Partial cutting reduces species richness of fungi on woody debris in oak-rich forests

Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 38, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 1807-1816

  Nordén, Björn ^a   Götmark, Frank ^a   Ryberg, Martin ^a   Paltto, Heidi ^a   Allmér, Johan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; DEBRIS; FUNGI;

AFTER-TREATMENT; BASAL AREA (BA); BIO FUELS; CLOSED CANOPY (CC); COARSE WOODY DEBRIS (CWD); EUROPEAN; FINE WOODY DEBRIS (FWD); FRUITING BODIES; IN CONTROL; OAK-DOMINATED FORESTS; PARTIAL CUTTINGS; SPECIES COMPOSITIONS; SPECIES RICHNESS; WOODY DEBRIS (WD);

FORESTRY;

BIOFUEL; DECIDUOUS FOREST; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FUNGUS; HARVESTING; SPECIES RICHNESS; SUCCESSION; WOODY DEBRIS;

ANIMALS; BIODIVERSITY; FIBER DEBRIS; FORESTRY; FUNGI;

EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA; SWEDEN;

ASCOMYCOTA; BASIDIOMYCOTA; FUNGI; QUERCUS;

EID: 46849112499     PISSN: 00455067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/X08-031     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Bakker, E.S., Olff, H., Vandenberghe, C., De Maeyer, K., Smit, R., Gleichman, J.M., and Vera, F.W.M. 2004. Ecological anachronisms in the recruitment of temperate light-demanding tree species in wooded pastures. J. Appl. Ecol. 41: 571-582. doi:10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00908.x.
2. Berg, Å ., Ehnström, B., Gustafsson, L., Hallingbäck, T., Jonsell, M., and Weslien, J. 1994. Threatened plant, animal, and fungus species in Swedish forests, distribution and habitat associations. Conserv. Biol. 8: 718-731. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08030718.x.
3. Berglund, H., Edman, M., and Ericson, L. 2005. Temporal variation of wood-fungi diversity in boreal old-growth forests: implications for monitoring. Ecol. Appl. 15: 970-982. doi:10.1890/04-0628.
4. Blackwell, M., and Jones, K. 1997. Taxonomic diversity and interactions of insect-associated ascomycetes. Biodivers. Conserv. 6: 689-699. doi:10.1023/A:1018366203181.
5. ter Braak, C.J.F., and Smilauer, P. 2002. CANOCO Reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows, User's guide: Software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY.
6. Brown, N., Bhagwat, S., and Watkinson, S. 2006. Macrofungal diversity in fragmented and disturbed forests of the Western Ghats of India. J. Appl. Ecol. 43: 11-17. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01107.x.
7. Chen, J.Q., Franklin, J.F., and Spies, T.A. 1995. Growing-season microclimatic gradients from clear-cut edges into old-growth douglas-fir forests. Ecol. Appl. 5: 74-86. doi:10.2307/1942053.
8. Clark, J.A., and May, R.M. 2002. Taxonomic bias in conservation research. Science, 297: 191b-192. doi:10.1126/science.297.5579.191b. PMID:12117005.
9. Coleman, D.C., and Whitman, W.B. 2005. Linking species richness, biodiversity and ecosystem function in soil systems. Pedobiologica, 49: 479-497.
10. Colwell, R.K. 1997. EstimateS, Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples, version 5. User's guide and application published at: http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates.
11. Dagley, J., Warnock, B., and Read, H. 2001. Managing veteran trees in historic open places. The Corporation of London's perspective. Tools for preserving woodland biodiversity. NACONEX textbook 2. Edited by H. Read, A.S. Forfang, R. Marciau, H. Paltto, L. Andersson, and B. Tardy. Töreboda Tryckeri AB, Töreboda. pp. 28-31.
12. Dix, N.J., and Webster, J. 1995. Fungal ecology. Chapman and Hall, London.
13. Franc, N., and Götmark, F. 2007. Partial cutting favours saproxylic and herbivorous beetles in oak-rich conservation forests. In Conservation ecology of forest invertebrates, especially saproxylic beetles, in temperate successional oak-rich stands. Doctoral thesis, Department of Zoology, Göteborg University.
14. Fridman, J., and Walheim, M. 2000. Amount, structure and dynamics of dead wood on managed forestland in Sweden. For. Ecol. Manage. 131: 23-36. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00208-X.
15. Fung, P.Y.H., Kirschbaum, M.U.F., Raison, R.J., and Stucley, C. 2002. The potential for bioenergy production from Australian forests, its contribution to national greenhouse targets and recent developments in conversion processes. Biomass Bioenergy, 22: 223-236. doi:10.1016/S0961-9534(01)00069-1.
16. Gärdenfors, U. (Editor). 2005. Rödlistade arter i Sverige 2005 - The 2005 Red Listed of Swedish species. ArtDatabanken, Swedish University of Agricultural Science, Uppsala.
17. Gomez, D.M., Anthony, R.G., and Trappe, J.M. 2003. The influence of thinning on production of hypogeous fungus sporocarps in Douglas-fir forests in the northern Oregon Coast Range. Northwest Sci. 77: 308-319.
