No easy path to hrm performance measurement systems: exploring the introduction of the U.S. human capital assessment and accountability framework and the flemish management code

Public Personnel Management

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 243-260

  Vandenabeele, Wouter ^a   Hondeghem, Annie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 46449121937     PISSN: 00910260     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/009102600803700207     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Polster, T. H. (2003). Measuring performance in public and nonprofit organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2000). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; de Lancer, J. P., & Holzer, M. (2001). Promoting the utilization of performance measures in public organizations: An empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation. Public Administration Review, 61(6), 693-708.
3. Behn, R. D. (2003). Why measure performance ? Different purposes require different measures. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 586-606.
4. Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2000), op cit.; de Lancer, J. P, & Holzer, M. (2001), op cit.
5. Bouckaert, G. (1994). The history of the productivity movement. In M. Holzer & A. Halachmi (Eds.), Competent government: Theory and practice - The best of Public Productivity and Management Review, 1985-1993 (pp. 361-397). Burke, VA: Chatelaine Press.
6. Shim, D-S. (2001). Recent human resources developments in OECD member countries. Public Personnel Management, 30(3), 323-347.
7. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Christensen, T., & Laegreid, P. (2001). New public management: The transformation of ideas and practice. Aldershot, England: Ashgate; Hood, C. (1995). Emerging issues in public administration. Public Administration, 73(1), 165-183.
9. Yin, R. K. (1981). The case study crisis: Some answers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(1), 58-65.
10. Yin, R. K. (1994), op cit.
11. Anthony, R. N. (1994). Management control in nonprofit organizations. Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin; Lindblom, C. E., & Woodhouse, E. J. (1993). The policy-making process. London: Prentice-Hall; Birkland, T. A. (2001). An introduction to the policy process: Theories, concepts, and models of public policy making. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
12. Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2000), op cit.
13. Birkland, T. A. (2001), op cit.; Colebatch, H. K. (1998). Policy. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
14. Howlett, M. R, & Ramesh, M. (1995). Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems. Oxford:, England Oxford University Press.
15. Denhardt, R. B. (2000). Theories of public organization. Fort Worth, TX:. Harcourt Brace College.
16. Peters, B. G.. (2000). Policy instruments and public management: bridging the gaps. In: Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(1), 35-47.
17. Howlett, M. P., & Ramesh, M. (1995), op cit.
18. Nachmias, D. & Felbinger, C. (1982). Utilization in the policy cycle: Directions for research. Policy Studies Review, 2(2), 300-308.
19. Birkland, T. A. (2001), op cit.
20. Cook, F. L., Tyler, T. R., Goetz, E. G., & Gordon, M. T. (1983). Media and agenda setting: effects on the public, interest group leaders, policy makers and policy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47(1), 16-35.
21. Howlett, M. P., & Ramesh, M. (1995), op cit.
22. Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. New York: Harper Collins.
23. Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2000), op cit.
24. Kingdon, J. W. (1995), op cit.; Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2000), op cit.
25. Howlett, M. P., & Ramesh, M. (1995), op cit.
26. Birkland, T. A. (2001), op cit.
27. Lindblom, C. E., & Wbodhouse, E. J. (1993), op cit.
28. Birkland, T. A. (2001), op cit.
29. Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2000), op cit.
30. Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1984). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; Ring, P., & Perry, J. (1985). Strategic management in public and private organizations: Implications of distinctive contexts and constraints. Academy of Management Review, 10(2), 276-286.
31. Menthé D. T., Wilson, D., & Perry, J. L. (2000). A review of research on incremental approaches to strategy. In Jack Rabin, Gerald J. Millers, & W. Bartley Hildreth (Eds.), Handbook of strategic management (pp. 31-65). New York: Marcel Dekker; Shapek R. A. (2000). Organizational capacity in strategic management. In Jack Rabin, Gerald J. Millers, & W. Bartley Hildreth (Eds.), Handbook of strategic management (pp. 141-163). New York. Marcel Dekker; Eadie D. C. (2000). Change in chewable bites: Managing the strategic portfolio. In Jack Rabin, Gerald J. Millers, & W. Bartley Hildreth (Eds.), Handbook of strategic management (pp. 123-139): New York. Marcel Dekker; Crow, M., & Bozeman, B. (1988). Strategic public management. In John M. Bryson & Robert C. Einsweiler (Eds.), Strategic planning: Threats and opportunities for planners (pp. 51-68). Chicago: Planners Press; Crow, M., & Bozeman, B. (1988), op cit.; Bryson, J. M., & Crosby, B. C. (1995). Leadership roles in making strategic planning work. In John M. Bryson (ed.), Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations: Aguide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement (pp. 221-227): San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
32. Wildavsky, A. (2000). Speaking truth to power: The art and craft of policy analysis. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers; Thoenig, J-C. (2001). Evaluating public sector reforms: Learning from practice. Revista internacional de estudos politicos, 2(special issue), 193-214.
33. Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2001). Evaluating public management reforms: An international perspective. Revista internacional de estudos politicos, 2(special issue), 167-192; Sabatier, P. A. (1998). The political context of evaluation research: an advocacy coalition perspective. In Marie-Christine Kessler, Pierre Lascoumes, Michel Setbon, & Jean-Claude Thoenig (Eds.), Evaluation des politiques publiques (pp. 129-146). Paris: L'Harmattan.
34. Pollitt, C. (1995). Justification by works or by faith? Evaluating the new public management. Evaluation, 1(2), 133-145.
35. Yin, R. K. (1994), op cit.
36. Radin, B. A. (2000). The Government Performance and Results Act and the tradition of federal management reform: Square pegs in round holes. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(1), 111-135.
37. Merit Systems Protection Board. (2001). The U.S. Office of Personnel Management in retrospect: Achievements and challenges after two decades. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
38. Boxall, P, & Purcell, J. (2000). Strategic human resource management: Where have we come from and where should we be going? International Journal of Management Review, 2(2), 183-203; Boxall, P, & Purcell, J. (2003). Strategy and human resource management. Houndmills, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
39. Becker, B. B., Huselid, M. A., & Ulrich, D. (2001). The HR scorecard: Linking people, strategy and performance. Boston: Harvard Busines School Press; Pfeffer, J. (1998). The human equation: Building profits by putting people first. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
40. Tompkins, J. (2002). Strategic human resources management in government: unresolved issues. Public Personnel Management, 31(1), 95-110.
41. Ring, P., & James, P. (1985), op cit.