Household technology adoption, use, and impacts: Past, present, and future

Information Systems Frontiers

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 397-402

  Brown, Susan A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Adoption; Household; Technology impacts; Technology use

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER NETWORKS; METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; RESEARCH;

(OTDR) TECHNOLOGY; BUSINESS MEDIA; DIGITAL DIVIDES; FUTURE RESEARCH; NEW TECHNOLOGIES; RESEARCH DIRECTIONS; SOCIAL NETWORKING; SPRINGER (CO); TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION; TECHNOLOGY USE; UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES;

TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 46749092471     PISSN: 13873326     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10796-008-9098-z     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Brown, S. A., & Venkatesh, V. (2003). Bringing non-adopters along: The challenge facing the PC industry. Communications of the ACM, 46(4), 76-80.
2. Brown, S. A., & Venkatesh, V. (2005). Model of adoption of technology in households: A baseline model test and extension incorporating household life cycle. MIS Quarterly, 29(3), 399-326.
3. Carroll, J. M., & Rosson, M. B. (1996). Developing the Blacksburg electronic village. Communications of the ACM, 39(12), 69-75.
4. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982-1002.
5. Gilly, M. C., & Enis, B. M. (1982). Recycling the family life cycle: A proposal for redefinition. Advances in Consumer Research, 9, 271-276.
6. Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2003). When work and family collide: Deciding between competing role demands. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90, 291-303.
7. Hoffman, D. L., Novak, T. P., & Venkatesh, A. (2004). Has the internet become indispensable. Communications of the ACM, 47(7), 37-42.
8. Howe, J. (2006). The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired, Issue 14.06.
9. Hsieh, J. J., Rai, A., & Keil, M. (2008). Understanding digital inequality: Comparing continued use behavioral models of the socio-economically advantaged and disadvantaged. MIS Quarterly, 32(1), 97-126.
10. Jasperson, J., Carter, P. E., & Zmud, R. W. (2005). A comprehensive conceptualization of post-adoptive behaviors associated with information technology enabled work systems. MIS Quarterly, 29(3), 525-557.
11. Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., & Chervany, N. L. (1999). Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 183-213.
12. Kiesler, S., Zdaniuk, B., Lundmark, V., & Kraut, R. (2000). Troubles with the internet: The dynamics of help at home. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 323-351.
13. Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J. N., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. M. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 49-74.
14. Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017-1031.
15. Kraut, R. E., Scherlis, W., Mukhopadhyay, T., Manning, J., & Kiesler, S. (1996). Homenet: A field trial of residential Internet services. Communications of the ACM, 39, 55-65.
16. Livingston, B. A., & Judge, T. A. (2008). Emotional responses to work-family conflict: An examination of gender role orientation among working men and women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 207-216.
17. Maag, C. (2007). A hoax turned fatal draws anger but no charges. New York Times. November 2007. Accessed online: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/28/us/ 28hoax.html?_r=1&oref=slogin. Last accessed April 4, 2008.
18. Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Agarwal, J. (2004). Internet Users' Information Privacy Concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale, and a causal model. Information Systems Research, 15(4), 336-355.
19. Meyerson, D., Weick, K. E., & Kramer, R. M. (1996). Swift trust and temporary groups. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 166-195). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Moore, G. A. (1999). Crossing the chasm: Marketing and selling technology products to mainstream customers (2nd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
21. Muñiz, A. M. Jr., & Schau, H. J. (2007). Vigilante marketing and consumer-created communications. Journal of Advertising, 36(3), 187-202.
22. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). NewYork: Free.
23. Rossman, K. (2006). Weekend journal; blackberry orphans. Wall Street Journal (Eastern Edition), p. W.1.
24. Shih, E. C., & Venkatesh, A. (2004). Beyond adoption: Development and application of a use-diffusion model. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 59-72.
25. Valcour, M. (2007). Work-based resources as moderators of the relationship between work hours and satisfaction with work-family balance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1512-1523.
26. Venkatesh, A. (1996). Computers and other interactive technologies for the home. Communications of the ACM, 39(12), 47-54.
27. Venkatesh, A. (2005). The tech enabled networked home: An analysis of current trends and future promise. In W. Dutton, B. Kahin, et al. (Eds.), Transforming enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
28. Venkatesh, V., & Brown, S. A. (2001). A longitudinal investigation of personal computers in homes: Adoption determinants and emerging challenges. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 71-102.
29. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
30. Venkatesh, A., & Nicosia, F. (1997). "New technologies for the home-development of a theoretical model of household adoption and use". Advances in Consumer Research 24 (522-528).
31. Venkatesh, A., Stolzoff, N., Shih, E., & Mazumdar, S. (2001). The home of the future: An ethnographic study of new information technologies in the home. In M. Gilly, & J. Myers-Levy (Eds.), Advances in consumer research, vol. 28 (pp. 88-97). Urbana, IL: Association for Consumer Research.
32. Venkatesh, A., & Vitalari, N. (1992). Emerging distributed work arrangement: An investigation of computer supplemental work at home. Management Science, 38(12), 1687-1706.
33. Vitalari, N., Venkatesh, A., & Gronhaug, K. (1985). Computing in the home: Shifts in the time allocation patterns of households. Communications of the ACM, 28(5), 512-522.
34. Website Optimization, (2007) US falls to 25th in broadband penetration worldwide-US broadband growth below OECD average-April 2007 Bandwidth Report. http://www.websiteoptimization.com/bw/0704/, accessed March 13, 2008.