Exploring hedge identification in biomedical literature

Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 636-654

  Medlock, Ben ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Agreement; Annotation; Classification; Hedging; Machine learning; Natural language processing; Semi supervised learning

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); EDUCATION; ELECTRIC NETWORK ANALYSIS; ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE; FENCES; MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS; ROBOT LEARNING; SEPARATION;

AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION; BENCHMARK DATASET; BIOMEDICAL DOMAINS; BIOMEDICAL LITERATURE; CLASSIFICATION ACCURACIES; ELSEVIER (CO); FUTURE RESEARCH; LEARNING CURVES; MACHINE-LEARNING; PRECISE DESCRIPTION; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SEMI-SUPERVISED;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; AUTOANALYSIS; DATA MINING; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; LEARNING ALGORITHM; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; SOFTWARE; VOCABULARY, CONTROLLED;

EID: 46649112949     PISSN: 15320464     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.01.001     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Abney S. Bootstrapping. In: Proceedings of 40th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics; 2002. p. 360-7.
2. 3 = alpha (or beta). Technical report, University of Essex, Department of Computer Science; 2005.
3. Banko M, Brill E. Scaling to very very large corpora for natural language disambiguation. In: Meeting of the association for computational linguistics; 2001. p. 26-33.
4. Bekkerman R, Allan J. Using bigrams in text categorization. Technical report 408, CIIR; 2005.
5. Blum A., and Mitchell T. Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training. COLT' 98: proceedings of the eleventh annual conference on computational learning theory (1998), ACM Press, New York, NY, USA 92-100
6. Briscoe T, Carroll J, Watson R. The second release of the rasp system. In: Proceedings of the COLING/ACL on interactive presentation sessions, Morristown, NJ, USA; 2006. Association for Computational Linguistics. p. 77-80.
7. Chen J, Ji D, Tan CL, Niu Z. Relation extraction using label propagation based semi-supervised learning. In: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on computational linguistics and 44th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics; 2006. p. 129-36.
8. Collins M, Singer Y. Unsupervised models for named entity classification. In: Proceedings of the joint SIGDAT conference on empirical methods in natural language processing and very large corporation; 1999.
9. Eyheramendy S, Lewis D, Madigan D. On the Naive Bayes model for text categorization. In: Paper presented at the artificial intelligence and statistics conference, Key West, FL; 2003.
10. Fano R. Transmission of information (1961), MIT Press, Cambridge (MA)
11. Goldman S., and Zhou Y. Enhancing supervised learning with unlabeled data. Proceedings of 17th international conference on machine learning (2000), Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (CA) 327-334
12. Hripcsak G., and Rothschild A. Agreement, the f-measure, and reliability in information retrieval. J Am Med Inform Assoc 12 3 (2004) 296-298
13. Hyland K. Hedging in academic writing and eap textbooks. English Specif Purp 13 (1994) 239-256
14. Hyland K. Talking to the academy: forms of hedging in science research articles. Writ Commun 13 (1996) 251-281
15. Joachims T. Making large-scale support vector machine learning practical. In: Schölkopf A.S.B., and Burges C. (Eds). Advances in Kernel methods: support vector machines (1999), MIT Press, Cambridge (MA)
16. Juan A, Ney H. Reversing and smoothing the multinomial Naive Bayes text classifier. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on pattern recognition in information systems (PRIS 2002), Alacant (Spain); 2002. p. 200-12.
17. Karamanis N, Lewin I, Seal R, Drysdale R, Briscoe T. Integrating natural language processing with FlyBase curation. In: Proceedings of PSB 2007; 2007. p. 245-56.
18. Lewis D.D., Yang Y., Rose T.G., and Li F. RCV1: a new benchmark collection for text categorization research. J Mach Learn Res 5 (2004) 361-397
19. Light M, Qiu X, Srinivasan P. The language of bioscience: facts, speculations, and statements in between. In: Proceedings of BioLink 2004 workshop on linking biological literature, ontologies and databases: tools for users, Boston, May 2004; 2004.
20. McCallum A, Nigam K. A comparison of event models for naive bayes text classification. In: AAAI-98 workshop on learning for text categorization; 1998.
21. McClosky D, Charniak E, Johnson M. Effective self-training for parsing. In: Proceedings of the main conference on human language technology conference of the North American chapter of the association of computational linguistics, Morristown, NJ, USA; 2006. Association for Computational Linguistics. p. 152-9.
22. Medlock B, Briscoe T. Weakly supervised learning for hedge classification in scientific literature. In: Proceedings of the 45rd annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (ACL'07), Prague; June 2007. Association for Computational Linguistics.
23. Mercer RE, Marco CD. A design methodology for a biomedical literature indexing tool using the rhetoric of science. In: LT-NAACL 2004 workshop: Biolink 2004, linking biological literature, ontologies and databases; 2004.
24. Moschitti A, Basili R. Complex linguistic features for text classification: a comprehensive study. In: ECIR; 2004. p. 181-196.
25. Muslea I., Minton S., and Knoblock C.A. Active + semi-supervised learning = robust multi-view learning. ICML'02: proceedings of the nineteenth international conference on machine learning (2002), Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA 435-442
26. Ng V, Cardie C. Weakly supervised natural language learning without redundant views. In: NAACL'03: proceedings of the 2003 conference of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics on human language technology, Morristown, NJ, USA; 2003. Association for Computational Linguistics. p. 94-101.
27. Nigam K., McCallum A.K., Thrun S., and Mitchell T.M. Text classification from labeled and unlabeled documents using EM. Mach Learn 39 2/3 (2000) 103-134
28. Peng F., Schuurmans D., and Wang S. Augmenting Naive Bayes classifiers with statistical language models. Inf Retrieval 7 3-4 (2004) 317-345
29. Karl-Michael, and Schneider. Techniques for improving the performance of Naive Bayes for text classification. Comput Linguist Intell Text Process (2005) 682-693
30. Su Q, Xiang K, Wang H, Sun B, Yu S. Using pointwise mutual information to identify implicit features in customer review. In: ICCPOL 2006, Singapore, December 17-19; 2006.
31. Tan C.-M., Wang Y.-F., and Lee C.-D. The use of bigrams to enhance text categorization. Inf Process Manage 38 4 (2002) 529-546
32. Wellner B. Weakly supervised learning methods for improving the quality of gene name normalization data. In: Proceedings of the ACL-ISMB workshop on linking biological literature, ontologies and databases: mining biological semantics, Detroit; June 2005. Association for Computational Linguistics. p. 1-8.
33. Yang Y, Liu X. A re-examination of text categorization methods. In: Proceedings of the 22nd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval; 1999. p. 42-9.
34. Yangarber R. Counter-training in discovery of semantic patterns. In: Hinrichs E, Roth D, editors. Proceedings of the 41st annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics; 2003. p. 343-50.
35. Yarowsky D. Unsupervised word sense disambiguation rivaling supervised methods. In: Proceedings of the 33rd annual meeting on association for computational linguistics, Morristown, NJ, USA; 1995. Association for Computational Linguistics. p. 189-96.
36. Zhang Z. Weakly-supervised relation classification for information extraction. CIKM'04: proceedings of the thirteenth ACM international conference on information and knowledge management (2004), ACM Press, New York, NY, USA 581-588
37. Zhu X, Lafferty J, Ghahramani Z. Combining active learning and semi-supervised learning using gaussian fields and harmonic functions. In: Proceedings of the ICML 2003 workshop on the continuum from labeled to unlabeled data in machine learning and data mining; 2003.