Natural neighbour Petrov-Galerkin Method for shape design sensitivity analysis

CMES - Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 107-121

  Wang, Kai ^a   Zhou, Shenjie ^a   Nie, Zhifeng ^a   Kong, Shengli ^a  

^a SHANDONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Meshless method; Natural neighbour interpolation; Petrov Galerkin method; Shape design sensitivity analysis

Indexed keywords

ANALOG DIFFERENTIAL ANALYZERS; FUNCTION EVALUATION; GALERKIN METHODS; MESH GENERATION; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; STIFFNESS MATRIX;

ASSEMBLY PROCESSING; DESIGN SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS (DSA); DESIGN VARIABLES; GLOBAL STIFFNESS MATRICES; GOVERNING EQUATIONS; LOCAL WEAK FORM; MESHLESS LOCAL PETROV-GALERKIN (MPLG) METHOD; NATURAL NEIGHBOUR; NUMERICAL EXAMPLES; PETROV-GALERKIN (PG) METHODS; SHAPE DESIGN SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SHAPE FUNCTIONS; USER-DEFINED PARAMETERS; WEAK FORM;

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 46649095607     PISSN: 15261492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Andreaus, U.; Batra, R. C; Porfiri, M. (2005): Vibrations of cracked Euler-Bernoulli beams using Meshless Local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) method, CMES: Computer Modeling In Engineering & Sciences, vol. 9 no. 3, pp. 111-131.
2. Atluri, S. N.; Zhu, T. (1998): A new meshless local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) approach in computational mechanics, Computational Mechanics, vol. 22, pp. 117-127.
3. Atluri, S. N.; Kim, H. G.; Cho, J. Y. (1999): A critical assessment of the truly meshless local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) and local boundary integral equation methods, Computational Mechanics, vol. 24, pp. 348-372.
4. Atluri, S. N.; Shen, S. (2002): The meshless local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) method: a simple and less-costly alternative to the finite element and boundary element methods, CMES: Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol. 3 no.l, pp. 11-51.
5. Atluri, S. N.; Han, Z. D.; Rajendran, A. M. (2004): A new implementation of the meshless finite volume method, through the MLPG "Mixed" approach, CMES: Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol. 6 no. 6, pp. 491-513.
6. Atluri, S. N.; Liu, H. T.; Han, Z. D. (2006a): Meshless local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) mixed collocation method for elasticity problems, CMES: Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol. 14 no. 3, pp. 141-152.
7. Atluri, S. N.; Liu, H. T.; Han, Z. D. (2006b): Meshless local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) mixed finite difference method for solid mechanics, CMES: Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol. 15 no. l,pp. 1-16.
8. Belytschko, T.; Lu, Y.; Gu, L. (1994): Element free Galerkin methods, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 37 no. 2, pp. 229-256.
9. Belytschko, T., Krongauz, Y., Organ, D., Fleming, M., Krysl, P. (1996): Meshless methods: An overview and recent developments, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 139, pp. 3-47.
10. Bobaru, F.; Mukherjee, S. (2001): Shape sensitivity analysis and shape optimization in planar elasticity using the element-free Galerkin method, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 190, pp. 4319-4337.
11. Bobaru, F.; Mukherjee, S. (2002): Meshless approach to shape optimization of linear thermoelastic solid, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 53 no. 4, pp. 765-796.
12. Chang, K. H.; Choi, K. K.; Tsai, C. S.; Chen, C. J.; Choi, B. S.; Yu, X. (1995): Design sensitivity analysis and optimization tool (DSO) for shape design applications, Computing Systems in Engineering: An International Journal, vol. 6 no. 26, pp. 151-175.
13. Ching, H. K.; Chen, J. K. (2006): Thermomechanical analysis of functionally graded composites under laser heating by the MLPG method, CMES: Computer Modeling In Engineering & Sciences, vol. 13 no. 3, pp. 199-217.
