Innovation clusters in technological systems: A network analysis of 15 OECD countries for the mid-1990s

Industry and Innovation

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 321-346

  Montresor, Sandro ^a   Marzetti, Giuseppe Vittucci ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Embodied innovation flows; Innovation clusters; R D expenditure; Technological systems

Indexed keywords

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; INNOVATION; NETWORK ANALYSIS; OECD; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 46649094390     PISSN: 13662716     EISSN: 14698390     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13662710802041679     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Batagelj, V., Mrvar, A. E. J. and De Nooy, W. (2005) Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
2. Brown, M. and Conrad, A. M. (1967) The influence of research and education on CES production relations. The Theory and Empirical Analysis of Production, Columbia University Press, New York
3. Chang, P.-L. and Shih, H.-Y. (2005) Comparing patterns of intersectoral innovation diffusion in Taiwan and China: A network analysis. Technovation, 25, pp. 155-169.
4. CIMPAN (2003) Inventory of the Polish National Innovation System (NIS).
5. Cooke, P., Gomez-Uranga, M. and Etxebarria, G. (1997) Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy, 26, pp. 475-491.
6. Cooke, P., Heidenreich, M. and Braczyk, H. J. (2004) Regional Innovation Systems: The Role of Governance in a Globalized World, Routledge, London
7. Davis, J. A. and Leinhardt, S. (1972) The structure of positive interpersonal relations in small groups. Sociological Theories in Progress, pp. 218-251. Houghton Mifflin, Boston
8. DeBresson, C. (1996) New locational factors for the creation of technical knowledge. Economic Interdependence and Innovative Activity. An Input-Output Analysis, pp. 227-236. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
9. DeBresson, C. (1996) Toward stochastic theories of innovative activities. Economic Interdependence and Innovative Activity. An Input-Output Analysis, pp. 308-333. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
10. DeBresson, C. (1996) Why innovative activities cluster. Economic Interdependence and Innovative Activity. An Input-Output Analysis, pp. 149-165. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
11. DeBresson, C., Sirilli, G., Lemay, J., Hu, X. and Luk, F. (1996) Innovative clusters in Italy (1981-1985). Economic Interdependence and Innovative Activity. An Input-Output Analysis, pp. 165-189. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
12. Diestel, R. (2005) Graph Theory, Springer-Verlag, New York and Heidelberg
13. Dietzenbacher, E. and Romero, I. (2007) Production chains in an interregional framework: Identification by means of average propagation lengths. International Regional Science Review, 30:4, pp. 362-383.
14. Doreian, P., Batagelj, V. and Ferligoj, A. (2000) Symmetric-acyclic decompositions of networks. Journal of Classification, 17, pp. 3-28.
15. Doreian, P., Batagelj, V. and Ferligoj, A. (2005) Generalized Blockmodeling, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
16. Duchin, F. and Levine, S. H. (2007) Tracking global factor inputs, factor earnings, and emissions associated with consumption in a world modeling framework.
17. Edquist, C. (1997) Systems of innovation approaches-their emergence and characteristics. Systems of Innovation. Technologies, Institutions and Organisations, Pinter, London
18. Edquist, C. and Johnson, B. (1997) Institutions and organisations in systems of innovation. Systems of Innovation. Technologies, Institutions and Organisations, pp. 41-63. Pinter, London
19. (2000) Systems of Innovation: Growth, Competitiveness and Employment, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
20. Holland, P. and Leinhardt, S. (1970) A method for detecting structure in sociometric data. American Journal of Sociology, 70, pp. 492-513.
21. Holland, P. and Leinhardt, S. (1971) Transitivity in structural models of small groups. Comparative Group Studies, 2, pp. 107-124.
22. Johnson, B. (1992) Institutional learning. National Systems of Innovation. Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, pp. 23-44. Pinter, London
23. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning-Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
24. Leoncini, R. (1998) The nature of long-run technological change: innovation, evolution and technological systems. Research Policy, 27, pp. 75-93.
25. Leoncini, R. and Montresor, S. (2000) Classifying technological systems: an empirical application to eight OECD countries. Technology and Knowledge: From the Firm to Innovation Systems, pp. 152-173. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
26. Leoncini, R. and Montresor, S. (2000) Network analysis of eight technological systems. International Review of Applied Economics, 14:2, pp. 213-234.
27. Leoncini, R. and Montresor, S. (2001) The automobile technological systems. An empirical analysis of four European countries. Research Policy, 30, pp. 1321-1340.
28. Leoncini, R. and Montresor, S. (2003) Intersectoral innovation flows. Technological Systems and Intersectoral Innovation Flows, pp. 49-73. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
29. Leoncini, R. and Montresor, S. (2003) The technological system. Technological Systems and Intersectoral Innovation Flows, pp. 33-49. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
30. Leoncini, R. and Montresor, S. (2003) Technological Systems and Intersectoral Innovation Flows, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
31. Leoncini, R. and Montresor, S. (2005) Accounting for core and extra-core relationships in technological systems: A methodological proposal. Research Policy, 34, pp. 83-100.
32. Leoncini, R., Maggioni, A. and Montresor, S. (1996) Intersectoral innovation flows and national technological systems: Network analysis for comparing Italy and Germany. Research Policy, 25, pp. 415-430.
33. Loasby, B. J. (2000) The division and organisation of knowledge. European Journal of Economic and Social Systems, 14:2, pp. 143-155.
34. (1992) National Systems of Innovation. Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, Pinter, London
35. Malerba, F. (1993) The national system of innovation: Italy. National Innovation Systems. A Comparative Analysis, Oxford University Press, Oxford
36. Marengo, L. and Sterlacchini, A. (1990) Intersectoral technology flows. Methodological aspects and empirical applications. Metroeconomica, 41, pp. 19-39.
37. Montresor, S. and Vittucci Marzetti, G. (2007) Innovation clusters in technological systems: A network analysis of 15 OECD countries for the middle '90s.
38. Montresor, S. and Vittucci Marzetti, G. (2007) Constructing intersectoral innovation diffusion networks with input-output: How to get relative flows? An illustrative application to six OECD technological systems for the middle '90s.
39. OECD (1992) Technology and the Economy. The Key Relationships, OECD, Paris
40. OECD (1999) Boosting Innovations, the Cluster Approach, OECD, Paris
41. OECD (2001) Innovative Clusters, Drivers of National Innovation Systems, OECD, Paris
42. OECD (2003) OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2003-towards a knowledge-based economy.
43. OECD (2006) Economic survey of Poland 2006.
44. Oerlemans, L. A. G., Meeus, M. T. H. and Boekema, F. W. M. (2001) Firm clustering and innovation: Determinants and effects.
45. Ørstavik, F. and Nås, S. O. (1998) Institutional mapping of the Norwegian system of innovation.
46. Papaconstantinou, G., Sakurai, N. and Wyckoff, A. (1996) Embodied technological diffusion: An empirical analysis for 10 OECD countries.
47. Patel, P. and Pavitt, K. (1995) Patterns of technological activity: their measurement and interpretation. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, pp. 9-32. Blackwell, Oxford
48. Pavitt, K. (1984) Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13
49. Perroux, F. (1950) Economic space: Theory and applications. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64:1, pp. 89-104.
50. Porter, M. (2000) Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14:1, pp. 15-34.
51. Potts, J. (2000) The New Evolutionary Microeconomics, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
52. Tomlinson, M. and Lundvall, B.Å. (2001) Policy learning through benchmarking national systems of competence building and innovation-learning by comparing.
53. von Hippel, E. (1976) The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process. Research Policy, 5, pp. 212-239.
54. Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge