-
1
-
-
12944287801
-
Why environmental scientists are becoming Bayesians
-
Clark, J. S. 2005. Why environmental scientists are becoming Bayesians. Ecology Letters 8:2-14.
-
(2005)
Ecology Letters
, vol.8
, pp. 2-14
-
-
Clark, J.S.1
-
2
-
-
0030441712
-
A novel Bayesian approach to assessing impacts of rain forest logging
-
Crome, F. H. J., M. R. Thomas, and L. A. Moore. 1996. A novel Bayesian approach to assessing impacts of rain forest logging. Ecological Applications 6:1104-1123.
-
(1996)
Ecological Applications
, vol.6
, pp. 1104-1123
-
-
Crome, F.H.J.1
Thomas, M.R.2
Moore, L.A.3
-
3
-
-
21744461215
-
A statistical test to show negligible trend
-
Dixon. P. M., and J. H. K. Pechmann. 2005. A statistical test to show negligible trend. Ecology 86:1751-1756.
-
(2005)
Ecology
, vol.86
, pp. 1751-1756
-
-
Dixon, P.M.1
Pechmann, J.H.K.2
-
4
-
-
0010867715
-
Comment: The first data analysis should be journalistic
-
Edwards. D. 1996. Comment: The first data analysis should be journalistic. Ecological Applications 6:1090-1094.
-
(1996)
Ecological Applications
, vol.6
, pp. 1090-1094
-
-
Edwards, D.1
-
5
-
-
2542636541
-
Bayesian inference in ecology
-
Ellison, A. M. 2004. Bayesian inference in ecology. Ecology Letters 7:509-520.
-
(2004)
Ecology Letters
, vol.7
, pp. 509-520
-
-
Ellison, A.M.1
-
6
-
-
33645105391
-
Alternatives to statistical hypothesis testing in ecology: A guide to self teaching
-
Hobbs, N. T., and R. Hilborn. 2006. Alternatives to statistical hypothesis testing in ecology: a guide to self teaching. Ecological Applications 16:5-19.
-
(2006)
Ecological Applications
, vol.16
, pp. 5-19
-
-
Hobbs, N.T.1
Hilborn, R.2
-
7
-
-
0032808670
-
The insignificance of statistical significance testing
-
Johnson, D. H. 1999. The insignificance of statistical significance testing. Journal of Wildlife Management 63:763-772.
-
(1999)
Journal of Wildlife Management
, vol.63
, pp. 763-772
-
-
Johnson, D.H.1
-
9
-
-
18844448186
-
Equivalence tests can enhance environmental science and management
-
McBride, G. B. 1999. Equivalence tests can enhance environmental science and management. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics 41:19-29.
-
(1999)
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics
, vol.41
, pp. 19-29
-
-
McBride, G.B.1
-
10
-
-
35148880381
-
Is statistical power to detect trends a good assessment of population monitoring?
-
Seavy, N. E., and M. H. Reynolds. 2007. Is statistical power to detect trends a good assessment of population monitoring? Biological Conservation 140:187-191.
-
(2007)
Biological Conservation
, vol.140
, pp. 187-191
-
-
Seavy, N.E.1
Reynolds, M.H.2
-
11
-
-
33644661144
-
-
version 1.4 user manual. Medical Research Council Biostatistics Unit, London, UK
-
Spiegelhalter, D. J., A. Thomas, N. G. Best, and D. Lunn. 2003. WinBUGS version 1.4 user manual. Medical Research Council Biostatistics Unit, London, UK.
-
(2003)
WinBUGS
-
-
Spiegelhalter, D.J.1
Thomas, A.2
Best, N.G.3
Lunn, D.4
-
12
-
-
0030404255
-
Monitoring long-term population change: Why are there so many analysis methods?
-
Thomas, L. 1996. Monitoring long-term population change: why are there so many analysis methods? Ecology 77:49-58.
-
(1996)
Ecology
, vol.77
, pp. 49-58
-
-
Thomas, L.1
-
13
-
-
0003895851
-
-
fourth edition. Springer, New York, New York, USA
-
Venablcs, W. N., and B. D. Ripley. 2002. Modern applied statistics with S. fourth edition. Springer, New York, New York, USA.
-
(2002)
Modern applied statistics with S
-
-
Venablcs, W.N.1
Ripley, B.D.2
-
14
-
-
0033777050
-
Bayesian methods in conservation biology
-
Wade, P. R. 2000. Bayesian methods in conservation biology. Conservation Biology 14:1308-1316.
-
(2000)
Conservation Biology
, vol.14
, pp. 1308-1316
-
-
Wade, P.R.1
|