|
Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 536-541
|
Comparison of two methods of isolation and culture of osteoclasts and the dynamic observation of bone resorption
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ACID PHOSPHATASE;
CALCIFEDIOL;
CALCIUM;
ANIMAL;
ARTICLE;
BONE MARROW CELL;
CELL CULTURE;
CELL DIFFERENTIATION;
CELL SEPARATION;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CULTURE TECHNIQUE;
CYTOLOGY;
DRUG EFFECT;
INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH MOUSE;
METABOLISM;
METHODOLOGY;
MOUSE;
NEWBORN;
OSTEOCLAST;
OSTEOLYSIS;
PATHOLOGY;
RABBIT;
ACID PHOSPHATASE;
ANIMALS;
ANIMALS, NEWBORN;
BONE MARROW CELLS;
BONE RESORPTION;
CALCIFEDIOL;
CALCIUM;
CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES;
CELL DIFFERENTIATION;
CELL SEPARATION;
CELLS, CULTURED;
MICE;
MICE, INBRED ICR;
OSTEOCLASTS;
RABBITS;
|
EID: 46449117787
PISSN: 1671167X
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (2)
|
References (0)
|