Ethical implications of modifying lethal injection protocols

PLoS Medicine

Volumn 5, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 0845-0849

  Koniaris, Leonidas G ^a   Goodman, Kenneth W ^a   Sugarman, Jeremy ^b,c   Ozomaro, Uzoezi ^a   Sheldon, Jonathan ^d   Zimmers, Teresa A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COURT; ETHICS; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INJECTION; LAW; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRISONER; PUNISHMENT; REVIEW; UNITED STATES; ARTICLE; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; JURISPRUDENCE; LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICAL ETHICS; METHODOLOGY;

CAPITAL PUNISHMENT; ETHICS, MEDICAL; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HUMANS; INJECTIONS, INTRAVENOUS; PRISONERS; SUPREME COURT DECISIONS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 46749102924     PISSN: 15491277     EISSN: 15491676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050126     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. (2008) Baze v. Rees, 128 S. Ct. 1520, 1532, 1548, 1568.
2. Denno D (2002) When legislatures delegate death: The troubling paradox behind state uses of electrocution and lethal injection and what it says about us. Ohio State Law J 63: 63-260. Available: http://papers.ssm.com/sol3/ papers. cfm?abstract_id=319340. Accessed 5 May 2008.
3. Denno DW (2007) The lethal injection quandary: How medicine has dismantled the death penalty. Fordham Legal Studies Research Paper No. 983732. Available: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=983732. Accessed 5 May 2008.
4. Death Penalty Information Center (2008) Searchable database of executions. Available: http://www. deathpenaltyinfo.org/executions. php. Accessed 5 May 2008.
5. Fellner J, Tofte S (2006) So long as they die: Lethal injection in the United States. Human Rights Watch. Available: http://hrw.org/reports/2006/ us0406/ . Accessed 5 May 2008.
6. Koniaris LG, Zimmers TA, Lubarsky DA, Sheldon JP (2005) Inadequate anaesthesia in lethal injection for execution. Lancet 365: 1412-1414.
7. Weisman RS, Bernstein JN (2005) Inadequate anaesthesia in lethal injection for execution. Lancet 366: 1074; author reply 1074-1076.
8. Zimmers TA, Sheldon J, Lubarsky DA, López-Muñoz F, Waterman L, et al. (2007) Lethal injection for execution: Chemical asphyxiation? PLoS Med4: e156 doi:10.1371/journal pmed.0040156
9. Koniaris LG, Sheldon JP, Zimmers TA (2007) Can lethal injection for execution really be "fixed"? Lancet 369: 352-353.
10. Tuohy L (2005) Ross autopsy stirs execution debate. Hartford Courant. Available: http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/courant/access/880781791.html?dids= 880781791:880781791&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type= current&date=Aug+l 1 %2C+2005&author= LYNNE+TUOHY&pub=Hartford+Courant& edition=&startpage=A.l&desc=ROSS+ AUTOPSY+STIRS+EXECUTION+DEBATE+. Accessed 5 May 2008.
11. Liptak A, Aguayo T (2006) After problem execution, Governor Bush suspends the death penalty in Florida. The New York Times. Available: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A07E2D81231F935A25751 C1A9609C8B63. Accessed 5 May 2008.
12. Kennedy J, Bell M (2006) Bush halts executions to review procedure: Florida prison staff inserted the killer's needles poorly, a preliminary autopsy finds. Orlando Sentinel.
13. Dworkin G (2003) Lethal injection, autonomy, and the proper ends of medicine: A esponse to David Silver. Bioethics 17: 212-214.
14. Liang BA (2006) Special doctor's docket. Lethal injection: policy considerations for medicine. J Clin Anesth 18: 466-470.
15. United States Department of Health and Human Services (2005) Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects (the "Common Rule"). Available: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm. Accessed 8 May 2008.
16. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Lethal Injection Protocol Review Team (2007) State of California lethal injection protocol review. Available: http://www.cdcr.ca.gov/News/2007_Press_Releases/docs/ ReportToCourt.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2008.
17. United States Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons (2007) Execution protocol training agenda, April 17, 2007. Federal Correctional Complex Terre Haute.
18. Lynn J, Baily MA, Bottrell M Jennings B, Levine RJ, et al. (2007) The ethics of using quality improvement methods in health care. Ann Intern Med 146: 666-673.
19. Baily MA, Bottrell M, Lynn J, Jennings B, Hastings C (2006) The ethics of using QI methods to improve health care quality and safety. Hastings Cent Rep 36: S1-S40.
20. Truog RD, Brennan TA (1993) Participation of physicians in capital punishment. N Engl J Med 329: 1346-1350.
21. Zimmers TA, Lubarsky DA (2007) Physician participation in lethal injection executions. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 20: 147-151.
