Dynamic riparian buffer widths from potential non-point source pollution areas in forested watersheds

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 256, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 664-673

  Gorsevski, Pece V ^a   Boll, Jan ^b   Gomezdelcampo, Enrique ^a   Brooks, Erin S ^b  

^a BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

Author keywords

Buffer width; GIS; Non point source pollution; Variable source areas; Water quality

Indexed keywords

CATCHMENTS; DYNAMIC MODELS; LAND USE; RUNOFF; WATER CONSERVATION; WATER QUALITY;

(R ,S ,S) POLICY; APPLIED (CO); CASE STUDIES; DIFFUSE SOURCES; DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING; FORESTED WATERSHEDS; NATIONAL FORESTS; NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTION (NPSP); NON-POINT-SOURCE (NPS); OVERLAND FLOW; RIPARIAN BUFFERS; TEMPORAL DYNAMICS; WO OD PRODUCTION;

HYDRAULIC MODELS;

DECISION MAKING; ELEVATION; FOREST MANAGEMENT; MODELING; NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION; POLLUTANT TRANSPORT; RIPARIAN ZONE; RUNOFF; SEASONAL VARIATION; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHED;

IDAHO; NORTH AMERICA; PETE KING CREEK; UNITED STATES;

EID: 46849084371     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.05.019     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Agnew L.J., Lyon S., Gérard-Marchant P., Collins V.B., Lembo A.J., Steenhuis T.S., and Walter M.T. Identifying hydrologically sensitive areas: bridging the gap between science and application. J. Environ. Manage. 78 1 (2006) 63-76
2. Beven K.J. Rainfall-Runoff Modeling: The Primer (2001), John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, England
3. Beven K., and Kirkby M.J. A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrol. Sci. Bull. 24 (1979) 43-69
4. Boll, J., Brooks, E.S., Campbell, C.R., Stockle, C.O., Young, S.K., Hammel, J.E., McDaniel, P.A., 1998. Progress toward development of a GIS based water quality management tool for small rural watersheds: modification and application of a distributed model. Presented at the 1998 ASAE Annual International Meeting in Orlando, Florida, July 12-16, Paper 982230, ASAE, 2950 Niles Road, St. Joseph, MI, USA.
5. Boll J., Brooks E.S., Steenhuis T.S., Walter M.F., Walter M.T., and Weiler K. Hydrologically sensitive areas: variable source area hydrology implications for water quality risk assessment. J. Soil. Water. Conserv. 55 3 (2000) 277-284
6. Bresler E., Russo D., and Miller R.D. Rapid estimate of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity function. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 42 (1978) 170-172
7. Brooks, E.S., 2003. Distributed hydrologic modeling of the eastern Palouse. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Idaho, Moscow, USA.
8. Brooks E.S., Boll J., and McDaniel P.A. Distributed and integrated response of a geographic information system-based hydrologic model in the eastern Palouse region, Idaho. Hydrol. Process. 21 (2007) 110-122
9. Burrough P.A., and McDonnell R.A. Principles of Geographic Information Systems (1998), Oxford University Press, Oxford
10. Coke H.L., Renaud J.-P., Claxton A.J., McDonnell J.J., Andrerson M.G., Blake J.R., and Bates P.D. The effect of model configuration on modeled hillslope-riparian interactions. J. Hydrol. 279 (2003) 167-181
11. Dietrich W.E., Reiss R., Hsu M.L., and Montgomery D.R. A process-based model for colluvial soil depth and shallow landsliding using digital elevation data. Hydrol. Process. 9 (1995) 383-400
12. Dunne T., and Black R.D. Partial area contributions to storm runoff in a small New England watershed. Water Resour. Res. 6 (1970) 1296-1311
13. Flanagan, D.C., Livingston, S.J. (Eds.), 1995. WEPP user summary. NSERL Report No. 11, W. Lafayette, IN, National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory.