18. Gotelli, N.J., and Colwell, R.K. 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: Procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol. Lett. 4: 379-391. doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00230.x.
19. Götmark, F. 2007. Careful partial harvesting in conservation stands and retention of large oaks favour oak regeneration. Biol. Conserv. 140: 349-358. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2007.08.018.
20. Götmark, F., Paltto, H., Nordén, B., and Götmark, E. 2005. Evaluating partial cutting in broadleaved temperate forest under strong experimental control: short-term effects on herbaceous plants. For. Ecol. Manage. 214: 124-141. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2005.03.052.
21. Groom, M.J., Meffe, G.K., and Carroll, R.C. 2005. Principles of conservation biology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
22. Hannah, L., Carr, J.L., and Lankerani, A. 1995. Human disturbance and natural habitat: a biome level analysis of a global data set. Biodivers. Conserv. 4: 128-155. doi:10.1007/BF00137781.
23. Hansen, L., and Knudsen, H. (Editors). 1997. Nordic macromycetes. Vol. 3. Heterobasidioid, aphyllophoroid and gastermomycetoid basidiomycetes. Nordsvamp, Copenhagen.
24. Hansen, L., and Knudsen, H. (Editors). 2000. Nordic macromycetes. Vol. 1. Ascomycetes. Nordsvamp, Copenhagen.
25. Hansson, L. 2001. Traditional management of forests: plant and bird community responses to alternative restoration of oak-hazel woodland in Sweden. Biodivers. Conserv. 10: 1865-1873. doi:10.1023/A:1013125611492.
26. Hughes, J.B., Hellmann, J.J., Ricketts, T.H., and Bohannan, B.J.M. 2001. Counting the uncountable: statistical approaches to estimating microbial diversity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67: 4399-4406. doi:10.1128/AEM.67. 10.4399-4406.2001. PMID:11571135.
27. Johansson, T. 2000. Regenerating Norway spruce under the shelter of birch on good sites might increase the biofuel supply in Sweden. N. Z. J. For. Sci. 30: 16-28.
28. Johannesson, H., and Stenlid, J. 1999. Molecular identification of wood-inhabiting fungi in unmanaged Picea abies forest in Sweden. For. Ecol. Manage. 115: 203-211. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00399-5.
29. Junninen, K., Penttilä, R., and Martikainen, P. 2007. Fallen retention aspen trees on clear-cuts can be important habitats for redlisted polypores: a case study in Finland. Biodivers. Conserv. 16: 475-490. doi:10.1007/s10531-005-6227-6.
30. Junninen, K., Similä, M., Kouki, J., and Kotiranta, H. 2006. Assemblages of wood-inhabiting fungi along gradients of succession and naturalness in boreal pine-dominated forests in Fennoscandia. Ecography, 29: 75-83. doi:10.1111/j.2005.0906-7590.04358.x.
31. Kittredge, D.B., Finley, A.O., and Foster, D.R. 2003. Timber harvesting as ongoing disturbance in a landscape of diverse ownership. For. Ecol. Manage. 180: 425-442. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00561-3.
32. Kõljalg, U., Dahlberg, A., Taylor, A.F.S., Larsson, E., Hallenberg, N., Stenlid, J., Larsson, K.H., Fransson, P.M., Karen, O., and Jonsson, L. 2000. Diversity and abundance of resupinate thelephoroid fungi as ectomycorrhizal symbionts in Swedish boreal forests. Mol. Ecol. 9: 1985-1996. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.2000.01105.x. PMID:11123611.
33. Kõljalg, U., Larsson, K.H., Abarenkov, K., Nilsson, R.H., Alexander, I.J., Eberhardt, U., Erland, S., Høiland, K., Kjøller, R., Larsson, E., Pennanen, T., Sen, R., Taylor, A.F.S., Tedersoo, L., Vrålstad, T., and Ursing, B.M. 2005. UNITE: a database providing web-based methods for the molecular identification of ectomycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 166: 1063-1068. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01376.x. PMID:15869663.
34. Kranabetter, J.M., and Kroeger, P. 2001. Ectomycorrhizal mushroom response to partial cutting in a western hemlock - western redcedar forest. Can. J. For. Res. 31: 978-987. doi:10.1139/cjfr-31-6-978.
35. Lindner, D.L., Burdsall, H.H., and Stanosz, G.R. 2006. Species diversity of polyporoid and corticioid fungi in northern hardwood forests with differing management histories. Mycologia, 98: 195-217. PMID:16894965.
36. Lins, C. 2004. Renewable energy share by 2020 - the RE industry point of view European Renewable Energy Council GREEN-X conference, Brussels, 23rd September 2004. European Renewable Energy Council, Brussels.
37. Luoma, D.L., Eberhart, J.L., Molina, R., and Amaranthus, M.P. 2004. Response of ectomycorrhizal fungus sporocarp production to varying levels and patterns of green-tree retention. For. Ecol. Manage. 202: 337-354. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2004.07.041.
