Alternative recurrent selection strategies using doubled haploid lines in hybrid maize breeding

Crop Science

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 911-922

  Gordillo, G Andres ^a   Geiger, Hartwig H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOHENHEIM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 46849113679     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2007.04.0223     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Barwick, S.A., and A.L. Henzell. 2005. Development successes and issues for the future in deriving and applying selection indexes for beef breeding. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 45:923-933.
2. Bichard, M., A.H.R. Pease, P.H. Swales, and K. Özkütük. 1973. Selection in a population with overlapping generations. Anim. Prod. 17:215-227.
3. Borchard, D.C. 1995. Optimierung von Methoden zur Züchtung von Zuckerrüben. (In German.) Ph.D. diss. Univ. of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
4. Bouchez, A., and A. Gallais. 2000. Efficiency of the use of doubled-haploids in recurrent selection for combining ability. Crop Sci. 40:23-29.
5. Brim, C.A., H.W. Johnson, and C.C. Cockerham. 1959. Multiple selection criteria in soybeans. Agron. J. 51:42-46.
6. Bulmer, M.G. 1980. The mathematical theory of quantitative genetics. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
7. Burrows, P.M. 1975. Expected selection differentials for directional selection. Biometrics 28:1091-1100.
8. Cochran, W.G. 1951. Improvement by means of selection. p. 449-470. In J. Neyman (ed.) Proc. 2nd Berkeley Symp. on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Berkeley, CA. 31 July-12 Aug. 1950. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley.
9. Crow, J.F., and M. Kimura. 1970. An introduction to population genetics theory. Harper & Row, New York.
10. Falconer, D.S., and T.F.C. Mackay. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 4th ed. Longman, Essex, UK.
11. Geiger, H.H., and A. Tomerius. 1997. Quantitative genetics and optimum breeding plans. p. 15-26. In P. Krajewski and Z. Kaczmarek (ed.) Proc. 10th Meeting of the EUCARPIA Section. Biometrics in Plant Breeding, Poznan, Poland. 14-16 May 1997. Institute of Plant Genetics, PAS, Poznan, Poland.
12. Gomez-Raya, L., and E.B. Burnside. 1990. The effect of repeated cycles of selection on genetic variance, heritability, and response. Theor. Appl. Genet. 79:568-574.
13. Gordillo, C.A., and H.H. Geiger. 2004. Estimating quantitative-genetic parameters of European maize populations to optimize hybrid breeding methods by model calculations (poster abstract). In J. Vollmann, H. Grausgruber, and P. Ruckenbauer (ed.) Proc. 17th EUCARPIA General Congress, Tulln, Austria. 8-11 Sept. 2004. BOKU, Univ. of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna.
14. Gordillo, G.A., and H.H. Geiger. 2008. MBP (version 1.0): A software package to optimize maize breeding procedures based on doubled haploid lines. J. Hered. 99:227-231.
15. Griffing, B. 1956. A generalized treatment of the use of diallel crosses in quantitative inheritance. Heredity 10:31-50.
16. Hallauer, A.R., and J.B. Miranda. 1988. Quantitative genetics in maize breeding. 2nd ed. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames.
17. Kempthorne, O. 1957. An introduction to genetics statistics. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
18. Milkman, R. 1978. Selection differentials and selection coefficients. Genetics 88:391-403.
19. Nomura, T. 2005. Developments in prediction theories of the effective size of populations under selection. J. Anim. Sci. 76:87-96.
20. Rendel, J.M., and A. Robertson. 1950. Estimation of genetic gain in milk yield by selection in a closed herd of dairy cattle. J. Genet. 50:1-8.
21. Röber, F.K., G.A. Gordillo, and H.H. Geiger. 2005. In vivo haploid induction in maize: Performance of new inducers and significance of doubled haploid lines in hybrid breeding. Maydica 50:275-284.
22. Robertson, A. 1960. A theory of limits in artificial selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 153:234-249.
23. Robertson, A. 1961. Inbreeding in artificial selection programmes. Genet. Res. 2:189-194.
24. Santiago, E., and A. Caballero. 1995. Effective size of populations under selection. Genetics 139:1013-1030.
25. Silvela, L., R. Rodgers, A. Barrera, and D.E. Alexander. 1989. Effect of selection intensity and population size on percent oil in maize, Zea mays L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 78:298-304.
26. Strahwald, J.F., and H.H. Geiger. 1988. Theoretical studies on the usefulness of doubled haploids for improving the efficiency of recurrent selection in spring barley. p. 1-13. In B.I. Honne (ed.) Proc. 7th Meeting of the EUCARPIA Section on Biometrics in Plant Breeding, Aas, Norway. 2-5 Aug. 1988. EUCARPIA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
27. Suwantaradon, K., and S.A. Eberhart. 1974. Developing hybrids from two improved maize populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 44:206-210.
28. Tomerius, A.M. 2001. Optimizing the development of seed-parent lines in hybrid rye breeding. Ph.D. diss. Univ. of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
29. Utz, H.F. 1969. Mehrstufenselektion in der Pflanzenzüchtung. (In German.) Ph.D. diss. Univ. of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
30. Walsh, B. 2004. Population- and quantitative-genetic models of selection limits. Plant Breed. Rev. 24(Pt. 1):177-225.
31. Weber, K. 2004. Population size and long-term selection. Plant Breed. Rev. 24(Pt. 1):249-268.
32. Wei, M., A. Caballero, and W.G. Hill. 1996. Selection response in finite populations. Genetics 144:1961-1974.
33. Williams, J.S. 1962. The evaluation of a selection index. Biometrics 18:375-393.
34. Wray, N.R., and R. Thompson. 1990. Prediction of rates of inbreeding in selected populations. Genet. Res. 55:41-54.