14. Cueto, E.; Sukumar, N.; Calvo, B.; Cegoñino, J.; Doblaré, M. (2003): Overview and Recent Advances in Natural Neighbour Galerkin Methods, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering. vol. 10 no. 4, pp. 307-384.
15. Dolbow, J.; Belytschko, T. (1999): Numerical Integration of the Galerkin Weak Form in Mesh-free Methods, Computational Mechanics, vol. 23, pp. 219-230.
16. Fuenmayor, F. J.; Oliver, J. L.; Ródenas, J. J. (1997): Extension of the zienkiewicz-zhu error estimator to shape sensitivity analysis, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 40 no. 8, pp. 1413-1433.
17. Gao, L., Liu, K.; Liu, Y. (2006): Applications of MLPG method in dynamic fracture problems, CMES: Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol. 12 no. 3, pp. 181-195.
18. GiD: The personal pre and postprocessor. http://gid. cimne. upc.es
19. Grindeanu, I.; Kim, N. H.; Choi, K. K.; Chen, J. S. (2002): CAD-based shape optimization using a meshfree method, Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications, vol. 10 no. 1, pp. 55-66.
20. Han, Z. D.; Atluri, S. N. (2004): Meshless local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) approaches for solving 3D problems in elasto-statics, CMES: Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol. 6 no.2, pp. 169-188.
21. Han, Z. D.; Rajendran, A. M.; Atluri, S. N. (2005): Meshless Local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) approaches for solving nonlinear problems with large deformations and rotations, CMES: Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol. 10 no. l,pp. 1-12.
22. Han, Z. D.; Liu, H. T.; Rajendran, A. M.; Atluri, S. N. (2006): The applications of meshless local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) approaches in high-speed impact, penetration and perforation problems. CMES: Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences. vol. 14 no. 2, pp. 119-128.
23. Jarak, T.; Soric, J.; Hoster, J. (2007): Analysis of shell deformation responses by the meshless local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) approach, CMES: Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol. 18 no. 3, pp. 235-246.
24. Kim, N. H.; Yi, K.; Choi, K. K. (2002): A material derivative approach in design sensitivity analysis of three-dimensional contact problems, International Journal of Solids and Structures, vol. 39 no. 8, pp. 2087-2108.
25. Kim, N. H.; Choi, K. K.; Botkin, M. E. (2003): Numerical method for shape optimization using meshfree method, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, vol. 24 no. 6, pp. 418-429.
26. Lacroix, D.; Bouillard, P. (2003): Improved sensitivity analysis by a coupled FE-EFG method, Computers and Structures, vol. 81 no. 26-27, pp. 2431-2439.
27. Liu, W. K.; Jun, S.; Zhang, Y. F. (1995): Reproducing kernel particle methods, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, vol. 20 no. 8-9, pp. 1081-1106.
28. Ródenas, J. J.; Fuenmayor, F. J.; Tarancón, J. E. (2004): A numerical methodology to assess the quality of the design velocity field computation methods in shape sensitivity analysis, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 59 no.13, pp. 1725-1747.
29. Shen, S. P.; Atluri, S. N. (2004): Multiscale simulation based on the meshless local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) method, CMES: Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol. 5 no. 3, pp. 235-255.
30. Sladek, J.; Sladek, V.; Zhang C, Solek, P. (2007): Application of the MLPG to thermopiezoelectricity, CMES: Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol. 22 no. 3, pp. 217-233.
31. rd edition, McGraw Hill.
32. Vavourakis, V.; Sellountos, E. J.; Polyzos, D. (2006): A comparison study on different MLPG(LBIE) formulations, CMES: Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol. 13 no. 3, pp. 171-183.
33. Vavourakis, V.; Polyzos, D. (2007): A MLPG4 (LBIE) formulation in elastostatics, CMC: Computers Materials & Continua, vol. 5 no. 3, pp. 185-196.
34. Wang, K.; Zhou, S. J.; Shan, G. J. (2005): The natural neighbour Petrov-Galerkin method for elasto-statics, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 63 no. 8, pp. 1126-1145.