38. Malinen, J., Pesonen, M., Maatta, T., and Kajanus, M. 2001. Potential harvest for wood fuels (energy wood) from logging residues and first thinnings in Southern Finland. Biomass Bioenergy, 20: 189-196. doi:10.1016/S0961- 9534(00)00075-1.
39. Moore, D., Nauta, M.M., Evans, S.E., and Rotheroe, M. (Editors). 2001. Fungal conservation issues and solutions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
40. Mueller, G.M., Bills, G.F., and Foster, M.S., (Editors). 2004. Biodiversity of fungi - Inventory and monitoring methods. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam.
41. National Board of Forestry. 1999. Nyckelbiotopsinventeringen 1993-1998. Slutrapport. Tabergs Tryckeri AB. Skogsstyrelsen, Jönköping. [In Swedish].
42. Image Home Page, N.I.H. (2007). NIH Image. At http://rsb.info. nih.gov/nih-image/ (Feb 2008).
43. Nilsson, S.G. 1997. Forests in the temperate-boreal transition: natural and man-made features. Ecol. Bull. 46: 61-70.
44. Nilsson, S.G., Hedin, J., and Niklasson, M. 2001. Biodiversity and its assessment in boreal and nemoral forests. Scand. J. For. Res. 3 (Suppl.): 10-26.
45. Nordén, B., Appelqvist, T., Lindahl, B., and Henningsson, M. 1999. Cubic rot fungi-succession of corticioid fungi in brown-rotted spruce stumps. Mycol. Helv. 10: 13-24.
46. Nordén, B., Götmark, F., Tönnberg, M., and Ryberg, M. 2004a. Dead wood in semi-natural temperate broadleaved woodland: contribution of coarse and fine dead wood, attached dead wood and stumps. For. Ecol. Manage. 194: 235-248. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2004.02.043.
47. Nordén, B., Ryberg, M., Götmark, F., and Olausson, B. 2004b. Relative importance of coarse and fine woody debris for the diversity of wood-inhabiting fungi in temperate broadleaved forest. Biol. Conserv. 117: 1-10. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00235-0.
48. Økland, B., Götmark, F., Nordén, B., Franc, N., Kurina, O., and Polevoi, A. 2005. Regional diversity of Mycetophilids (Diptera: Sciaroidea) in Scandinavian oak-dominated forests. Biol. Conserv. 121: 9-20. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2004.04.005.
49. Økland, B., Götmark, F., and Nordén, B. 2008. Oak woodland restoration: testing the effects on biodiversity of mycetophilids in Sweden. Biodivers. Conserv. 17. doi:10.1007/s10531-008-9325-4.
50. Peterken, G.F. 1996. Natural woodland - Ecology and conservation in northern temperate regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
51. Polagye, B.L., Hodgson, K.T., and Malte, P.C. 2007. An economic analysis of bio-energy options using thinnings from overstocked forests. Biomass Bioenergy, 31: 105-125. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2006.02.005.
52. Rackham, O. 1998. Implications of historical ecology for conservation. In Conservation science and action. Edited by W.J. Sutherland. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford. pp. 152-175.
53. Ranius, T., and Jansson, N. 2000. The influence of forest regrowth, original canopy cover and tree size on wood-inhabiting beetles associated with old oaks. Biol. Conserv. 95: 85-94. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00007-0.
54. Rayner, A.D.M., and Boddy, L. 1997. Fungal decomposition of wood: Its biology and ecology. Bath Press, Bath.
55. Rubino, D.L., and McCarthy, B.C. 2003. Composition and ecology of macrofungal and myxomycete communities on oak woody debris in a mixed-oak forest of Ohio. Can. J. For. Res. 33: 2151-2163. doi:10.1139/x03-137.
56. Schuler, T.M. 2004. Fifty years of partial harvesting in a mixed mesophytic forest: composition and productivity. Can. J. For. Res. 34: 985-997. doi:10.1139/x03-262.
57. Siitonen, J. 2001. Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: Fennoscandian boreal forests as an example. In Ecology of woody debris in boreal forests. Edited by B.G. Jonsson and N. Kruys. Ecol. Bull. 49: 11-41.
58. Siitonen, P., Lehtinen, A., and Siitonen, M. 2005. Effects of forest edges on the distribution, abundance, and regional persistence of wood-rotting fungi. Conserv. Biol. 19: 250-260. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00232.x.
59. Smith, J.E., Mckay, D., Brenner, G., Mciver, J., and Spatafora, J.W. 2005. Early impacts of forest restoration treatments on the ectomycorrhizal fungal community and fine root biomass in a mixed conifer forest. J. Appl. Ecol. 42: 526-535. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01047.x.
60. Svenning, J.C. 2002. A review of natural vegetation openness in north-western Europe. Biol. Conserv. 104: 133-148. doi:10. 1016/S0006-3207(01)00162-8.
61. Vera, F.W.M. 2000. Grazing ecology and forest history. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.
62. Wilding, N., Collins, N.M., Hammond, P.M., and Webber, J.F. 1989. Insect-fungus interactions. Academic Press, London.