Energy responses and visibility for thin film-thermoluminescent dosimeters in mammography

Radiation Measurements

Volumn 43, Issue 2-6, 2008, Pages 964-967

  Hsu, G C ^a   Tsai, H Y ^b,c,d   Chu, C H ^e,f   Yiou, S M ^a  

^a TRI SERVICE GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^b CHUNG SHAN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c CHUNG SHAN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^d CHANG GUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^e INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR ENERGY RESEARCH   (Taiwan)

^f NATIONAL YANG MING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Energy response; GR 200F; Thin film TLD; TLD visibility

Indexed keywords

DOSIMETERS; GRANULAR MATERIALS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAMMOGRAPHY;

ENERGY RESPONSE; THIN-FILM TLD; TLD VISIBILITY;

THIN FILMS;

EID: 46549088554     PISSN: 13504487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2008.01.030     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Duggan L., et al. Variations in dose response with X-ray energy of LiF:Mg,Cu,P thermoluminescence dosimeters: implications for clinical dosimetry. Phys. Med. Biol. 49 (2004) 3831-3845
2. Johns, H.E., 1983. The Physics of Radiology, p. 278.
3. Lin J.P., et al. Skin dose measurement by using ultra-thin TLDs. Appl. Radiat. Isotopes 55 (2001) 383-391
4. Warren-Forward H.M., et al. Towards in vivo TLD dosimetry in mammography. Br. J. Radiol. 77 (2004) 426-432
5. Wu X., et al. Normalized average glandular dose in molydenum target-rhodium filter and rhodium target-rhodium filter mammography. Radiology 193 (1994) 83-89