Evaluation of wall motion and dynamic geometry of the inferior vena cava using intravascular ultrasound: Implications for future device design

Journal of Endovascular Therapy

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 349-355

  Murphy, Erin H ^a   Johnson, Eric D ^a   Arko, Frank R ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Diameter changes; Inferior vena cava; Intravascular ultrasound; Respiration

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; BREATHING PATTERN; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; FILTER; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; INFERIOR CAVA VEIN; INFERIOR VENA CAVA FILTER; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; KIDNEY VEIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STUDENT T TEST; VALSALVA MANEUVER; VEIN DIAMETER;

AWARDS AND PRIZES; HUMANS; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESPIRATION; SUPINE POSITION; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; VALSALVA MANEUVER; VENA CAVA FILTERS; VENA CAVA, INFERIOR;

EID: 47049092033     PISSN: 15266028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1583/08-2424.1     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Grant E, Rendano F, Sevinc E, et al. Normal inferior vena cava: caliber changes observed by dynamic ultrasound. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1980;135:335-338.
2. Arko F, Murphy E, Davis C, et al. Dynamic geometry and wall thickness of abdominal aortic aneurysms using intravascular ultraso-nography. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46:891-897.
3. Draney M, Arko F, Alley M, et al. Quantification of vessel wall motion and cyclic strain using cine phase contrast MRI: in vivo validation in the porcine aorta. Magn Reson Med. 2004;52:286-295.
4. Draney M, Herfkens R, Hughes T, et al. Quantification of vessel wall cyclic strain using cine phase contrast MRI. Ann Biomed Eng. 2002;30:1033-1045.
5. Stein PD, Alnas M, Skaf E, et al. Outcome and complications of retrievable inferior vena cava filters. Am J Cardiol. 2004;94:1090-1093.
6. Kinney TB. Update on inferior vena cava filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14:425-440.
7. Streiff M. Vena caval filters: a comprehensive review. Blood. 2000;95:3669-3677.
8. Hann CL, Strieff MB. The role of vena caval filters in the management of venous thromboembolism. Blood Rev. 1005,19:179-202.
9. Vergara GR, Wallace WF, Bennett KR. Spontaneous migration of an inferior vena cava filter resulting in cardiac tamponade and percutaneous filter retrieval. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007;69:300-302.
10. Rossi P, Arata FM, Bonaiuti P. Fatal outcome in atrial migration of the tempofilter. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1999;22:227-231.
11. Hussain SM, McLafferty RB, Schmittling ZC. Superior vena cava perforation and cardiac tamponade after filter placement in the superior vena cava - a case report. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2005;39:367-370.
12. Sing RF, Rogers FB, Novitsky YW, et al. Optional vena cava filters for patients with high thromboembolic risk: questions to be answered. Surg Innov. 2005;12:195-202.
13. Berne RM, Levy MN. Cardiovascular Physiology. St. Louis: Mosby; 2001.
14. EbaughJL,ChiouAC,Morasch MD, et al. Bedside vena cava filter placement guided with intravas-cular ultrasound. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34:32-36.
15. Friedland M, Kazmers A, Kline R, et al. Vena cava duplex imaging before caval interruption. J Vasc Surg. 1996;24:608-613.
16. Greenfield LJ, Savian MA. Comparison of titanium and stainless steel Greenfield vena caval filters. Surgery. 1989;106:820-828.