Continuous SPA: Continuous assessing and monitoring software process

Proceedings - 2007 IEEE Congress on Services, SERVICES 2007

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 153-158

  Chen, Xian ^a   Sorenson, Paul ^a   Willson, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MANAGEMENT; MEDICAL IMAGING; MONITORING; PROCESS MONITORING; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; SOFTWARE PROTOTYPING; STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL;

(E ,3E) PROCESS; AND REAL TIME; ASSESSMENT APPROACHES; CONFIGURABLE; CURRENT STATUS; GLOBAL MANAGEMENT; IN PROCESS; MONITOR (CO); SOFTWARE PROCESS MANAGEMENT; SOFTWARE PROCESS QUALITY; SOFTWARE PROCESSING; WEB-BASED PROTOTYPE;

PROCESS ENGINEERING;

EID: 46849086175     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/SERVICES.2007.25     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. V. Basili, G. Caldiera, and H. Rombach. Goal Question Metric Approach. In Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, volume 1, pages 528-532. J. J. Marciniak, Ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1994.
2. A. Birk, J. Järvinen, S. Komi-Sirviö, P. Kuvaja, M. Oivo, and D. Pfahl. PROFES - A Product Driven Process Improvement Methodology. In the Proceedings of Software Process Improvement 1998 (SPI98), Monte Carlo, Monaco, December 1998.
3. CMMI. CMMI-SE/SW, V1.0 Capability Maturity Model® - Integrated for System Engineering/Software Engineering, Version 1.0 Continuous Representation. Technical Report CMU/SEI-2000-TR-019, Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, PA., 2000.
4. CMMI. CMMI-SE/SW, V1.1 Capability Maturity Model® - Integrated for System Engineering/Software Engineering, Version 1.1 Continuous Representation. Technical Report CMU/SEI-2002-TR-028, Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, PA., 2002.
5. P Consortium. The PROFES User Manual. Fraunhofer IRB Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany, 2000.
6. W. E. Deming. Out of the Crisis: Quality, Productivity and Competitive Position. Technical report, MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study, Cambridge. Mass., 1986.
7. A. Dorling and P Simms. Study Report: The Need and Requirements for a Software Process Assessment Standard. Technical report, International Standards Organization, 1992.
8. W. Humphrey. Competing in the software age. Technical report, Software Engineering Institute, 1999.
9. ISO/IEC-15504. Information Technology - Process Assessment. Technical report, International Organization for Standardization (Ed.), 2003.
10. ISO/TEC TR-15504. Information Technology - Software Process Assessment. Technical report, International Organization for Standardization (Ed.), 1998.
11. J. Järvinen, D. Hamann, and R. v. Solingen. On Integrating Assessment and Measurement: Towards Continuous Assessment of Software Engineering Processes. In the Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE '99), pages 83-87, Kaiserslautern, Germany, June 1999.
12. J. Järvinen and S. R. van. Establishing Continuous Assessment Using Measurements. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Product Focused Software Process Improvement (PROFES'99), Oulu, Finland, June 22-24 1999.
13. P Kuvaja. Bootstrap 3.0 - A SPICE Conformant Software Process Assessment Methodology. Software Quality Journal, 8:7-19, 1999.
14. P Kuvaja, J. Similä, L. Krzanik, A. Bicego, S. Saukkonen, and G. Koch. Software Process Assessment & Improvement - The BOOTSTRAP Approach. Technical report, Oxford, UK., 1994.
15. U. of Alberta. AIS Project Charter Template, 2005.
16. U. of Alberta. AIS Methodology Overview, 2007.
17. T. P Rout. ISO/IEC15504 - Evolution to an International Standard. Software Process Improvement and Practice, 8:27-40, 2003.