Predicting invasive species impacts on hydrological processes: The consequences of plant physiology for landscape processes

Weed Technology

Volumn 18, Issue SPEC. ISSUE 1, 2004, Pages 1408-1410

  Le Maitre, D C ^a  

^a DSI CSIR Nanotechnology Innovation Centre   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 46549083714     PISSN: 0890037X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/0890-037X(2004)018[1408:PISIOH]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Bosch, J. M. and J. D. Hewlett. 1982. A review of catchment experiments to determine the effect of vegetation changes on water yield and evapotranspiration. J. Hydrol. 55:3-23.
2. Calder, I. R. 1996. Water use by forests at the plot and catchment scale. Commonw. For. Rev. Special Issue on "Forests and Climate." 75:19-30.
3. Calder, I. R. 1999. The Blue Revolution. London: Earthscan. 192 p.
4. Calder, I. R. and P. J. Dye. 2000. Hydrological impacts of invasive alien plants. In G. Preston, G. Brown, and E. van Wyk, eds. Best Management Practices: Alien Invasive Species. Cape Town, South Africa: Working for Water Programme. Pp. 160-179.
5. Gerlach, J. D., Jr. 2004. The impacts of serial land-use changes and biological invasions on soil water resources in California, USA: Web page: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-1963(03)00102-2. J. Arid Environ. 57:365-379.
6. Jackson, R. B., J. Canadell, J. R. Ehleringer, H. A. Mooney, O. E. Sala, and E.-D. Schulze. 1996. A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes. Oecologia 108:389-411.
7. Jarvis, P. G. and K. G. McNaughton. 1986. Stomatal control of transpiration: scaling up from leaf to region. Adv. Ecol. Res. 15:1-49.
8. Le Maitre, D. C., D. B. Versfeld, and R. A. Chapman. 2000. The impact of invading alien plants on surface water resources in South Africa: a preliminary assessment. Water SA 26:397-408.
9. Mooney, H. A., J. A. McNeely, L. Neville, P. J. Schei, and J. Waage. eds. 2004. Invasive Alien Species: Searching for Solutions. Washington, DC: Island. In press. 352 p.
10. Pimentel, D. ed. 2001. Biological Invasions: Economic and Environmental Costs of Alien Plant, Animal, and Microbe Species. Boca Raton, FL: CRC. 369 p.
11. Sala, A., S. D. Smith, and D. A. Devitt. 1996. Water use by Tamarix ramosissima and associated phreatophytes in a Mojave Desert floodplain. Ecol. Appl. 6:888-898.
12. Van Wilgen, B. W., P. R. Little, R. A. Chapman, A.H.M. Görgens, T. Willems, and C. Marais. 1997. The sustainable development of water resources: history, finances, costs, and benefits of alien plant control programmes. S. Afr. J. Sci. 93:404-411.
13. Vitousek, P. M., C. M. D'Antonio, L. L. Loope, and R. Westbrooks. 1996. Biological invasions and global environmental change. Am. Sci. 84:468-478.
14. Zavaleta, E. 2000. Valuing ecosystem services lost to Tamarix invasion in the United States. In H. A. Mooney and R. J Hobbs, eds. Invasive Species in a Changing World. Washington, DC: Island. Pp. 261-300.
15. Zhang, L., W. R. Dawes, and G. R. Walker. 1999. Predicting the Effect of Vegetation Changes on Catchment Average Water Balance. Technical Rep. 99/12, CRC for Catchment Hydrology. Canberra, Australia: CSIRO. 35 p.