Conceptualizing the dynamics of social responsibility: Evidence from a case study of Estonia

Journal of Business Ethics

Volumn 81, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 371-385

  Alas, Ruth ^a   Tafel, Külliki ^b  

^a ESTONIAN BUSINESS SCHOOL   (Estonia)

^b Eesti Tuleviku uuringute Instituut   (Estonia)

Author keywords

Corporate social responsibility; Estonia; Owner; Transition economy

Indexed keywords

EID: 46449132586     PISSN: 01674544     EISSN: 15730697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-007-9501-6     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Alas R.: 2004 The Reasons for the Low Popularity of Trade Unions in Estonia. Journal of Human Resource Management, 1-2: 14-28
2. Balogun, J. and V. H. Hailey: 2004, Exploring Strategic Change (Prentice Hall).
3. Carroll A. B.: 1991 The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34: 39-48
4. Garriga E., D. Melé: 2004 Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1-2): 51-71
5. Gatewood E., A. B. Carroll: 1981 The Anatomy of Corporate Social Response. Business Horizons, 24: 9-16
6. Gray, J. and S. Graff: 2003, Responsibility strategies (Green@work, January/ February).
7. Friedman, M.: 1970, 'The Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits', New York Times Magazine, 13 September
8. Hoffman, A. J.: 1997, From heresy to dogma: An institutional history of corporate environmentalism (San Francisco: New Lexington Press).
9. Laar, M.: 2002, New Beginning of Estonia (Konrad Adenauer Stiftung).
10. van Marrewijk, M.: 2003 Concepts and Definitions of CSR and Corporate Sustainability: Between Agency and Communication. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2/3): 95-105
11. Reidenbach R. E., D. P. Robin: 1991 A Conceptual Model of Corporate Moral Development. Journal of Business Ethics, 10: 273-284
12. Singer A. E.: 1994 Strategy as Moral Philosophy. Strategic Management Journal, 15(3): 191-213
13. Szwajkowski, E. W.: 1986, 'The Myths and Realities of Research of Organizational Misconduct', in Post, J. E. (ed.), Research in corporate social performance and policy, Vol. 9 (JAI Press, Greenwich, Conn), pp. 103-122.
14. Schwartz M. S., A. B. Carroll: 2003 Corporate Social Responsibility: A Three Domain Approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4): 503-530
15. Terk, E.: 2005, Eesti majanduspoliitika: muutuv või muutumatu - Eesti poliitika eile, täna, homme. Tartu Johannes Mihkelsoni Keskus.
16. Wartick S. L., P. L. Cochran: 1985 The Evolution on the Corporate Social Performance Model. Academy of Management Review, 10: 758-769
17. Wilenius, M.: 2005, Towards the age of corporate responsibility? Emerging challenges for the business world, www.elsevier.com/locate/futures, visited June 2005.
18. Wood D. J.: 1991 Corporate Social Performance Revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4): 691-718