Surfactant separation in pressure-driven membrane processes

Environment Protection Engineering

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 105-113

  Kowalska, Izabela ^a  

^a WROCLAW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLOIDS; CRITICAL MICELLE CONCENTRATION; FOOD PROCESSING; ISOMERS; KETONES; MICELLES; NANOFILTRATION; SEPARATION; SOLUTIONS; SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS; TRANSPORT PROPERTIES; ULTRAFILTRATION;

(001) PARAMETER; (PL) PROPERTIES; CONCENTRATION RANGES; CRITICAL MICELLE CONCENTRATION~; HYD RAULIC PERFORMANCE; MEMBRANE PROCESSES; MODEL SOLUTIONS; POLYMER MEMBRANES; RETENTION COEFFICIENTS; SURFACTANT CONCENTRATIONS; SURFACTANT SOLUTIONS; ULTRAFILTRATION (UF) MEMBRANES; ULTRAFILTRATION PROCESS (UFP);

NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES;

EID: 46949100417     PISSN: 03248828     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. KOŁTUNIEWICZ A., NOWORYTA A., Method of yield evaluation for pressure-driven membrane processes, The Chemical Engineering Journal, 1995, 58, 175-182.
2. MULLIGAN C.N., YONG R.N., GIBBS B.F., Surfactant-enhanced remediation of contaminated soil: a review, Engineering Geology, 2001, 60, 371-380.
3. FERNANDEZ E., BENITO J.M., PAZOS C, COCA J., Cermaic membrane ultrafiltration of anionic and nonionic surfactant solutions, Journal of Membrane Science, 2005, 246, 1-6.
4. BENITO I., GARCIA M.A., SAZ J.M., MARINA M.L., Spectophotometric and conductometric determination of the critical micellar concentration of sodium dodecyl sulfate and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide micellar systems modified by alcohols and salts, Colloid and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 1997, 125, 221-224.
5. KO S., SCHLAUTMANANDE M.A., CARRAWAY R., Effects of solution chemistry on the partitioning of phenanthrene to sorbed surfactants, Environmental Science & Technology, 1998, 32, 3542-3548.
6. SHIAO Y., CHHABRA V., PATIST A., FREE M.L., HUIBERSS P.D.T., GREGORY A., PATEL S., SHAH D.O., Chain length compatibility effects in mixed surfactant systems for technological application, Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 1998, 74, 1-29.
7. FUGUET E., RAFOLS C., ROSES M., BOSCH E., Critical micelle concentration of surfactants in aqueous buffered and unbuffered systems, Analytica Chimica Acta, 2005, 548, 95-100.
8. The catalogue of Nadir® membranes.
9. JONSSON A.S., JONSSON B., The influence of nonionic and ionic surfactants on hydrophobic and hydrophilic ultrafiltration membranes, Journal of Membrane Science, 1991, 56, 49-76.
10. MIZOGUCHI K., FUKUI K., YANAGISHITA H., NAKANE T., NAKATA T., Ultrafiltration behavior of a new type of non-ionic surfactant around the CMC, Journal of Membrane Science, 2002, 208, 285-288.
11. KUMAR S., SHARMA D., KABIRUD D., Small-angle neutron scattering studies on sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate- tetra-n-butylammonium bromide system, Journal of Surfactants and Detergents, 2006, 9, 77-82.