22. Gawande A (2006) When law and ethics collide - Why physicians participate in executions. N Engl J Med 354: 1221-1229.
23. Tennessee Department of Correction (2007) Report on administration of death sentences in Tennessee. Available: http://www.tennessean.com/assets/pdf/ DN71684430.PDF. Accessed 5 May 2008.
24. Florida Governor's Commission on Administration of Lethal Injection (2007) Final report with findings and recommendations. Available: http://sentencing.nj.gov/downloads/pdf/articles/2007/Apr2007/document08.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2008.
25. (1990) White v. Napoleon, 897 F.2d 103 (3d Cir. 1990). Available: http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/cases/prisons/white_v_napoleon.htm. Accessed 5 May 2008.
26. Committee on Ethical Considerations for Revisions to DHHS Regulations for Protection of Prisoners Involved in Research (2006) Ethical considerations for research involving prisoners. National Academies Press. Available: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11692. Accessed 5 May 2008.
27. Schwartz J (2007) Oversite of human subject research: The role of the states (research involving human participants V2). Online Ethics Center at the National Academy of Engineering. Available: http://www.onlineethics.diamax.com/ CMS/research/resref/nbacindex/nbachindex/hschwartz.aspx. Accessed 5 May 2008.
28. Shah SK (2008) How lethal injection reform constitutes impermissible research on prisoners. Am Crim Law Rev 45.
29. Arizona State Legislature (2005) Prisoner participation in medical research and plasmapheresis and whole blood programs. Arizona Statutes 31-321 to 31-323. Available: http://www.azleg.gov/ArizonaRevisedStatutes. asp?Title=31. Accessed 5 May 2008.
30. Oregon State Legislature (2007) Experimentation on inmates prohibited; inmate's right to judicial restraint of violation; action for damages. Oregon Statutes 421.085(2) and 421.085(1). Available: http://www.leg.state.or.us/ors/ 421.html. Accessed 5 May 2008.
31. California State Legislature (2007) Biomedical and behavioral research: General provisions and prohibitions. California Penal Code 3502 and 3502.5. Available: http://law.justia.com/california/codes/pen/3501-3509.5.html. Accessed 5 May 2008.
32. Virginia General Assembly (2007) Criminal justice and corrections: Regulations for human subject research. Virginia Administrative Code Title 6, 15-26-30C. Available: http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe? 000+reg+6VAC15-26-30. Accessed 5 May 2008.
33. United States District Court, Northern. District of California (2006) Exhibit A to Motion for TRO, Morales v. Hickman. Case Number 6-219. San Quentin. Operational Procedure No. 770.
34. United States District Court, Northern District of California (2006) Memorandum of intended decision; Request for response from defendants, Morales v. Tilton. Case Number C 06-219, C 06-926. Available: http://www.hrw.org/us/ morales121506.pdf Accessed 5 May 2008.
35. Florida Department of Corrections (2007) Florida lethal injection protocol to use after August 16, 2006. Exhibit A. February 15, 2007. Tallahassee, FL. Available: http://lethal-injection-florida.blogspot.com/2007/ 02/florida-lethal-injecfion-protocol-to.html. Accessed 5 May 2008.
36. United States Disuict Court, Eastern Disuict of North Carolina (2005) Second Heath Affidavit, Page v. Beck. Case Number 4-04. Document Number 102-
37. United States District Court, Eastern District of North Carolina (2004) Affidavit of Dershwitz, Perkins v. Beck. Case Number 04-643. Document Number 7, pp. 22-31.
38. United States District Court, Eastern District of North Carolina (2005) Polk Deposition, Page v. Beck. Case Number 5:04-ct-4. Document Number 98.
39. Steinbrook R (2006) New technology, old dilemma - Monitoring EEG activity during executions. N Engl J Med 354: 2525-2527.
40. Weigl A (2007) Doc's execution role: «Be presents» The News & Observer. Available: http://www.newsobserver.com/1509/story/559110.html. Accessed 5 May 2008.
41. North Carolina Office of Administrative Hearings (2007) Conner et al. v. North Carolina Council of State, 07 Gov. 0238 & 0264 at 6.
42. United States District Court, Eastern District of North Carolina (2006) Final Order; Brown v. Beck. Case Number 5:06-CT-3018-H. Available: http://www.law.fsu.edu/library/blogdocs/williebrown.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2008.
43. Heath MJ, Stanski DR, Pounder DJ (2005) Inadequate anaesthesia in lethal injection for execution. Lancet 366: 1073-1074; author reply 1074-1076.
44. Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals (2006) Order denying request for stay of execution and setting execution date, Malicoat v. State. Case Number D-1998-151. Available: http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument. asp?CiteID=446506. Accessed 5 May 2008.
45. (2007) Response from the Office of General Counsel, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, dated November 5, 2007, to an Open Records Request by Jon Sheldon, dated October 10,2007.