Assessing the impact of health technology assessment in the Netherlands

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 259-269

  Oortwijn, Wija J ^a   Hanney, Stephen R ^b   Ligtvoet, Andreas ^c   Hoorens, Stijn ^d   Wooding, Steven ^d   Grant, Jonathan ^d   Buxton, Martin J ^b   Bouter, Lex M ^e  

^a ECORYS Netherlands   (Netherlands)

^b BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^d RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

^e VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Health technology assessment; Impact; The Netherlands

Indexed keywords

HEALTH; LEAD; TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING;

(R ,S ,S) POLICY; CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY; CASE STUDIES; HEALTH RESEARCH; HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT (HTA); INDIVIDUAL (PSS 544-7); NETHERLANDS; PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS; RESEARCH STRATEGIES; SCORING METHODS; TREATMENT STRATEGIES; UNITED KINGDOM (UK);

HEALTH CARE;

ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; CASE STUDY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; INFERTILITY; INVESTMENT; NETHERLANDS; PEER REVIEW; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY;

DATA COLLECTION; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; NETHERLANDS; ORGANIZATIONAL CASE STUDIES; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

EID: 46749087118     PISSN: 02664623     EISSN: 14716348     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0266462308080355     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bouter LM, Knottnerus JA. Beoordeling van maatschappelijke relevantie van toegepast gezondheidsonderzoek: het belang van publiceren in nationale vaktijdschriften als ruwe indicator [Assessing the societal relevance of applied health research: the use of publications in national journals as an indicator]. Ned Tijdschr voor Geneeskd. 2000;144:1178-1183.
2. Buxton M, Hanney S. Assessing payback from Department of Health Research & Development. vol. 1. The main report. Research report #19. Uxbridge: HERG, Brunel University; 1994.
3. Buxton M, Hanney S. How can payback from health services research be assessed? J Health Serv Res Policy. 1996;1:35-43.
4. Buxton M, Hanney S, Packwood T, Roberts S, Youll P. Assessing benefits from Department of Health and National Health Service R&D. Public Money Manage. 2000;20:29-34.
5. Donovan C. The qualitative future of research evaluation. Sci Public Policy. 2007;34:585-597.
6. EMGO. Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine. Annual Report 2006. Chap 5. "Societal Impact." Amsterdam: EMGO Institute; 2007.
7. Fitch K, Bernstein SJ, Dolores Aguilar M, et al. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method user's manual, MR-1269-DG-XII/RE. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation; 2001.
8. Hanney S, Buxton M, Green C, Coulson D, Raftery J. An assessment of the impact of the NHS Health Technology Assessment Programme. Int J Health Technol Assess. 2007;11.
9. Hanney S, Soper B, Buxton M. Evaluation of the NHS R&D Implementation Methods Programme. HERG Research Report No 29. Uxbridge: HERG, Brunel University; 2003.
10. Hanney S, Grant J, Wooding S, Buxton M. Proposed methods for reviewing the outcomes of health research: the impact of funding by the UK's 'Arthritis Research Campaign.' Health Res Policy Syst. 2004;2:4.
11. National Institutes of Health. Research program outcomes assessment material. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 2000.
12. Raad voor Gezondheidsonderzoek. Onderzoek dat ertoe doet. De responsiviteit van universitair medische centra op vraagstukken in volksgezondheid en gezondheidszorg. No. 57 [Research that matters. Responsiveness of university hospital regarding public health and health care issues]. Den Haag: Raad voor Gezondheidsonderzoek; 2007.
13. Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. The societal impact of applied research towards a quality assessment system. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences; 2002.
14. Smith R. Measuring the social impact of research. BMJ. 2001;323:528.
15. Van Weel C. Biomedical science matters for people - so its impact should be better assessed. Lancet. 2001;360:1034-1035.
16. Wooding S, Hanney S, Buxton M, Grant J. Payback arising from research funding: Evaluation of the Arthritis Research Campaign. Rheumatology. 2005;44:1145-1156.
17. ZonMw. Annual Report 2001 of the ZonMw programme health care efficiency research. The Hague: ZonMw; 2002.
18. ZonMw. Annual Report 2002 of the ZonMw programme health care efficiency research. The Hague: ZonMw; 2003.