2.5-D modeling of cross-hole electromagnetic measurement by finite element method

Petroleum Science

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 126-134

  Shen, Jinsong ^a   Sun, Wenbo ^a  

^a CHINA UNIVERSITY OF PETROLEUM   (China)

Author keywords

2.5 D; Electromagnetic modeling; Frequency domain; Isoparametric finite element; Pseudo delta function

Indexed keywords

EID: 46949100113     PISSN: 16725107     EISSN: 19958226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12182-008-0020-6     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Abubakar A., Habashy T., Druskin V., et al. Two-and-half dimensional Forward and Inverse Modeling for Marine CSEM Problems. 76th Ann. Internat. Mtg. Soc. Expl. Geophys. Expanded Abstracts. 2006: 750-754
2. Avdeeva A., Commer M., and Newman, G. A. Hydrocarbon reservoir detectability study for marine CSEM methods: Time domain versus frequency domain, 77th Ann. Internat. Mtg. Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts. 2007: 628-632
3. Buell J C. A hybrid numerical method for three-dimensional spatially developing free shear flows. Journal of Computational Physics. 1991. 95(2): 313-338
4. Constable K S. and Weiss C. Mapping 3D salt using 2D marine MT: Case study from Gemini Prospect, Gulf of Mexico: 74th Annual International Mtg. Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 2004: 596-599
5. Constable, S C. Marine electromagnetic methods - A new tool for offshore exploration: The Leading Edge. 2006. 25: 438-444
6. Constable S C and Srnka L J. An introduction to marine controlledsource electromagnetic methods for hydrocarbon exploration. Geophysics. 2007.72(2): WA3-WA12
7. David L A and Morrison H F. Theoretical and practical considerations for cross well electromagnetic tomography assuming a cylindrical geometry. Geophysics. 1995. 60(3): 846-870
8. Davydycheva S., Druskin V. and Habashy T. An efficient finitedifference scheme for electromagnetic logging in 3D anisotropic inhomogeneous media. Geophysics. 2003. 68(5): 1525-1536
9. Druskin V and Knizhnerman L. Spectral approach to solving threedimensional Maxwell's diffusion equations in the time and frequency domains. Radio Science. 1994. 29(4): 937-953
10. Edwards N. Marine controlled source electromagnetics: Principles and methodologies-future commercial applications: Surveys in Geophysics. 2005. 26(2): 675-700
11. Ellingsrud S., Eidesmo T., Johansen S., et al. Remote sensing of hydrocarbon layers by seabed logging (SBL): Results from a cruise offshore Angola. The Leading Edge. 2002. 7: 972-982
12. Everett M E and Edwards R N. Transient marine electromagnetics: The 2.5-D forward problem. Geophysical Journal International. 1993. 113(3): 545-561
13. Farrelly B., Ringstad C., Johnstad S E., et al. Remote characterization of hydrocarbon filled reservoirs at the Troll Field by Sea Bed Logging. EAGE Fall Research Workshop. Rhodes. Greece 19th-23rd September. 2004: 662-668
14. Furumura T and Takenaka H. 2.5-D modeling of elastic waves using the pseudo-spectral method. Geophysical Journal International. 1996. 124: 820-832
15. Gallardo L A. and Meju M A. Characterization of heterogeneous nearsurface materials by joint 2D inversion of DC resistivity and seismic data. Geophysical Research Letters. 2003. 30: 1658-1670
16. Goldman Y, Hubans C, Nicoletis S, et al. A finite element solution for the transient electromagnetic response of an arbitrary two-dimensional resistivity distribution. Geophysics. 1986. 51: 1450-1461
17. Herrmann R B. SH-wave generation by dislocation source- A numerical study. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 1979. 69(1): 1-15
18. Hou J. and Torres-Verdín C. Finite-difference modeling of EM fields using coupled potentials in 3D anisotropic media: Application to borehole logging: 73rd Annual International Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts. 2003: 522-525
