Intra-instrument reliability of 4 goniometers

Journal of Chiropractic Medicine

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 91-95

  Pringle, R Kevin ^a  

^a Kelsey Seybold Clinic   (United States)

Author keywords

Cervical Spine; Goniometers; ROM

Indexed keywords

EID: 46749144696     PISSN: 15563707     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60051-2     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Youdas J.W., Carey J.R., and Garrett T.R. Reliability of measurements of cervical spine ROM-comparison of three methods. Phys Ther 71 (1991) 98-104
2. Alaranta H., Hurri H., Heliovaara M., Soukka A., and Harju R. Flexibility of the spine: normative values of goniometric and tape measurements. Scand J Rehabil Med 26 (1994) 147-154
3. Tucci S.M., Hicks J.E., Gross E.G., Campbell W., and Danoff J. Cervical motion assessment a new, simple and accurate method. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 67 (1986) 225-230
4. Dvorak J., Panjabi M.M., Novotny J.E., and Atinnes J.A. In vivo Flexion/extension of the normal cervical spine. J Orthop Res 9 (1991) 828-834
5. Ordway N.R., Seymour R., Donselson R.G., Hojnowski L., Lee E., and Edwards W.T. Cervical spine sagittal range-of-motion analysis using three methods. Cervical range-of-motion device, 3space and radiography. Spine 22 (1997) 501-508
6. Morgan J.P., Miyabayashi T., and Choy S. Cervical spine motion: radiographic study. Am J Vet Res 47 (1986) 2165-2169
7. Holmes A., Wang C., Han Z.H., and Dang G.T. The range and nature of flexionextension motion in the cervical spine. Spine 19 (1994) 2505-2510
8. Van Mameren H., Drukker J., Sanches H., and Beursgens J. Cervical spine motion in the sagittal plane (I) ROM of actually performed movements, an X-ray cinematographic study. Eur J Morphol 28 (1990) 47-68
9. Lim T.H., Eck J.C., An H.S., McGrady L.M., Harris G.F., and Haughton V.M. A noninvasive, three-dimensional spinal motion analysis method. Spine 22 (1997) 1996-2000
10. Christensen H.W., and Nilsson N. The reliability of measuring active and passive cervical ROM: an observer-blinded and randomized repeated-measures design. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 21 (1998) 341-347
11. Roozmon P., Gravovetsky S.A., Gouw G.J., and Newman N. Examining motion in the cervical spine II: Characterization of coupled joint motion using an opto-electronic device to track skin markers. J Biomed Eng 15 (1993) 13-22
12. rd Edition Revised, 1990. American Medical Association, Milwaukee, WI
13. Fitz-Ritson D. Phasic exercises for cervical rehabilitation after "whiplash" trauma. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 18 (1995) 21-24
14. Askins V., and Eismont F.J. Efficacy of five cervical orthoses in restricting cervical motion: A comparative study. Spine 22 (1997) 1193-1198
15. Nilsson N., Christensen H.W., and Hartvigsen J. Lasting changes in passive ROM after spinal manipulation: a randomized, blind, controlled trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 19 (1996) 165-168
16. Dvorak J., Antinnes J.A., Panjabi M., Loustalot D., and Bonomo M. Age and gender related mormal motin of the cervical spine. Spine 17 (1992) S393-S398
17. Youdas J.W., Garrett T.R., Suman V.J., Bogard C.L., Hallman H.O., and Carey J.R. Normal ROM of the cervical spine: an initial goniometric study. Phys Ther 72 (1992) 770-780
18. Lind B., Sihlbom H., Nordwall A., and Malchau H. Normal ROM of the cervical spine. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 70 (1988) 692-695