Gender differences in self-reported drinking-induced disinhibition of sexual behaviors

American Journal on Addictions

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 293-297

  Hesse, Morten ^a   Tutenges, Sébastien ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALCOHOLISM; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; SELF REPORT; SEX DIFFERENCE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; VALIDITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALCOHOL DRINKING; ALCOHOLIC INTOXICATION; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; ETHANOL; EUPHORIA; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SEX FACTORS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; TRAVEL;

EID: 46849117057     PISSN: 10550496     EISSN: 15210391     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10550490802138822     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Sumnall HR, Beynon CM, Conchie SM, Riley SC, Cole JC. An investigation of the subjective experiences of sex after alcohol or drug intoxication. J Psychopharmacology. 2007;21:525-537.
2. Bellis C, Hughes K. Sex potions. Relationships between alcohol, drugs and sex. Addiciones. 2004;16:251-260.
3. Coleman LM, Cater SM. A qualitative study of the relationship between alcohol consumption and risky sex in adolescents. Arch SexBehav. 2005;34:649-661.
4. Fillmore MT, Weafer J. Alcohol impairment of behavior in men and women. Addiction. 2004;99:1237-1246.
5. Kim JL, Sorsoli CL, Collins K, Zylbergold BL, Schooler D, Tolman DL. From sex to sexuality: Exposing the heterosexual script on primetime network television. J Sex Res. 2007;44:145-157.
6. Alexander MG, Fisher TD. Truth and consequences: using the bogus pipeline to examine sex differences in self-reported sexuality. J Sex Res. 2003;40:27-35.
7. Fisher TD. Sex of experimenter and social norm effects on reports of sexual behavior in young men and women. Arch Sex Behav. 2007;36:89-100.
8. Leeman RF, Toll BA, Volpicelli JR. The Drinking-Induced Disinhibition Scale (DIDS): A measure of three types of disinhibiting effects. Addict Behav. 2007;32:1200-1219.
9. Korsgaard L. Travel agency limits pub crawls after fatality. Politiken. 2007. Accessed May 29, 2008, from http://politiken.dk./ indland/article3430350.ece
10. StatSoft. STATISTICA (data analysis software system). 2005, Tulsa, OK: StatSoft, Inc .
11. Hatcher L. A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 1994.
12. Mulaik SA, James LR, Van Alstine J, Bennett N, Lind S, Stilwell CD. Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychol Bull. 1989;105:430-445.
13. Bentler PM, Bonett DG. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol Bull. 1980;88:588-606.
14. Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990;107:238-246.
15. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling. 1999;6:1-55.
16. Brown MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Long JS, ed. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage; 1993:136-162.
17. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D. LISREL 8 User's Reference Guide. Chicago, Ill.: Scientific Software; 1993.