19. Hoversten G M., Gritto R., Washbourne J. et al. Pressure and fluid saturation prediction in a multi-component reservoir, using combined seismic and electromagnetic imaging. Geophysics. 2003. 68(5): 1580-1591
20. Hoversten G M. and Newman G A. 3D numerical simulation of a deepwater EM exploration survey. 74th Annual International Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts. 2004: 672-675
21. Hoversten G M., Newman G. A., Geier N., et al. 3D modeling of a deepwater EM exploration survey. Geophysics. 2006. 71(5): G239-G248
22. Johansen S E., Amundsen H E., Rosten T., et al. Subsurface hydrocarbons detected by electromagnetic sounding. First Break. 2005. 23: 31-36
23. Kong F N., Johnstad S E., Røsten T. et al. A 2.5D finite-element modeling difference method for marine CSEM modeling in stratified anisotropic media. 2008. Geophysics. 73(1): F9-F19
24. Leppin M. Electromagnetic modeling of 3-D sources over 2-D inhomogeneities in the time domain. Geophysics. 1992. 57(8): 994-1003
25. Liu S X and Sato M. Application of borehole radar for subsurface physical measurement. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering. 2004. 1(3): 221-227
26. MacGregor L M., Andreis D., Tomlinson J., et al. Controlled-source electromagnetic imaging on the Nuggets-1 reservoir. The Leading Edge. 2006. 25: 984-992
27. Smith J T. Conservative modeling of 3-D electromagnetic fields, Part2: Biconjugate gradient solution and an accelerator. Geophysics. 1996. 61(5): 1319-1324
28. Spies B R and Frischknecht F C. Electromagnetic sounding. Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics: Application. in Nabighian, M. N., Ed., Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics-theory. 1991. Vol.2: Soc. Explor. Geophys: 431-443
29. Spies B R and Habashy T M. Sensitivity analysis of cross-well electromagnetics. Geophysics. 1995. 60(3): 834-845
30. Srnka L J., Carrazone J J., Eriksen E A. et al. Remote reservoir resistivity mapping - An overview. The Leading Edge. 2006. 25: 972-975
31. Stoyer C H. and Greenfield R J. Numerical solutions of the response of a two-dimensional earth to an oscillating magnetic dipole source, Geophysics. 1976. 41(2): 519-530
32. Sugeng F, Raiche A, and Xiong Z. Modeling topographic effects using an isoparametric finite element method. The 13th Workshop on Electromagnetic Induction in the Earth. Abstracts. 1996: 109-110
33. Tompkins M J. Marine controlled source electromagnetic imaging for hydrocarbon exploration: Interpreting subsurface electrical properties. First Break. 2004. 22: 45-51
34. Ueda T and Zhdanov M S. Fast numerical modeling of marine controlled source electromagnetic data using quasi-liner method. 75th Annual International Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts. 2005: 231-235
35. Unsworth M J, Travis B J, and Chave A D. Electromagnetic induction by a finite electric dipole source over a 2-D earth. Geophysics. 1993. 58(2): 198-214
36. Ward S H. and Hohmann G W. Electromagnetic theory for geophysical applications. in Nabighian M. N., Ed., Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics-theory. Soc. Explor. Geophys. 1988. 1: 131-311
37. Weiss C J. and Newman G A. Electromagnetic induction in a generalized 3D anisotropic earth, part 2: The LIN preconditioner. Geophysics, 2003. 68(3): 922-930
38. Zaslavsky M, Davdycheva S., Druskin V. et al. Finite difference solution of the three-dimensional electromagnetic problem using divergence free preconditioners. 76th Ann. Internet. Mtg. Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts. 2006: 775-778
39. Zhdanov M.S., Gribenco A. and Cuma M. Regularized focusing inversion of marine CSEM data using minimum vertical support stabilizer, 77th Ann. Internet. Mtg. Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts. 2007: 579-583
40. Zienkiewicz O C. The finite element method: Third edition. McGraw-Hill. 1977