14. Frankenberger J.R., Brooks E.S., Walter M.T., Walter M.F., and Steenhuis T.S. A GIS-based variable source area hydrology model. Hydrol. Process. 13 (1999) 804-822
15. Forest Service Clearwater National Forest F.-C. Land System Inventory (1983), Forest Service Clearwater National Forest, Orofino, ID
16. Gessler P.E., Moore I.D., McKenzie N.J., and Ryan P.J. Soil-landscape modelling and spatial prediction of soil attributes. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Syst. 9 (1995) 421-432
17. Gessler P.E., Chadwick O.A., Chamran F., Althouse L., and Holmes K. Modeling soil-landscape and ecosystem properties using terrain attributes. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64 (2000) 2046-2056
18. Gorsevski P.V., Gessler P.E., Boll J., Elliot W.J., and Foltz R.B. Spatially and temporally distributed modeling of landslide susceptibility. Geomorphology 80 3/4 (2006) 178-198
19. Grayson R.B., Moore I.D., and McMahon T.A. Physically based hydrologic modeling 1. A terrain-based model for investigative purposes. Water Resour. Res. 28 (1992) 2639-2658
20. Grayson R.B., Moore I.D., and McMahon T.A. Physically based hydrologic modeling 2. Is the concept realistic?. Water Resour. Res. 28 (1992) 2659-2666
21. Hammond, C., Hall, D., Miller, S., Swetik, P., 1992. Level I Stability Analyses (LISA) documentation for version 2.0. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-285, Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, 190.
22. Hickey R. Evaluating the WATBAL sediment loading model, Clearwater National Forest, Idaho. Northwest Sci. 71 (1997) 233-242
23. Hunsaker C.T., and Levine D.A. Hierarchical approaches to the study of water quality in rivers. Bioscience 45 3 (1995) 193-203
24. Malczewski J. GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis (1999), John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY
25. Moore I.D., Grayson R.B., and Ladson A.R. Digital terrain modelling-a review of hydrological, geomorphological and biological applications. Hydrol. Process. 5 (1991) 3-30
26. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 2001. Climatological Data, Idaho, Fenn Ranger Station. Accessed November 20, 2001, http://www.noaa.gov/.
27. O'Loughlin E.M. Prediction of surface saturation zones in natural catchments by topographic analysis. Water Resour. Res. 22 (1986) 794-804
28. Quinn P., Beven K.J., Chevallier P., and Planchon O. The prediction of hillslope flow paths for distributing hydrological modelling using digital terrain models. Hydrol. Process. 5 (1991) 59-79
29. Saaty T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (1998), McGraw-Hill, New York
30. Saxton K.E., Rawls W.J., Romberger J.S., and Papendick R.I. Estimating generalized soil-water characteristics from texture. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50 (1986) 1031-1036
31. Thornthwaite C.W., and Mather J.R. The Water Balance (1955), Laboratory of Climatology, Publ. No. 8, Centerton, NJ
32. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1960. Engineering and Design: Runoff from Snowmelt. EM 1110-2-1406.
33. U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), 2001. Soil Survey Geographic Database (SSURGO), Kooskia Area, Idaho County, ID. Accessed November 7, 2001, http://www.ftw.nrcs.usda.gov/stssaid.html.
34. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1992. National Water Quality Inventory: 1990 Report to Congress. Office of Water. EPA 503/99-92-006.
35. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1997. Non-point pointer No. 7: Fact Sheet. EPA841-F-S-00-001.
36. Walter M.T., Walter M.F., Brooks E.S., Steenhuis T.S., Boll J., and Weiler K. Hydrologically sensitive areas: variable source area hydrology implications for water quality risk assessment. J. Soil Water Conserv. 3 (2000) 277-284
37. Wigmosta M.S., Vail L.W., and Lettenmaier D.P. A distributed hydrology-vegetation model for complex terrain. Water Resour. Res. 3 (1994) 1642-1665