmonary thromboembolism. In: Greenfield LJ, Mulholland M, Oldham KT, et al., eds. Surgery: Scientific Principles and Practice, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1997.
2. Hyers TM, Agnelli G, Hull RD, et al. Antithrom-botic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease. Chest. 1998;114:561-578.
3. Becker DM, Philbrick JT, Selby JB. Inferior vena cava filters. Indications, safety, effectiveness. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:1985-1994.
4. Rohrer MJ, Scheidler MG, Wheeler HB. Extended indications for placement of an inferior vena cava filter. J Vase Surg. 1989;10:44-50.
5. Linsenmaier U, Rieger J, Schenk F, et al. Indications, management, and complications of temporary inferior vena cava filters. Cardio-vasc Intervent Radiol. 1998;21:464-469.
6. Winkler WB, Slany J. Vena cava filter for prevention of pulmonary embolism. Vasa. 1999;28:250-258.
7. Peterson L. Inferior vena cava filters. Trends Med. 2003.
8. Stein PD, Kayali F, Olson RE. Twenty-one-year trends in the use of inferior vena cava filters. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1541-1545.
9. Tola JC, Holtzman R, Lottenberg L. Bedside placement of inferior vena cava filters in the intensive care unit. Am Surg. 1999;65:833-837.
10. Ray CE, Mitchell E, Zipsor S, et al. Outcomes with retrievable inferior vena cava filters: a multicenter study. J Vase Interv Radiol. 2006; 17:1595-1604.
11. De Gregorio MA, Gimeno MJ, Lostale F, et al. Retrievability of uncoated versus paclitaxel-coated Gunther-Tulip IVC filters in an animal model. J Vase Interv Radiol. 2004;15:719-726.
12. Reekers JA, Hoogeveen YL, Wijnands M, et al. Evaluation of the retrievability of the OptEase IVC filter in an animal model. J Vase Interv Radiol. 2004;15:261-267.
13. Hoekstra A, Hoogeveen Y, Elstrodt JM, et al. Vena cava filter behavior and endovascular response: an experimental in vivo study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2003;26:222-226.
14. Brountzos EN, Kaufman JA, Venbrux AC, et al. A new optional vena cava filter: retrieval at 12 weeks in an animal model. J Vase Interv Radiol. 2003;14:763-772.
15. Neuerburg JM, Handt S, Beckert K, et al. Percutaneous retrieval of the Tulip vena cava filter: feasibility, short- and long-term chang-es-an experimental study in dogs. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2001;24:418-423.
16. Trerotola SO, McLennan G, Eclavea AC, et al. Mechanical thrombolysis of venous thrombosis in an animal model with use of temporary caval filtration. J Vase Interv Radiol. 2001;12: 1075-1085.
17. Bucker A, Neuerburg JM, Adam GB, et al. Realtime MR guidance for inferior vena cava filter placement in an animal model. J Vase Interv Radiol. 2001;12:753-756.
18. Proctor MC, Greenfield LJ, Cho KJ, et al. Assessment of apparent vena caval penetration by the Greenfield filter. J Endovasc Surg. 1998;5:251-258.
19. Haage P, Tacke J, Bovelander J, et al. Prototype percutaneous thrombolytic device: pre-clinical testing in subacute inferior vena caval thrombosis in a pig model. Radiology. 2001;220:135-141.
20. Allen TL, Carter JL, Morrs BJ, et al. Retrievable vena cava filters in trauma patients for high-risk prophylaxis and prevention of pulmonary embolism. Am J Surg. 2005,189: 656-661.
21. Offner PJ, Hawkes A, Madayag R, et al. The role of temporary inferior vena cava filters in critically ill surgical patients. Arch Surg. 2003; 138:591-594.
22. Hoff WS, Hoey BA, Wainwright GA, et al. Early experience with retrievable inferior vena cava filters in high-risk trauma patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;199:869-874.
23. Morris CS, Rogers FB, Najarian KE, et al. Current trends in vena cava filtration with the introduction of a retrievable filter at a level I trauma center. J Trauma. 2004;57:32-36.
24. Athanasoulis CA, Kaufman JA, Halpern EF, et al. Inferior vena cava filters: review of a 26-year single-center clinical experience. Radiology. 2000;216:54-66.
25. Marx MV, Tauscher JR, Williams DM, et al. Evaluation of the inferior vena cava with intravascular US after Greenfield filter placement. J Vase Interv Radiol. 1991;2:261-268.
26. Binkert CA, Bansal A, Gates JD. Inferior vena cava filter removal after 317-day implantation. J Vase Interv Radiol. 2005,16:395-398.
27. Crochet D, Grossetete R, Bach-Lijour B, et al. Evaluation of the LGM Vena-Tech infrarenal vena cava filter in an ovine venous thrombo-embolism model. J Vase Interv Radiol. 2001;12: 739-745.